All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:46:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125114644.7b7cec67@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h

between commit:

  41a9c75d0acf ("drm/i915/gem: Move stolen node into GEM object union")

from the drm tree and commit:

  5fbc2c2bfa5c ("drm/i915/gem: Add a helper to read data from a GEM object page")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 5274e9d139b4,ae83737f1d48..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@@ -548,6 -546,6 +554,8 @@@ i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(
  		__i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(obj, origin);
  }
  
 +bool i915_gem_object_is_shmem(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 +
+ int i915_gem_object_read_from_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, u64 offset, void *dst, int size);
+ 
  #endif

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:46:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125114644.7b7cec67@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h

between commit:

  41a9c75d0acf ("drm/i915/gem: Move stolen node into GEM object union")

from the drm tree and commit:

  5fbc2c2bfa5c ("drm/i915/gem: Add a helper to read data from a GEM object page")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 5274e9d139b4,ae83737f1d48..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@@ -548,6 -546,6 +554,8 @@@ i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(
  		__i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(obj, origin);
  }
  
 +bool i915_gem_object_is_shmem(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 +
+ int i915_gem_object_read_from_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, u64 offset, void *dst, int size);
+ 
  #endif

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:46:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125114644.7b7cec67@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h

between commit:

  41a9c75d0acf ("drm/i915/gem: Move stolen node into GEM object union")

from the drm tree and commit:

  5fbc2c2bfa5c ("drm/i915/gem: Add a helper to read data from a GEM object page")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 5274e9d139b4,ae83737f1d48..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@@ -548,6 -546,6 +554,8 @@@ i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(
  		__i915_gem_object_invalidate_frontbuffer(obj, origin);
  }
  
 +bool i915_gem_object_is_shmem(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 +
+ int i915_gem_object_read_from_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, u64 offset, void *dst, int size);
+ 
  #endif

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25  0:46 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-01-25  0:46 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-25  0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-03  0:09 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03  0:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-05 14:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-30  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  1:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  1:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  2:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  2:10   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-24 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-24 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-13  2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-13  2:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-12  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-12  1:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-11  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-11  2:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-09  0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-09  0:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-12  1:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-01  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-01  2:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17  3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17  3:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18  1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18  1:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-29 22:23   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-29 22:23     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-14  1:53     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-14  1:53       ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-14 12:14       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-07-14  2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-14  2:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-22  3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-06  0:42 Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-17  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-17  1:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-19  2:04 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-07  3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  3:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  5:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23  5:09   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-03  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-03  1:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22  3:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22 10:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-23  1:21   ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-23  1:21     ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-23 21:10     ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-23 21:10       ` Olof Johansson
2013-11-07  2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-07  2:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-29  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-29  4:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-18  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-18  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-01  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-01  8:08 ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210125114644.7b7cec67@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.