All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
To: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	jxgao@google.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dma: mark unmapped DMA scatter/gather invalid
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111154335.23388-1-marcorr@google.com> (raw)

This patch updates dma_direct_unmap_sg() to mark each scatter/gather
entry invalid, after it's unmapped. This fixes two issues:

1. It makes the unmapping code able to tolerate a double unmap.
2. It prevents the NVMe driver from erroneously treating an unmapped DMA
address as mapped.

The bug that motivated this patch was the following sequence, which
occurred within the NVMe driver, with the kernel flag `swiotlb=force`.

* NVMe driver calls dma_direct_map_sg()
* dma_direct_map_sg() fails part way through the scatter gather/list
* dma_direct_map_sg() calls dma_direct_unmap_sg() to unmap any entries
  succeeded.
* NVMe driver calls dma_direct_unmap_sg(), redundantly, leading to a
  double unmap, which is a bug.

With this patch, a hadoop workload running on a cluster of three AMD
SEV VMs, is able to succeed. Without the patch, the hadoop workload
suffers application-level and even VM-level failures.

Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
Tested-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
---
 kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 0a4881e59aa7..3d9b17fe5771 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -374,9 +374,11 @@ void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i)
+	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
 		dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, sg->dma_address, sg_dma_len(sg), dir,
 			     attrs);
+		sg->dma_address = DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_direct_unmap_sg);
 #endif
-- 
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Orr via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	 jxgao@google.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dma: mark unmapped DMA scatter/gather invalid
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111154335.23388-1-marcorr@google.com> (raw)

This patch updates dma_direct_unmap_sg() to mark each scatter/gather
entry invalid, after it's unmapped. This fixes two issues:

1. It makes the unmapping code able to tolerate a double unmap.
2. It prevents the NVMe driver from erroneously treating an unmapped DMA
address as mapped.

The bug that motivated this patch was the following sequence, which
occurred within the NVMe driver, with the kernel flag `swiotlb=force`.

* NVMe driver calls dma_direct_map_sg()
* dma_direct_map_sg() fails part way through the scatter gather/list
* dma_direct_map_sg() calls dma_direct_unmap_sg() to unmap any entries
  succeeded.
* NVMe driver calls dma_direct_unmap_sg(), redundantly, leading to a
  double unmap, which is a bug.

With this patch, a hadoop workload running on a cluster of three AMD
SEV VMs, is able to succeed. Without the patch, the hadoop workload
suffers application-level and even VM-level failures.

Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
Tested-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
---
 kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 0a4881e59aa7..3d9b17fe5771 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -374,9 +374,11 @@ void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	int i;
 
-	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i)
+	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
 		dma_direct_unmap_page(dev, sg->dma_address, sg_dma_len(sg), dir,
 			     attrs);
+		sg->dma_address = DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_direct_unmap_sg);
 #endif
-- 
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 15:43 Marc Orr [this message]
2021-01-11 15:43 ` [PATCH] dma: mark unmapped DMA scatter/gather invalid Marc Orr via iommu
2021-01-11 16:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 16:08   ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 18:03   ` Marc Orr
2021-01-11 18:03     ` Marc Orr via iommu
2021-01-11 20:39     ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 20:39       ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-11 21:36       ` Marc Orr
2021-01-11 21:36         ` Marc Orr via iommu
2021-01-11 16:15 ` Greg KH
2021-01-11 16:15   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210111154335.23388-1-marcorr@google.com \
    --to=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.