All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: merge at91_adc_probe_dt back in at91_adc_probe
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:19:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114191934.GB5272@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201114170804.4b51c84b@archlinux>

On 14/11/2020 17:08:04+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > -	ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +	st->caps = (struct at91_adc_caps *)
> > +		of_match_device(at91_adc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev)->data;
> 
> of_device_get match_data  - obviously an unrelated change but trivial enough
> I'd just slip it in this patch (unless you have it a later one!)
> 
> That returns a void * so no need for the cast.
> 

I guess I will change the next patch to use of_device_get_match_data as
Andy doesn't like it when the fo_ and device_ APIs are mixed.

> > +	st->registers = &st->caps->registers;
> > +	st->num_channels = st->caps->num_channels;
> > +
> > +	/* Check if touchscreen is supported. */
> > +	if (st->caps->has_ts) {
> > +		ret = at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(node, st, &idev->dev);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, idev);
> >  
> > @@ -1091,7 +1072,6 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(st->reg_base))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(st->reg_base);
> >  
> > -
> Stray change that shouldn't be in this patch ideally but not that important.
> 

I know I sneaked this one in but I didn't want to have that as a separate
patch ;). I'll drop it.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: merge at91_adc_probe_dt back in at91_adc_probe
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:19:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114191934.GB5272@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201114170804.4b51c84b@archlinux>

On 14/11/2020 17:08:04+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > -	ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +	st->caps = (struct at91_adc_caps *)
> > +		of_match_device(at91_adc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev)->data;
> 
> of_device_get match_data  - obviously an unrelated change but trivial enough
> I'd just slip it in this patch (unless you have it a later one!)
> 
> That returns a void * so no need for the cast.
> 

I guess I will change the next patch to use of_device_get_match_data as
Andy doesn't like it when the fo_ and device_ APIs are mixed.

> > +	st->registers = &st->caps->registers;
> > +	st->num_channels = st->caps->num_channels;
> > +
> > +	/* Check if touchscreen is supported. */
> > +	if (st->caps->has_ts) {
> > +		ret = at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(node, st, &idev->dev);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, idev);
> >  
> > @@ -1091,7 +1072,6 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(st->reg_base))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(st->reg_base);
> >  
> > -
> Stray change that shouldn't be in this patch ideally but not that important.
> 

I know I sneaked this one in but I didn't want to have that as a separate
patch ;). I'll drop it.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-14 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-13 21:26 [PATCH 0/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: cleanup DT bindings Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: remove platform data Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: rework resolution selection Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 16:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 16:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings:iio:adc:atmel,sama9260-adc: conversion to yaml from at91_adc.txt Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings:iio:adc:atmel, sama9260-adc: " Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 16:53   ` [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings:iio:adc:atmel,sama9260-adc: " Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 16:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 4/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: rework trigger definition Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 17:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 19:16     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 19:16       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 5/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: merge at91_adc_probe_dt back in at91_adc_probe Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 17:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:15     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:15       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 19:19     ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2020-11-14 19:19       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 6/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: remove forward declaration Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 17:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 7/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: use devm_input_allocate_device Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 17:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 19:22     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 19:22       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d3: use proper ADC compatible Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: at91: remove deprecated ADC properties Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-13 21:26   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-14 17:17 ` [PATCH 0/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: cleanup DT bindings Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-14 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16  6:32 ` Ludovic Desroches
2020-11-16  6:32   ` Ludovic Desroches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201114191934.GB5272@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.