From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
nks@flawful.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:00:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016060021.sotk72u4hioctg7o@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016042434.org6ibdqsqbzcdww@vireshk-i7>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-10-20, 19:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > OK, this breaks with SCMI which doesn't provide clocks but manage OPPs
> > directly. Before this change clk_get(dev..) was allowed to fail and
> > --EPROBE_DEFER was not an error.
>
> I think the change in itself is fine. We should be returning from
> there if we get EPROBE_DEFER. The question is rather why are you
> getting EPROBE_DEFER here ?
>
Ah OK, I didn't spend too much time, saw -EPROBE_DEFER, just reverted
this patch and it worked. I need to check it in detail yet.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
nks@flawful.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
georgi.djakov@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:00:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016060021.sotk72u4hioctg7o@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016042434.org6ibdqsqbzcdww@vireshk-i7>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-10-20, 19:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > OK, this breaks with SCMI which doesn't provide clocks but manage OPPs
> > directly. Before this change clk_get(dev..) was allowed to fail and
> > --EPROBE_DEFER was not an error.
>
> I think the change in itself is fine. We should be returning from
> there if we get EPROBE_DEFER. The question is rather why are you
> getting EPROBE_DEFER here ?
>
Ah OK, I didn't spend too much time, saw -EPROBE_DEFER, just reverted
this patch and it worked. I need to check it in detail yet.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 9:09 [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24 9:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24 9:09 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24 14:25 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-24 14:25 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2020-08-25 4:29 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20200901085708eucas1p231ccacd7b41685ece92ee21e3b726f28@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-09-01 8:57 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-01 9:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-09-01 10:05 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-01 10:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-13 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-13 9:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-14 16:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-16 5:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16 6:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-16 8:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-27 16:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-28 5:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28 9:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-28 9:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24 9:17 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-08-24 9:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-08-24 11:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-08-24 11:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-08-24 11:39 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-08-24 11:39 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-10-15 18:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-15 18:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 4:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16 4:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16 6:00 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-10-16 6:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 11:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 15:28 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-10-16 15:28 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-10-19 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 9:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 9:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 10:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 10:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 14:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 14:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 5:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 5:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 9:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20 9:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20 9:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 9:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 9:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20 9:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20 9:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20 9:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-27 22:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-27 22:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-28 4:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28 4:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28 17:29 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201016060021.sotk72u4hioctg7o@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nks@flawful.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.