From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:55:33 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201217105533.GV3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201215185012.GA15566@willie-the-truck> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:50:12PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > IOW, any (accidental or otherwise) trip through a 32bit helper, will > > destroy user state (the affinity mask: 0x3c). > > Yes, that's correct, and I agree that it's a rough edge. If you're happy > with the idea of adding an extra mask to make this work, then I can start > hacking that up Yeah, I'm afraid we'll have to, this asymmetric muck is only going to get worse from here on. Anyway, I think we can avoid adding another cpumask_t to task_struct and do with a cpumask_t * insteads. After all, for 'normal' tasks, the task_cpu_possible_mask() will be cpu_possible_mask and we don't need to carry anything extra. Only once we hit one of these assymetric ISA things, can the task allocate the additional cpumask and retain the full mask. > (although I doubt I'll get something out before the new > year at this point). Yeah, we're all about to shut down for a bit, I'll not be looking at email for 2 weeks either, so even if you send it, I might not see it until the next year.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kernel-team@android.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:55:33 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201217105533.GV3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201215185012.GA15566@willie-the-truck> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:50:12PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > IOW, any (accidental or otherwise) trip through a 32bit helper, will > > destroy user state (the affinity mask: 0x3c). > > Yes, that's correct, and I agree that it's a rough edge. If you're happy > with the idea of adding an extra mask to make this work, then I can start > hacking that up Yeah, I'm afraid we'll have to, this asymmetric muck is only going to get worse from here on. Anyway, I think we can avoid adding another cpumask_t to task_struct and do with a cpumask_t * insteads. After all, for 'normal' tasks, the task_cpu_possible_mask() will be cpu_possible_mask and we don't need to carry anything extra. Only once we hit one of these assymetric ISA things, can the task allocate the additional cpumask and retain the full mask. > (although I doubt I'll get something out before the new > year at this point). Yeah, we're all about to shut down for a bit, I'll not be looking at email for 2 weeks either, so even if you send it, I might not see it until the next year. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-17 10:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-08 13:28 [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-17 12:15 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-17 12:15 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-17 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-12-17 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-12-17 14:59 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-17 14:59 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-17 15:00 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-17 15:00 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-28 3:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan 2020-12-28 3:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] sched: Introduce force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit CPU affinity Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-28 4:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan 2020-12-28 4:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-15 17:36 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Peter Zijlstra 2020-12-15 17:36 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-12-15 18:50 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-15 18:50 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-17 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2020-12-17 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2020-12-16 11:16 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-16 11:16 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-16 14:14 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-16 14:14 ` Will Deacon 2020-12-16 16:48 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-16 16:48 ` Qais Yousef 2020-12-16 18:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan 2020-12-16 18:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201217105533.GV3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.