All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: sa11111: make sa1111 bus's remove callback return void
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 21:09:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204200927.p354eli7uqr776sp@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X8pOiU2a6BjfFuov@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1003 bytes --]

Hey Greg,

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:58:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
> > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> > make this function return void, let struct sa1111_driver::remove return
> > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes
> > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and ensures future
> > users behave accordingly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks, can I interpret this also as an Ack to take the change affecting
drivers/usb via Russell's tree?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: sa11111: make sa1111 bus's remove callback return void
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 21:09:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204200927.p354eli7uqr776sp@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X8pOiU2a6BjfFuov@kroah.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1003 bytes --]

Hey Greg,

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:58:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
> > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> > make this function return void, let struct sa1111_driver::remove return
> > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes
> > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and ensures future
> > users behave accordingly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks, can I interpret this also as an Ack to take the change affecting
drivers/usb via Russell's tree?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-26 11:47 [PATCH] ARM: sa11111: make sa1111 bus's remove callback return void Uwe Kleine-König
2020-11-26 11:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-02  3:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-12-02  3:15   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-12-04 14:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-04 14:58   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-04 20:09   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2020-12-04 20:09     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-05  8:23     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-05  8:23       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-05  8:26 ` Dominik Brodowski
2020-12-05  8:26   ` Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201204200927.p354eli7uqr776sp@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.