All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"David Binderman" <dcb314@hotmail.com>,
	"Babu Moger" <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 12/17] selftests/resctrl: Don't hard code value of "no_of_bits" variable
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:20:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130202010.178373-13-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130202010.178373-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

Cache related tests (like CAT and CMT) depend on a variable called
no_of_bits to run. no_of_bits defines the number of contiguous bits
that should be set in the CBM mask and a user can pass a value for
no_of_bits using -n command line argument. If a user hasn't passed any
value, it defaults to 5 (randomly chosen value).

Hard coding no_of_bits to 5 will make the cache tests fail to run on
systems that support maximum cbm mask that is less than or equal to 5 bits.
Hence, don't hard code no_of_bits value.

If a user passes a value for "no_of_bits" using -n option, use it.
Otherwise, no_of_bits is equal to half of the maximum number of bits in
the cbm mask.

Please note that CMT test is still hard coded to 5 bits. It will change in
subsequent patches that change CMT test.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c      | 5 ++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 6d9a41f3939a..6e935a6bb3e6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -147,7 +147,10 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
 	/* Get max number of bits from default-cabm mask */
 	count_of_bits = count_bits(long_mask);
 
-	if (n < 1 || n > count_of_bits - 1) {
+	if (!n)
+		n = count_of_bits / 2;
+
+	if (n > count_of_bits - 1) {
 		printf("Invalid input value for no_of_bits n!\n");
 		printf("Please Enter value in range 1 to %d\n",
 		       count_of_bits - 1);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index ef09e0ef2366..244f1beb75da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ void tests_cleanup(void)
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cmt_test = true;
-	int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 5;
+	int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 0;
 	char *benchmark_cmd[BENCHMARK_ARGS], bw_report[64], bm_type[64];
 	char benchmark_cmd_area[BENCHMARK_ARGS][BENCHMARK_ARG_SIZE];
 	int ben_ind, ben_count;
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			break;
 		case 'n':
 			no_of_bits = atoi(optarg);
+			if (no_of_bits <= 0) {
+				printf("Bail out! invalid argument for no_of_bits\n");
+				return -1;
+			}
 			break;
 		case 'h':
 			cmd_help();
@@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		printf("# Starting CMT test ...\n");
 		if (!has_ben)
 			sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cmt");
-		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
+		res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, 5, benchmark_cmd);
 		printf("%sok CMT: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
 		cmt_test_cleanup();
 		tests_run++;
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 20:19 [PATCH v4 00/17] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix compilation issues for global variables Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  1:22   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] selftests/resctrl: Clean up resctrl features check Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:08   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix printed messages Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:25   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] selftests/resctrl: Add a few dependencies Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:29   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] selftests/resctrl: Check for resctrl mount point only if resctrl FS is supported Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:32   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] selftests/resctrl: Use resctrl/info for feature detection Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:35   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:36   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:38   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] selftests/resctrl: Enable gcc checks to detect buffer overflows Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  2:38   ` Shuah Khan
2020-11-30 20:20 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] selftests/resctrl: Modularize resctrl test suite main() function Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] selftests/resctrl: Skip the test if requested resctrl feature is not supported Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix unmount resctrl FS Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix incorrect parsing of iMC counters Fenghua Yu
2020-11-30 20:20 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] selftests/resctrl: Fix checking for < 0 for unsigned values Fenghua Yu
2020-12-11  0:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Yu, Fenghua
2021-01-25 20:47 ` Fenghua Yu
2021-01-25 21:52   ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-25 21:54     ` Fenghua Yu
2021-01-26  1:22 ` Shuah Khan
2021-01-26 23:57 ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201130202010.178373-13-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dcb314@hotmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.