* [PATCH] blk-mq: Make running from the wrong CPU less scary
@ 2020-11-26 9:51 Daniel Wagner
2020-11-27 2:40 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Wagner @ 2020-11-26 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-kernel, Ming Lei, Daniel Wagner
The current warning looks aweful like a proper crash. This is
confusing. There is not much information to gained from the stack
trace anyway, let's drop it.
While at it print the cpumask as there might be additial helpful
information when debugging the sitation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
Hi,
We got a report from a customer because he was concerned about the log
entries. As it turns out, it fooled me too to be honest. What do you
think about making it a bit less look-a-like a kernel oops?
smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 12 APIC 0x26
WARNING, didn't collect load info for all cpus, balancing is broken
run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
CPU: 0 PID: 42300 Comm: kworker/13:2H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE X 5.3.18-109.$
Hardware name: IBM System x3650 M5 -[5462AC1]-/00KG915, BIOS -[TCE144J-3.11]- 12/03/2019
Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x66/0x8b
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xee/0x100
process_one_work+0x1f4/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x2d/0x3e0
? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
kthread+0x10d/0x130
? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
CPU: 0 PID: 42300 Comm: kworker/13:2H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE X 5.3.18-109.$
Hardware name: IBM System x3650 M5 -[5462AC1]-/00KG915, BIOS -[TCE144J-3.11]- 12/03/2019
Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
Thanks,
Daniel
block/blk-mq.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 55bcee5dc032..0427b719d9c4 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1514,10 +1514,8 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
- raw_smp_processor_id(),
- cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
- dump_stack();
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %*pbl\n",
+ raw_smp_processor_id(), cpumask_pr_args(hctx->cpumask));
}
/*
--
2.16.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Make running from the wrong CPU less scary
2020-11-26 9:51 [PATCH] blk-mq: Make running from the wrong CPU less scary Daniel Wagner
@ 2020-11-27 2:40 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-11-27 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Wagner; +Cc: linux-block, Jens Axboe, linux-kernel
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The current warning looks aweful like a proper crash. This is
> confusing. There is not much information to gained from the stack
> trace anyway, let's drop it.
>
> While at it print the cpumask as there might be additial helpful
> information when debugging the sitation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> We got a report from a customer because he was concerned about the log
> entries. As it turns out, it fooled me too to be honest. What do you
> think about making it a bit less look-a-like a kernel oops?
>
>
> smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 12 APIC 0x26
> WARNING, didn't collect load info for all cpus, balancing is broken
> run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
> CPU: 0 PID: 42300 Comm: kworker/13:2H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE X 5.3.18-109.$
> Hardware name: IBM System x3650 M5 -[5462AC1]-/00KG915, BIOS -[TCE144J-3.11]- 12/03/2019
> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x66/0x8b
> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xee/0x100
> process_one_work+0x1f4/0x3e0
> worker_thread+0x2d/0x3e0
> ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
> kthread+0x10d/0x130
> ? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
> CPU: 0 PID: 42300 Comm: kworker/13:2H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE X 5.3.18-109.$
> Hardware name: IBM System x3650 M5 -[5462AC1]-/00KG915, BIOS -[TCE144J-3.11]- 12/03/2019
> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 55bcee5dc032..0427b719d9c4 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1514,10 +1514,8 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> */
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
> cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
> - raw_smp_processor_id(),
> - cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
> - dump_stack();
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %*pbl\n",
> + raw_smp_processor_id(), cpumask_pr_args(hctx->cpumask));
> }
Now we have guaranteed that no any requests originated from one hctx exists
when this hctx is going to offline, which is strong enough for killing the check.
The reason why such warning is triggered is that wq's cpu hot unplug is
handled before blk-mq's handling.
I'd suggest to kill the whole branch in the fast path.
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-27 2:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-26 9:51 [PATCH] blk-mq: Make running from the wrong CPU less scary Daniel Wagner
2020-11-27 2:40 ` Ming Lei
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.