Error: invalid switch -me200

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2039 bytes --]

Hi Fangrui,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   4 months ago
config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags linus master
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 24128 bytes --]

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2082 bytes --]

Hi Fangrui,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   4 months ago
config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags linus master
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 24128 bytes --]

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Fāng-ruì Sòng]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fangrui,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> date:   4 months ago
> config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
>         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
>         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>         git fetch --no-tags linus master
>         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    Assembler messages:
> >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
>    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
>    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
-me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)

(In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
support may get less attention in LLVM.)

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Fāng-ruì Sòng]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2803 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fangrui,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> date:   4 months ago
> config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
>         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
>         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>         git fetch --no-tags linus master
>         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    Assembler messages:
> >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
>    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
>    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
-me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)

(In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
support may get less attention in LLVM.)

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fangrui,
> >
> > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> >
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > date:   4 months ago
> > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    Assembler messages:
> > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> 
> This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> 
> (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> support may get less attention in LLVM.)

This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.

$ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
...
Error: invalid switch -me200
Error: unrecognized option -me200
...

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nathan Chancellor]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3261 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fangrui,
> >
> > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> >
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > date:   4 months ago
> > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    Assembler messages:
> > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> 
> This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> 
> (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> support may get less attention in LLVM.)

This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.

$ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
...
Error: invalid switch -me200
Error: unrecognized option -me200
...

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

+ MPE, PPC

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Fangrui,
> > >
> > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > >
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > date:   4 months ago
> > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)

^ randconfig

> > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > >    Assembler messages:
> > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> >
> > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> >
> > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
>
> This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
>
> $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux

Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

> ...
> Error: invalid switch -me200
> Error: unrecognized option -me200

There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500

Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
randconfig can select these when it should not?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

+ MPE, PPC

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Fangrui,
> > >
> > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > >
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > date:   4 months ago
> > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)

^ randconfig

> > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > >    Assembler messages:
> > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> >
> > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> >
> > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
>
> This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
>
> $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux

Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

> ...
> Error: invalid switch -me200
> Error: unrecognized option -me200

There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500

Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
randconfig can select these when it should not?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3979 bytes --]

+ MPE, PPC

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Fangrui,
> > >
> > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > >
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > date:   4 months ago
> > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)

^ randconfig

> > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > >    Assembler messages:
> > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> >
> > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> >
> > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
>
> This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
>
> $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux

Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

> ...
> Error: invalid switch -me200
> Error: unrecognized option -me200

There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500

Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
randconfig can select these when it should not?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> + MPE, PPC
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > >
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> 
> ^ randconfig
> 
> > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> > >
> > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > >
> > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> >
> > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> >
> > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> 
> Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.

> > ...
> > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> 
> There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> 
> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> randconfig can select these when it should not?

Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:

https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/

Guess this config should be eliminated?

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> + MPE, PPC
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > >
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> 
> ^ randconfig
> 
> > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> > >
> > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > >
> > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> >
> > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> >
> > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> 
> Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.

> > ...
> > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> 
> There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> 
> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> randconfig can select these when it should not?

Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:

https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/

Guess this config should be eliminated?

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nathan Chancellor]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4538 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> + MPE, PPC
> 
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > >
> > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> 
> ^ randconfig
> 
> > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> > >
> > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > >
> > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> >
> > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> >
> > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> 
> Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?

Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.

> > ...
> > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> 
> There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> 
> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> randconfig can select these when it should not?

Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:

https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/

Guess this config should be eliminated?

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:04 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > + MPE, PPC
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > > >
> > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> >
> > ^ randconfig
> >
> > > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > > >
> > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > >
> > > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> > > >
> > > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > > >
> > > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> > >
> > > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> > >
> > > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> >
> > Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?
>
> Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.
>
> > > ...
> > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> >
> > There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> > 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> > 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> > 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> > as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> >
> > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > randconfig can select these when it should not?
>
> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>
> Guess this config should be eliminated?

If we're going to get pestered by 0day bot randconfigs over code
that's not possible to build, I'm all for deleting it.  I doubt we'll
be seeing patches from anyone to binutils for supporting these.

What has the kernel's policy been for code in tree that other folks
can't build (without proprietary tools)? (ARCH=hexagon is pretty close
to not toeing the line here, not sure ICC actually works either).
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:04 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > + MPE, PPC
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > > >
> > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> >
> > ^ randconfig
> >
> > > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > > >
> > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > >
> > > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> > > >
> > > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > > >
> > > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> > >
> > > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> > >
> > > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> >
> > Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?
>
> Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.
>
> > > ...
> > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> >
> > There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> > 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> > 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> > 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> > as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> >
> > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > randconfig can select these when it should not?
>
> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>
> Guess this config should be eliminated?

If we're going to get pestered by 0day bot randconfigs over code
that's not possible to build, I'm all for deleting it.  I doubt we'll
be seeing patches from anyone to binutils for supporting these.

What has the kernel's policy been for code in tree that other folks
can't build (without proprietary tools)? (ARCH=hexagon is pretty close
to not toeing the line here, not sure ICC actually works either).
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Nick Desaulniers]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5235 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:04 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > + MPE, PPC
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:28:03AM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Fangrui,
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > > > >
> > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > > > head:   585e5b17b92dead8a3aca4e3c9876fbca5f7e0ba
> > > > > commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
> > > > > date:   4 months ago
> > > > > config: powerpc-randconfig-r031-20201113 (attached as .config)
> >
> > ^ randconfig
> >
> > > > > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9e0c35655b6e8186baef8840b26ba4090503b554)
> > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > > >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > > >         # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
> > > > >         # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
> > > > >         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > > > >         git fetch --no-tags linus master
> > > > >         git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
> > > > >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > > >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> > > > >
> > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > >
> > > > >    Assembler messages:
> > > > > >> Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > >> Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >    clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > > >    make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> > > > >    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
> > > > >    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >    make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
> > > > >    make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > > > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> > > >
> > > > This can be ignored. The LLVM integrated assembler does not recognize
> > > > -me200 (-Wa,-me200 in arch/powerpc/Makefile). I guess the GNU as -m
> > > > option is similar to .arch or .machine and controls what instructions
> > > > are recognized. The integrated assembler tends to support all
> > > > instructions (conditional supporting some instructions has some
> > > > challenges; in the end I have patched parsing but ignoring `.arch` for
> > > > x86-64 and ignoring `.machine ppc64` for ppc64)
> > > >
> > > > (In addition, e200 is a 32-bit Power ISA microprocessor. 32-bit
> > > > support may get less attention in LLVM.)
> > >
> > > This is also not a clang specific issue, I see the exact same error
> > > with GCC 10.2.0 and binutils 2.35.
> > >
> > > $ make -skj64 ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux- olddefconfig vmlinux
> >
> > Does using a non 64b triple produce the same failure?
>
> Yes, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- produces the same failure.
>
> > > ...
> > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> >
> > There's a block in  arch/powerpc/Makefile:
> > 248 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)    += -Wa,-m405
> > 249 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)    += -Wa,-m440
> > 250 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)  += $(call
> > as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > 252 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)   += -Wa,-me500
> >
> > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > randconfig can select these when it should not?
>
> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
>
> Guess this config should be eliminated?

If we're going to get pestered by 0day bot randconfigs over code
that's not possible to build, I'm all for deleting it.  I doubt we'll
be seeing patches from anyone to binutils for supporting these.

What has the kernel's policy been for code in tree that other folks
can't build (without proprietary tools)? (ARCH=hexagon is pretty close
to not toeing the line here, not sure ICC actually works either).
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >
> > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > >
> > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> >
> > Guess this config should be eliminated?

The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?

Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >
> > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > >
> > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> >
> > Guess this config should be eliminated?

The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?

Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Fāng-ruì Sòng]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >
> > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > >
> > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > >
> > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > >
> > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
>
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>
>
> Segher

CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.

Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
The topic started at
http://lore.kernel.org/r/202011131146.g8dPLQDD-lkp@intel.com and
people would like to get rid of some options (if possible).

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Fāng-ruì Sòng]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >
> > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > >
> > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > >
> > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > >
> > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
>
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>
>
> Segher

CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.

Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
The topic started at
http://lore.kernel.org/r/202011131146.g8dPLQDD-lkp@intel.com and
people would like to get rid of some options (if possible).

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Fāng-ruì Sòng]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1293 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > >
> > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > >
> > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > >
> > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
> > >
> > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
>
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>
>
> Segher

CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.

Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
The topic started at
http://lore.kernel.org/r/202011131146.g8dPLQDD-lkp(a)intel.com and
people would like to get rid of some options (if possible).

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >
> > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > >
> > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > >
> > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> >
> > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> >
> > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> 
> CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> 
> Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?

All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
instead.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > >
> > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > >
> > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > >
> > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> >
> > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> >
> > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> 
> CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> 
> Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?

All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
instead.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>
>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>
>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>
>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>
>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
> 
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> 
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> 

I don't have much clue on this.

But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)

What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):

valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "

https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049

Apparently based on binutils 2.28

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf

But that's not exactly -me200 though.

Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
at all ?

Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>
>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>
>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>
>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>
>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
> 
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> 
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> 

I don't have much clue on this.

But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)

What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):

valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "

https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049

Apparently based on binutils 2.28

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf

But that's not exactly -me200 though.

Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
at all ?

Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1973 bytes --]



Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>
>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>
>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>
>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
>>>
>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
> 
> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> 
> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> 

I don't have much clue on this.

But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)

What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):

valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "

https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049

Apparently based on binutils 2.28

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf

But that's not exactly -me200 though.

Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
at all ?

Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Michael Ellerman]

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>
>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>
>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>
>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>> 
>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>> 
>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>> 
>
> I don't have much clue on this.

Me either.

> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>
> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>
> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>
> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>
> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>
> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>
> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>
> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
> at all ?

There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
extent then:

  3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to e200/e500 cores")


Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?

AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call cc-option,-mno-string)
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
-cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500

 # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4


So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

I tried booting the resulting kernel in qemu, but I get:

  $ qemu-system-ppc -M none -cpu e200 -kernel build\~/vmlinux
  Error: Trying to register SPR 574 (23e) twice !


Which is not related AFAIK and indicates the qemu support is broken.

Unless we hear from someone that they're using mainline on an e200 then
it seems like it's a candidate for removal.

cheers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Michael Ellerman]

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>
>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>
>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>
>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>> 
>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>> 
>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>> 
>
> I don't have much clue on this.

Me either.

> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>
> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>
> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>
> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>
> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>
> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>
> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>
> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
> at all ?

There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
extent then:

  3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to e200/e500 cores")


Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?

AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call cc-option,-mno-string)
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
-cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500

 # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4


So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

I tried booting the resulting kernel in qemu, but I get:

  $ qemu-system-ppc -M none -cpu e200 -kernel build\~/vmlinux
  Error: Trying to register SPR 574 (23e) twice !


Which is not related AFAIK and indicates the qemu support is broken.

Unless we hear from someone that they're using mainline on an e200 then
it seems like it's a candidate for removal.

cheers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Michael Ellerman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3420 bytes --]

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>
>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>
>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>
>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>> 
>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>> 
>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>> 
>
> I don't have much clue on this.

Me either.

> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>
> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>
> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603 
> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2 
> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500 e6500 ec603e native power3 power4 
> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64 powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>
> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>
> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>
> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>
> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>
> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that worth keeping it in the kernel 
> at all ?

There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
extent then:

  3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to e200/e500 cores")


Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?

AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call cc-option,-mno-string)
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
-cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500

 # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4


So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

I tried booting the resulting kernel in qemu, but I get:

  $ qemu-system-ppc -M none -cpu e200 -kernel build\~/vmlinux
  Error: Trying to register SPR 574 (23e) twice !


Which is not related AFAIK and indicates the qemu support is broken.

Unless we hear from someone that they're using mainline on an e200 then
it seems like it's a candidate for removal.

cheers

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

Quoting Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>:

> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>>>
>>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>>>
>>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>>>
>>
>> I don't have much clue on this.
>
> Me either.
>
>> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc  
>> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>>
>> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes  
>> aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>>
>> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464  
>> 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603
>> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860  
>> 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500  
>> e6500 ec603e native power3 power4
>> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64  
>> powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>>
>> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>>
>> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>>
>> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>>
>> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>>
>> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that  
>> worth keeping it in the kernel
>> at all ?
>
> There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
> extent then:
>
>   3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to  
> e200/e500 cores")

Not sure, that patch seems to be focussed on the new e500mc

>
>
> Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?
>
> AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call  
> cc-option,-mno-string)
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> -cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500
>
>  # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4
>
>
> So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

Or we could do

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype  
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index c194c4ae8bc7..a11cf9431e1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ config 44x
  	select PHYS_64BIT

  config E200
+	depends on $(cc-option,-me200)
  	bool "Freescale e200"

  endchoice
---
Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

Quoting Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>:

> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>>>
>>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>>>
>>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>>>
>>
>> I don't have much clue on this.
>
> Me either.
>
>> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc  
>> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>>
>> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes  
>> aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>>
>> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464  
>> 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603
>> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860  
>> 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500  
>> e6500 ec603e native power3 power4
>> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64  
>> powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>>
>> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>>
>> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>>
>> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>>
>> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>>
>> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that  
>> worth keeping it in the kernel
>> at all ?
>
> There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
> extent then:
>
>   3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to  
> e200/e500 cores")

Not sure, that patch seems to be focussed on the new e500mc

>
>
> Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?
>
> AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call  
> cc-option,-mno-string)
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> -cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500
>
>  # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4
>
>
> So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

Or we could do

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype  
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index c194c4ae8bc7..a11cf9431e1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ config 44x
  	select PHYS_64BIT

  config E200
+	depends on $(cc-option,-me200)
  	bool "Freescale e200"

  endchoice
---
Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Christophe Leroy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3708 bytes --]


Quoting Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>:

> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>>>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>>>>>>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
>>>>>> randconfig can select these when it should not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
>>>>> a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Guess this config should be eliminated?
>>>
>>> The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
>>> and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
>>> thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
>>>
>>> Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
>>>
>>
>> I don't have much clue on this.
>
> Me either.
>
>> But I see on wikipedia that e5500 is a 64 bits powerpc  
>> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC_e5500)
>>
>> What I see is that NXP seems to provide a GCC version that includes  
>> aditionnal cpu (e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7):
>>
>> valid arguments to '-mcpu=' are: 401 403 405 405fp 440 440fp 464  
>> 464fp 476 476fp 505 601 602 603
>> 603e 604 604e 620 630 740 7400 7450 750 801 821 823 8540 8548 860  
>> 970 G3 G4 G5 a2 cell e200z0 e200z2
>> e200z3 e200z4 e200z6 e200z7 e300c2 e300c3 e500mc e500mc64 e5500  
>> e6500 ec603e native power3 power4
>> power5 power5+ power6 power6x power7 power8 powerpc powerpc64  
>> powerpc64le rs64 titan "
>>
>> https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/GCC-generating-not-implemented-instructions/m-p/845049
>>
>> Apparently based on binutils 2.28
>>
>> https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/release-note/S32DS-POWER-v1-2-RN.pdf
>>
>> But that's not exactly -me200 though.
>>
>> Now, I can't see any defconfig that selects CONFIG_E200, so is that  
>> worth keeping it in the kernel
>> at all ?
>
> There was a commit in 2014 that suggests it worked at least to some
> extent then:
>
>   3477e71d5319 ("powerpc/booke: Restrict SPE exception handlers to  
> e200/e500 cores")

Not sure, that patch seems to be focussed on the new e500mc

>
>
> Presumably there was a non-upstream toolchain where it was supported?
>
> AFAICS the kernel builds OK with just the cpu-as modification removed:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> index a4d56f0a41d9..16b8336f91dd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS               += $(call  
> cc-option,-mno-string)
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_40x)           += -Wa,-m405
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_44x)           += -Wa,-m440
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)       += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-maltivec)
> -cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)          += -Wa,-me200
>  cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E500)          += -Wa,-me500
>
>  # When using '-many -mpower4' gas will first try and find a matching power4
>
>
> So that seems like the obvious fix for now.

Or we could do

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype  
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
index c194c4ae8bc7..a11cf9431e1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ config 44x
  	select PHYS_64BIT

  config E200
+	depends on $(cc-option,-me200)
  	bool "Freescale e200"

  endchoice
---
Christophe

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Scott Wood]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils?
> > > > > There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > > 
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > > 
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> instead.

According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
platform support having ever been added).  e5500 is completely different (64-
bit version of e500mc).

-Scott

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Scott Wood]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils?
> > > > > There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > > 
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > > 
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> instead.

According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
platform support having ever been added).  e5500 is completely different (64-
bit version of e500mc).

-Scott

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Scott Wood]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1741 bytes --]

On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils?
> > > > > There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > > 
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > > 
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> instead.

According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
platform support having ever been added).  e5500 is completely different (64-
bit version of e500mc).

-Scott

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:27:12PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> > doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> > instead.
> 
> According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
> platform support having ever been added).  e5500 is completely different (64-
> bit version of e500mc).

Ah yes, confusing processor numbers :-(  That explains, sorry.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:27:12PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 18:50 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> > doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).  Perhaps -me5500 will work for it
> > instead.
> 
> According to Wikipedia e200 is from mpc55xx (for which I don't see any
> platform support having ever been added).  e5500 is completely different (64-
> bit version of e500mc).

Ah yes, confusing processor numbers :-(  That explains, sorry.


Segher

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Alan Modra]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:50:15PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > >
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > >
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).

Right, and a quick check says it never existed.  There is e200z4,
added to binutils with dfdaec14b0d, 2016-08-01, but the kernel -me200
was added in 2005.  I suspect the toolchain support only existed
inside Freescale and pushing it upstream was too difficult.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Alan Modra]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:50:15PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > >
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > >
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).

Right, and a quick check says it never existed.  There is e200z4,
added to binutils with dfdaec14b0d, 2016-08-01, but the kernel -me200
was added in 2005.  I suspect the toolchain support only existed
inside Freescale and pushing it upstream was too difficult.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

[Alan Modra]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1808 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:50:15PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:37:38PM -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:23 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200)   += -Wa,-me200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > > > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > > > > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E(a)kernel.crashing.org/
> > > > >
> > > > > Guess this config should be eliminated?
> > >
> > > The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
> > > and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
> > > thing, too).  But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
> > >
> > > Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
> > 
> > CC Alan Modra, a binutils global maintainer.
> > 
> > Alan, can the few -Wa,-m* options deleted from arch/powerpc/Makefile ?
> 
> All the others work fine (and are needed afaics), it is only -me200 that
> doesn't exist (in mainline binutils).

Right, and a quick check says it never existed.  There is e200z4,
added to binutils with dfdaec14b0d, 2016-08-01, but the kernel -me200
was added in 2005.  I suspect the toolchain support only existed
inside Freescale and pushing it upstream was too difficult.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2047 bytes --]

Hi Fangrui,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   472e5b056f000a778abb41f1e443de58eb259783
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   2 months ago
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r022-20201002 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bcd05599d0e53977a963799d6ee4f6e0bc21331b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags linus master
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 27188 bytes --]

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2090 bytes --]

Hi Fangrui,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   472e5b056f000a778abb41f1e443de58eb259783
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   2 months ago
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r022-20201002 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bcd05599d0e53977a963799d6ee4f6e0bc21331b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags linus master
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 27188 bytes --]

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1719 bytes --]

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   6ba1b005ffc388c2aeaddae20da29e4810dea298
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   7 days ago
config: powerpc-randconfig-r014-20200729 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 417d3d495f1cfb0a2f7b60d00829925126fdcfd9)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26260 bytes --]

Error: invalid switch -me200

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1755 bytes --]

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   6ba1b005ffc388c2aeaddae20da29e4810dea298
commit: ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51 Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang cross compilation
date:   7 days ago
config: powerpc-randconfig-r014-20200729 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 417d3d495f1cfb0a2f7b60d00829925126fdcfd9)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
        git checkout ca9b31f6bb9c6aa9b4e5f0792f39a97bbffb8c51
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Assembler messages:
>> Error: invalid switch -me200
>> Error: unrecognized option -me200
   clang-12: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
   make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:1174: prepare0] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:185: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26260 bytes --]