All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

Changlog since v1
o Move extern declaration to header for coding style
o Remove unnecessary parameter from __select_idle_cpu

This series of 5 patches reposts three patches from Peter entitled
"select_idle_sibling() wreckage". It only scans the runqueues in a single
pass when searching for an idle sibling.

Two patches from Peter were dropped. The first patch altered how scan
depth was calculated. Scan depth deletion is a random number generator
with two major limitations. The avg_idle time is based on the time
between a CPU going idle and being woken up clamped approximately by
2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost.  This is difficult to compare in a sensible
fashion to avg_scan_cost. The second issue is that only the avg_scan_cost
of scan failures is recorded and it does not decay.  This requires deeper
surgery that would justify a patch on its own although Peter notes that
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180530143105.977759909@infradead.org is
potentially useful for an alternative avg_idle metric.

The second patch dropped converted the idle core scan throttling
mechanism to SIS_PROP. While this would unify the throttling of core
and CPU scanning, it was not free of regressions and has_idle_cores is
a fairly effective throttling mechanism with the caveat that it can have
a lot of false positives for workloads like hackbench.

Peter's series tried to solve three problems at once, this subset addresses
one problem. As with anything select_idle_sibling, it's a mix of wins and
losses but won more than it lost across a range of workloads and machines.

 kernel/sched/core.c     |  18 +++--
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 kernel/sched/features.h |   1 -
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |   2 +
 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU
  2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

SIS_AVG_CPU was introduced as a means of avoiding a search when the
average search cost indicated that the search would likely fail. It was
a blunt instrument and disabled by commit 4c77b18cf8b7 ("sched/fair: Make
select_idle_cpu() more aggressive") and later replaced with a proportional
search depth by commit 1ad3aaf3fcd2 ("sched/core: Implement new approach
to scale select_idle_cpu()").

While there are corner cases where SIS_AVG_CPU is better, it has now been
disabled for almost three years. As the intent of SIS_PROP is to reduce
the time complexity of select_idle_cpu(), lets drop SIS_AVG_CPU and focus
on SIS_PROP as a throttling mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 20 +++++++++-----------
 kernel/sched/features.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 04a3ce20da67..9f5682aeda2e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6145,7 +6145,6 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 {
 	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
 	struct sched_domain *this_sd;
-	u64 avg_cost, avg_idle;
 	u64 time;
 	int this = smp_processor_id();
 	int cpu, nr = INT_MAX;
@@ -6154,18 +6153,17 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 	if (!this_sd)
 		return -1;
 
-	/*
-	 * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor; hackbench in
-	 * particularly is sensitive here.
-	 */
-	avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle / 512;
-	avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
+		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
 
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_AVG_CPU) && avg_idle < avg_cost)
-		return -1;
+		/*
+		 * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor;
+		 * hackbench in particularly is sensitive here.
+		 */
+		avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle / 512;
+		avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
 
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
-		u64 span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
+		span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
 		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
 			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
 		else
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 68d369cba9e4..e875eabb6600 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
 /*
  * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain.
  */
-SCHED_FEAT(SIS_AVG_CPU, false)
 SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, true)
 
 /*
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP
  2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

As noted by Vincent Guittot, avg_scan_costs are calculated for SIS_PROP
even if SIS_PROP is disabled. Move the time calculations under a SIS_PROP
check and while we are at it, exclude the cost of initialising the CPU
mask from the average scan cost.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9f5682aeda2e..c8d8e185cf3b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6153,6 +6153,8 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 	if (!this_sd)
 		return -1;
 
+	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
+
 	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
 		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
 
@@ -6168,11 +6170,9 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
 		else
 			nr = 4;
-	}
-
-	time = cpu_clock(this);
 
-	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
+		time = cpu_clock(this);
+	}
 
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
 		if (!--nr)
@@ -6181,8 +6181,10 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 			break;
 	}
 
-	time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
-	update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
+		time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
+		update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
+	}
 
 	return cpu;
 }
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores
  2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
  2021-01-18  8:14   ` Li, Aubrey
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Instead of calculating how many (logical) CPUs to scan, compute how
many cores to scan.

This changes behaviour for anything !SMT2.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 12 ++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 15d2562118d1..ada8faac2e4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7444,11 +7444,19 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
 	balance_push_set(cpu, false);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-	/*
-	 * When going up, increment the number of cores with SMT present.
-	 */
-	if (cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)) == 2)
-		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_smt_present);
+	do {
+		int weight = cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
+
+		if (weight > sched_smt_weight)
+			sched_smt_weight = weight;
+
+		/*
+		 * When going up, increment the number of cores with SMT present.
+		 */
+		if (weight == 2)
+			static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_smt_present);
+
+	} while (0);
 #endif
 	set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c8d8e185cf3b..0811e2fe4f19 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6010,6 +6010,8 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
 
+int sched_smt_weight __read_mostly = 1;
+
 static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
 {
 	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
@@ -6124,6 +6126,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 
 #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
 
+#define sched_smt_weight	1
+
 static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	return -1;
@@ -6136,6 +6140,8 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
 
+#define sis_min_cores		2
+
 /*
  * Scan the LLC domain for idle CPUs; this is dynamically regulated by
  * comparing the average scan cost (tracked in sd->avg_scan_cost) against the
@@ -6166,10 +6172,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 		avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
 
 		span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
-		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
+		if (span_avg > sis_min_cores*avg_cost)
 			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
 		else
-			nr = 4;
+			nr = sis_min_cores;
+
+		nr *= sched_smt_weight;
 
 		time = cpu_clock(this);
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 12ada79d40f3..29aabe98dd1d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1107,6 +1107,8 @@ static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
 		__update_idle_core(rq);
 }
 
+extern int sched_smt_weight;
+
 #else
 static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
 #endif
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt()
  2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

In order to make the next patch more readable, and to quantify the
actual effectiveness of this pass, start by removing it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 ------------------------------
 1 file changed, 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0811e2fe4f19..12e08da90024 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6103,27 +6103,6 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
 	return -1;
 }
 
-/*
- * Scan the local SMT mask for idle CPUs.
- */
-static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
-{
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
-		return -1;
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(target)) {
-		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) ||
-		    !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
-			continue;
-		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
-			return cpu;
-	}
-
-	return -1;
-}
-
 #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
 
 #define sched_smt_weight	1
@@ -6133,11 +6112,6 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *s
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
-{
-	return -1;
-}
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
 
 #define sis_min_cores		2
@@ -6331,10 +6305,6 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
-	i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, target);
-	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
-		return i;
-
 	return target;
 }
 
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
  2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
  2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-15 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Li Aubrey, Qais Yousef, LKML, Mel Gorman

From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Both select_idle_core() and select_idle_cpu() do a loop over the same
cpumask. Observe that by clearing the already visited CPUs, we can
fold the iteration and iterate a core at a time.

All we need to do is remember any non-idle CPU we encountered while
scanning for an idle core. This way we'll only iterate every CPU once.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 12e08da90024..6c0f841e9e75 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6006,6 +6006,14 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
 	return new_cpu;
 }
 
+static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+	if (available_idle_cpu(core) || sched_idle_cpu(core))
+		return core;
+
+	return -1;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
@@ -6066,40 +6074,34 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
  * there are no idle cores left in the system; tracked through
  * sd_llc->shared->has_idle_cores and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
  */
-static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
+static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
 {
-	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
-	int core, cpu;
+	bool idle = true;
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
-		return -1;
-
-	if (!test_idle_cores(target, false))
-		return -1;
-
-	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
+		return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
 
-	for_each_cpu_wrap(core, cpus, target) {
-		bool idle = true;
-
-		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
-			if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
-				idle = false;
-				break;
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
+		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
+			idle = false;
+			if (*idle_cpu == -1) {
+				if (sched_idle_cpu(cpu) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) {
+					*idle_cpu = cpu;
+					break;
+				}
+				continue;
 			}
+			break;
 		}
-
-		if (idle)
-			return core;
-
-		cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
+		if (*idle_cpu == -1 && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+			*idle_cpu = cpu;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Failed to find an idle core; stop looking for one.
-	 */
-	set_idle_cores(target, 0);
+	if (idle)
+		return core;
 
+	cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
 	return -1;
 }
 
@@ -6107,9 +6109,18 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
 
 #define sched_smt_weight	1
 
-static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
+static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
 {
-	return -1;
+}
+
+static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
+{
+	return def;
+}
+
+static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
+{
+	return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
@@ -6124,10 +6135,11 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *s
 static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
+	int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
+	bool smt = test_idle_cores(target, false);
+	int this = smp_processor_id();
 	struct sched_domain *this_sd;
 	u64 time;
-	int this = smp_processor_id();
-	int cpu, nr = INT_MAX;
 
 	this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
 	if (!this_sd)
@@ -6135,7 +6147,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 
 	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
 
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
 		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
 
 		/*
@@ -6159,16 +6171,29 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
 		if (!--nr)
 			return -1;
-		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
-			break;
+		if (smt) {
+			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
+				return i;
+
+		} else {
+			i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus);
+			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
+				idle_cpu = i;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
+	if (smt)
+		set_idle_cores(this, false);
+
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
 		time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
 		update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
 	}
 
-	return cpu;
+	return idle_cpu;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -6297,10 +6322,6 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	if (!sd)
 		return target;
 
-	i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target);
-	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
-		return i;
-
 	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, target);
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-18  8:14   ` Li, Aubrey
  2021-01-18  9:27     ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Li, Aubrey @ 2021-01-18  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Qais Yousef, LKML

On 2021/1/15 18:08, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Instead of calculating how many (logical) CPUs to scan, compute how
> many cores to scan.
> 
> This changes behaviour for anything !SMT2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c  | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  kernel/sched/fair.c  | 12 ++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/sched.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 15d2562118d1..ada8faac2e4d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7444,11 +7444,19 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
>  	balance_push_set(cpu, false);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> -	/*
> -	 * When going up, increment the number of cores with SMT present.
> -	 */
> -	if (cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)) == 2)
> -		static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_smt_present);
> +	do {
> +		int weight = cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
> +
> +		if (weight > sched_smt_weight)
> +			sched_smt_weight = weight;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * When going up, increment the number of cores with SMT present.
> +		 */
> +		if (weight == 2)
> +			static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_smt_present);
> +
> +	} while (0);
>  #endif
>  	set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c8d8e185cf3b..0811e2fe4f19 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6010,6 +6010,8 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
>  
> +int sched_smt_weight __read_mostly = 1;
> +
>  static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
>  {
>  	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
> @@ -6124,6 +6126,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
>  
> +#define sched_smt_weight	1
> +
>  static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
>  {
>  	return -1;
> @@ -6136,6 +6140,8 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
>  
> +#define sis_min_cores		2
> +
>  /*
>   * Scan the LLC domain for idle CPUs; this is dynamically regulated by
>   * comparing the average scan cost (tracked in sd->avg_scan_cost) against the
> @@ -6166,10 +6172,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  		avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
>  
>  		span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
> -		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
> +		if (span_avg > sis_min_cores*avg_cost)
>  			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
>  		else
> -			nr = 4;
> +			nr = sis_min_cores;
> +
> +		nr *= sched_smt_weight;

Is it better to put this into an inline wrapper to hide sched_smt_weight if !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT?

Thanks,
-Aubrey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores
  2021-01-18  8:14   ` Li, Aubrey
@ 2021-01-18  9:27     ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-18  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li, Aubrey
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Vincent Guittot, Qais Yousef, LKML

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:14:36PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > @@ -6124,6 +6126,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> >  
> >  #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> >  
> > +#define sched_smt_weight	1
> > +
> >  static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> >  {
> >  	return -1;
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > @@ -6166,10 +6172,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> >  		avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
> >  
> >  		span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
> > -		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
> > +		if (span_avg > sis_min_cores*avg_cost)
> >  			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
> >  		else
> > -			nr = 4;
> > +			nr = sis_min_cores;
> > +
> > +		nr *= sched_smt_weight;
> 
> Is it better to put this into an inline wrapper to hide sched_smt_weight if !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT?
> 

There already is a #define sched_smt_weight for !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT and I
do not think an inline wrapper would make it more readable or maintainable.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
  2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
@ 2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
  2021-01-18 14:41     ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Li, Aubrey @ 2021-01-18 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mel Gorman, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Vincent Guittot, Qais Yousef, LKML

On 2021/1/15 18:08, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Both select_idle_core() and select_idle_cpu() do a loop over the same
> cpumask. Observe that by clearing the already visited CPUs, we can
> fold the iteration and iterate a core at a time.
> 
> All we need to do is remember any non-idle CPU we encountered while
> scanning for an idle core. This way we'll only iterate every CPU once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 12e08da90024..6c0f841e9e75 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6006,6 +6006,14 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
>  	return new_cpu;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus)

Sorry if I missed anything, why p and cpus are needed here?

> +{
> +	if (available_idle_cpu(core) || sched_idle_cpu(core))
> +		return core;
> +
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
> @@ -6066,40 +6074,34 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
>   * there are no idle cores left in the system; tracked through
>   * sd_llc->shared->has_idle_cores and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
>   */
> -static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> +static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
>  {
> -	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
> -	int core, cpu;
> +	bool idle = true;
> +	int cpu;
>  
>  	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	if (!test_idle_cores(target, false))
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
> +		return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
>  
> -	for_each_cpu_wrap(core, cpus, target) {
> -		bool idle = true;
> -
> -		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> -			if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> -				idle = false;
> -				break;
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> +		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> +			idle = false;
> +			if (*idle_cpu == -1) {
> +				if (sched_idle_cpu(cpu) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr)) {
> +					*idle_cpu = cpu;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +				continue;
>  			}
> +			break;
>  		}
> -
> -		if (idle)
> -			return core;
> -
> -		cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
> +		if (*idle_cpu == -1 && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
> +			*idle_cpu = cpu;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Failed to find an idle core; stop looking for one.
> -	 */
> -	set_idle_cores(target, 0);
> +	if (idle)
> +		return core;
>  
> +	cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -6107,9 +6109,18 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
>  
>  #define sched_smt_weight	1
>  
> -static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> +static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
>  {
> -	return -1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
> +{
> +	return def;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
> +{
> +	return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> @@ -6124,10 +6135,11 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *s
>  static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
>  {
>  	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
> +	int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
> +	bool smt = test_idle_cores(target, false);
> +	int this = smp_processor_id();
>  	struct sched_domain *this_sd;
>  	u64 time;
> -	int this = smp_processor_id();
> -	int cpu, nr = INT_MAX;
>  
>  	this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc));
>  	if (!this_sd)
> @@ -6135,7 +6147,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  
>  	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
>  
> -	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> +	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
Is it possible the system does have a idle core, but I still don't want to scan the entire llc domain?

>  		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -6159,16 +6171,29 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
>  		if (!--nr)
>  			return -1;

It looks like nr only makes sense when smt = false now, can it be moved into else branch below?

> -		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> -			break;
> +		if (smt) {
> +			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> +				return i;

What if the last idle core is selected here, should we set_idle_cores false before return?

> +
> +		} else {
> +			i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus);
> +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> +				idle_cpu = i;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> +	if (smt)
> +		set_idle_cores(this, false);
> +
> +	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
>  		time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
>  		update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
>  	}
>  
> -	return cpu;
> +	return idle_cpu;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -6297,10 +6322,6 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	if (!sd)
>  		return target;
>  
> -	i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target);
> -	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> -		return i;
> -
>  	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, target);
>  	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
>  		return i;
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
  2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
@ 2021-01-18 14:41     ` Mel Gorman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2021-01-18 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li, Aubrey
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Vincent Guittot, Qais Yousef, LKML

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:55:03PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 12e08da90024..6c0f841e9e75 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -6006,6 +6006,14 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
> >  	return new_cpu;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus)
> 
> Sorry if I missed anything, why p and cpus are needed here?
> 

They are not needed. The original code was matching the calling pattern
for select_idle_core() which needs p and cpus to check if sibling CPUs
are allowed.

> > @@ -6135,7 +6147,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> >  
> >  	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
> >  
> > -	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> > +	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
>
> Is it possible the system does have a idle core, but I still don't want to scan the entire llc domain?
> 

This version is matching historical behaviour. To limit the scan for cores,
select_idle_core() would need to obey SIS_PROP and that patch was dropped
as it introduced regressions. It would only be considered once SIS_PROP
had better metrics for limiting the depth of the search.

> >  		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
> >  
> >  		/*
> > @@ -6159,16 +6171,29 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> >  	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> >  		if (!--nr)
> >  			return -1;
> 
> It looks like nr only makes sense when smt = false now, can it be moved into else branch below?
> 

It can. I expect the saving to be marginal and it will need to move back
when/if select_idle_core() obeys SIS_PROP.

> > -		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> > -			break;
> > +		if (smt) {
> > +			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> > +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> > +				return i;
> 
> What if the last idle core is selected here, should we set_idle_cores false before return?
> 

We'd have to check what bits were still set in the cpus mask and
determine if they represent an idle core. I severely doubt it would be
worth the cost given that the availability of idle cores can change at
any instant.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-18 14:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-18  8:14   ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18  9:27     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 14:41     ` Mel Gorman

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.