All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"David Binderman" <dcb314@hotmail.com>,
	"Babu Moger" <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:20:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130202010.178373-11-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130202010.178373-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

MBM unit test starts fill_buf (default built-in benchmark) in a new con_mon
group (c1, m1) and records resctrl reported mbm values and iMC (Integrated
Memory Controller) values every second. It does this for five seconds
(randomly chosen value) in total. It then calculates average of resctrl_mbm
values and imc_mbm values and if the difference is greater than 300 MB/sec
(randomly chosen value), the test treats it as a failure. MBA unit test is
similar to MBM but after every run it changes schemata.

Checking for a difference of 300 MB/sec doesn't look very meaningful when
the mbm values are changing over a wide range. For example, below are the
values running MBA test on SKL with different allocations

1. With 10% as schemata both iMC and resctrl mbm_values are around 2000
   MB/sec
2. With 100% as schemata both iMC and resctrl mbm_values are around 10000
   MB/sec

A 300 MB/sec difference between resctrl_mbm and imc_mbm values is
acceptable at 100% schemata but it isn't acceptable at 10% schemata because
that's a huge difference.

So, fix this by checking for percentage difference instead of absolute
difference i.e. check if the difference between resctrl_mbm value and
imc_mbm value is within 5% (randomly chosen value) of imc_mbm value. If the
difference is greater than 5% of imc_mbm value, treat it is a failure.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 13 +++++++------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
index 6449fbd96096..b4c81d2ee53b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 #define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_mba"
 #define NUM_OF_RUNS		5
-#define MAX_DIFF		300
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	5
 #define ALLOCATION_MAX		100
 #define ALLOCATION_MIN		10
 #define ALLOCATION_STEP		10
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static void show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc)
 	     allocation++) {
 		unsigned long avg_bw_imc, avg_bw_resc;
 		unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;
-		unsigned long avg_diff;
+		int avg_diff_per;
+		float avg_diff;
 
 		/*
 		 * The first run is discarded due to inaccurate value from
@@ -76,17 +77,18 @@ static void show_mba_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc)
 
 		avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
 		avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / (NUM_OF_RUNS - 1);
-		avg_diff = labs((long)(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc));
+		avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
+		avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);
 
-		printf("%sok MBA schemata percentage %u smaller than %d %%\n",
-		       avg_diff > MAX_DIFF ? "not " : "",
-		       ALLOCATION_MAX - ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation,
-		       MAX_DIFF);
+		printf("%sok MBA: diff within %d%% for schemata %u\n",
+		       avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT ? "not " : "",
+		       MAX_DIFF_PERCENT,
+		       ALLOCATION_MAX - ALLOCATION_STEP * allocation);
 		tests_run++;
-		printf("# avg_diff: %lu\n", avg_diff);
+		printf("# avg_diff_per: %d%%\n", avg_diff_per);
 		printf("# avg_bw_imc: %lu\n", avg_bw_imc);
 		printf("# avg_bw_resc: %lu\n", avg_bw_resc);
-		if (avg_diff > MAX_DIFF)
+		if (avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT)
 			failed = true;
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index ec6cfe01c9c2..672d3ddd6e85 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #include "resctrl.h"
 
 #define RESULT_FILE_NAME	"result_mbm"
-#define MAX_DIFF		300
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	5
 #define NUM_OF_RUNS		5
 
 static void
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, int span)
 {
 	unsigned long avg_bw_imc = 0, avg_bw_resc = 0;
 	unsigned long sum_bw_imc = 0, sum_bw_resc = 0;
-	long avg_diff = 0;
-	int runs;
+	int runs, avg_diff_per;
+	float avg_diff = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Discard the first value which is inaccurate due to monitoring setup
@@ -33,12 +33,13 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long *bw_resc, int span)
 
 	avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / 4;
 	avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / 4;
-	avg_diff = avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc;
+	avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
+	avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);
 
 	printf("%sok MBM: diff within %d%%\n",
-	       labs(avg_diff) > MAX_DIFF ? "not " : "", MAX_DIFF);
+	       avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT ? "not " : "", MAX_DIFF_PERCENT);
 	tests_run++;
-	printf("# avg_diff: %lu\n", labs(avg_diff));
+	printf("# avg_diff_per: %d%%\n", avg_diff_per);
 	printf("# Span (MB): %d\n", span);
 	printf("# avg_bw_imc: %lu\n", avg_bw_imc);
 	printf("# avg_bw_resc: %lu\n", avg_bw_resc);
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 20:19 [PATCH v4 00/17] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix compilation issues for global variables Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  1:22   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] selftests/resctrl: Clean up resctrl features check Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:08   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix printed messages Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:25   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] selftests/resctrl: Add a few dependencies Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:29   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:32   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:35   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:36   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2021-01-26  2:38   ` [PATCH v4 10/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:38   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] selftests/resctrl: Don't hard code value of "no_of_bits" variable Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] selftests/resctrl: Modularize resctrl test suite main() function Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix unmount resctrl FS Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Fenghua Yu
2020-12-11  0:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Yu, Fenghua
2021-01-25 20:47 ` Fenghua Yu
2021-01-25 21:52   ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-25 21:54     ` Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  1:22 ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-26 23:57 ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130202010.178373-11-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dcb314@hotmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.