From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:38:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026143801.GA122988@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021123437.21538-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:34:34 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
> data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Remove HAS_DMA guards
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:38:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026143801.GA122988@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021123437.21538-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:34:34 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
> data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Remove HAS_DMA guards
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:38:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026143801.GA122988@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021123437.21538-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:34:34 +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT
> data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Remove HAS_DMA guards
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-21 12:34 [PATCH v4 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: mm: Move zone_dma_bits initialization into zone_sizes_init() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-22 12:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-22 12:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-22 12:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-22 14:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-22 14:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-22 14:03 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-26 14:38 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-10-26 14:38 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-26 14:38 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on devicetree's dma-ranges Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-22 18:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-22 18:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-22 18:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-23 15:27 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-23 15:27 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-23 15:27 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-23 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-23 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-23 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-10-28 11:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-10-28 11:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-10-28 11:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-10-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mm: Remove examples from enum zone_type comment Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-21 12:34 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-23 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-23 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-23 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-23 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-23 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA Jeremy Linton
2020-10-23 19:05 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-10-23 19:05 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-10-23 19:05 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-27 11:50 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201026143801.GA122988@bogus \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.