All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata()
@ 2020-11-19 14:21 Alexandru Ardelean
  2020-11-19 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandru Ardelean @ 2020-11-19 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: nandor.han, semi.malinen, linus.walleij, bgolaszewski,
	Alexandru Ardelean

There is no matching spi_get_drvdata() call in the driver, so there is no
need to do spi_set_drvdata(). This looks like it probably was copied from a
driver that used both spi_set_drvdata() & spi_get_drvdata().

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
index e2cac12092af..49c878cfd5c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
@@ -186,15 +186,7 @@ static int xra1403_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(&spi->dev, "Unable to register gpiochip\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	spi_set_drvdata(spi, xra);
-
-	return 0;
+	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
 }
 
 static const struct spi_device_id xra1403_ids[] = {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata()
  2020-11-19 14:21 [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata() Alexandru Ardelean
@ 2020-11-19 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2020-11-30 16:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-11-19 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandru Ardelean
  Cc: open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Nandor Han,
	Semi Malinen, Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:17 PM Alexandru Ardelean
<alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>
> There is no matching spi_get_drvdata() call in the driver, so there is no
> need to do spi_set_drvdata(). This looks like it probably was copied from a
> driver that used both spi_set_drvdata() & spi_get_drvdata().

While above luckily (*) okay it may not always be the case.

*) it can be paired with dev_get_drvdata() which is usual for PM callbacks.

With amended commit message
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c | 10 +---------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> index e2cac12092af..49c878cfd5c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> @@ -186,15 +186,7 @@ static int xra1403_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               dev_err(&spi->dev, "Unable to register gpiochip\n");
> -               return ret;
> -       }
> -
> -       spi_set_drvdata(spi, xra);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
>  }
>
>  static const struct spi_device_id xra1403_ids[] = {
> --
> 2.17.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata()
  2020-11-19 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-11-30 16:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  2020-11-30 17:16     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2020-11-30 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Alexandru Ardelean, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Nandor Han, Semi Malinen,
	Linus Walleij

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:17 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is no matching spi_get_drvdata() call in the driver, so there is no
> > need to do spi_set_drvdata(). This looks like it probably was copied from a
> > driver that used both spi_set_drvdata() & spi_get_drvdata().
>
> While above luckily (*) okay it may not always be the case.
>
> *) it can be paired with dev_get_drvdata() which is usual for PM callbacks.
>
> With amended commit message
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>

I applied this patch. I wasn't sure exactly how you want the commit
message to be changed - it sounds pretty clear to me so I took it.

Bartosz

> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c | 10 +---------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> > index e2cac12092af..49c878cfd5c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xra1403.c
> > @@ -186,15 +186,7 @@ static int xra1403_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> >
> > -       ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
> > -       if (ret < 0) {
> > -               dev_err(&spi->dev, "Unable to register gpiochip\n");
> > -               return ret;
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       spi_set_drvdata(spi, xra);
> > -
> > -       return 0;
> > +       return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&spi->dev, &xra->chip, xra);
> >  }
> >
> >  static const struct spi_device_id xra1403_ids[] = {
> > --
> > 2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata()
  2020-11-30 16:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2020-11-30 17:16     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-11-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartosz Golaszewski
  Cc: Alexandru Ardelean, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Nandor Han, Linus Walleij

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:37 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:17 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> > <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is no matching spi_get_drvdata() call in the driver, so there is no
> > > need to do spi_set_drvdata(). This looks like it probably was copied from a
> > > driver that used both spi_set_drvdata() & spi_get_drvdata().
> >
> > While above luckily (*) okay it may not always be the case.
> >
> > *) it can be paired with dev_get_drvdata() which is usual for PM callbacks.
> >
> > With amended commit message
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> >
>
> I applied this patch. I wasn't sure exactly how you want the commit
> message to be changed - it sounds pretty clear to me so I took it.

For example, by adding " or dev_get_drvdata()" to the end.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-30 17:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-19 14:21 [PATCH] gpio: xra1403: remove unneeded spi_set_drvdata() Alexandru Ardelean
2020-11-19 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 16:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-11-30 17:16     ` Andy Shevchenko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.