[tipc-discussion] [net v2 1/1] tipc: fix memory leak caused by tipc_buf_append()

* [tipc-discussion] [net v2 1/1] tipc: fix memory leak caused by tipc_buf_append()
@ 2020-10-26 10:43 Tung Nguyen
  2020-10-26 18:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-10-27 18:21 ` Cong Wang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tung Nguyen @ 2020-10-26 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, netdev, tipc-discussion

Commit ed42989eab57 ("fix the skb_unshare() in tipc_buf_append()")
replaced skb_unshare() with skb_copy() to not reduce the data reference
counter of the original skb intentionally. This is not the correct
way to handle the cloned skb because it causes memory leak in 2
following cases:
 1/ Sending multicast messages via broadcast link
  The original skb list is cloned to the local skb list for local
  destination. After that, the data reference counter of each skb
  in the original list has the value of 2. This causes each skb not
  to be freed after receiving ACK:
  tipc_link_advance_transmq()
  {
   ...
   /* release skb */
   __skb_unlink(skb, &l->transmq);
   kfree_skb(skb); <-- memory exists after being freed
  }

 2/ Sending multicast messages via replicast link
  Similar to the above case, each skb cannot be freed after purging
  the skb list:
  tipc_mcast_xmit()
  {
   ...
   __skb_queue_purge(pkts); <-- memory exists after being freed
  }

This commit fixes this issue by using skb_unshare() instead. Besides,
to avoid use-after-free error reported by KASAN, the pointer to the
fragment is set to NULL before calling skb_unshare() to make sure that
the original skb is not freed after freeing the fragment 2 times in
case skb_unshare() returns NULL.

Fixes: ed42989eab57 ("fix the skb_unshare() in tipc_buf_append()")
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Thang Hoang Ngo <thang.h.ngo@dektech.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>
---
 net/tipc/msg.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/msg.c b/net/tipc/msg.c
index 2a78aa701572..32c79c59052b 100644
--- a/net/tipc/msg.c
+++ b/net/tipc/msg.c
@@ -150,12 +150,11 @@ int tipc_buf_append(struct sk_buff **headbuf, struct sk_buff **buf)
 	if (fragid == FIRST_FRAGMENT) {
 		if (unlikely(head))
 			goto err;
-		if (skb_cloned(frag))
-			frag = skb_copy(frag, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		*buf = NULL;
+		frag = skb_unshare(frag, GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (unlikely(!frag))
 			goto err;
 		head = *headbuf = frag;
-		*buf = NULL;
 		TIPC_SKB_CB(head)->tail = NULL;
 		if (skb_is_nonlinear(head)) {
 			skb_walk_frags(head, tail) {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread