All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	Alex Xu <alex@alxu.ca>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2] virtiofsd: prevent opening of special files (CVE-2020-35517)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:20:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127112023.0e97f909@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOssrKdh3kqKN4uGE=s5eiymd2MXKsRXUegqRH-TFhqYOK7WOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:25:28 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:18 PM Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:35:02 +0000
> > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The patch looks pretty good to me. It just seems to be missing a change in
> > lo_create():
> >
> >     fd = openat(parent_inode->fd, name, (fi->flags | O_CREAT) & ~O_NOFOLLOW,
> >                 mode);
> >
> > A malicious guest could have created anything called ${name} in this directory
> > before calling FUSE_CREATE and we'll open it blindly, or I'm missing something ?
> 
> Right, this seems like an omission.
> 
> Also the "& ~O_NOFOLLOW" looks like a copy-paste bug, since unlike
> lo_open(), lo_create() is not opening a proc symlink.
> 
> So that should be replaced with "| O_NOFOLLOW"
> 


Yes, I've realized that later on. We should definitely enforce O_NOFOLLOW
to avoid symlink escapes.

Then comes the case of special files... A well-known case is the FIFO that
causes openat() to block as described in my response. FWIW, we addressed
this one in 9P by adding O_NONBLOCK and fixing the flags to the client
expectation with fcntl(F_SETFL). But this is just a protection against
being blocked. Blindly opening a special file can lead to any kind of
troubles you can think of... so it really looks that the only sane way
to be safe from such an attack is to forbid openat() of special files at
the filesystem level.

> Thanks,
> Miklos
> 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
	Alex Xu <alex@alxu.ca>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v2] virtiofsd: prevent opening of special files (CVE-2020-35517)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:20:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127112023.0e97f909@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOssrKdh3kqKN4uGE=s5eiymd2MXKsRXUegqRH-TFhqYOK7WOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:25:28 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:18 PM Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:35:02 +0000
> > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The patch looks pretty good to me. It just seems to be missing a change in
> > lo_create():
> >
> >     fd = openat(parent_inode->fd, name, (fi->flags | O_CREAT) & ~O_NOFOLLOW,
> >                 mode);
> >
> > A malicious guest could have created anything called ${name} in this directory
> > before calling FUSE_CREATE and we'll open it blindly, or I'm missing something ?
> 
> Right, this seems like an omission.
> 
> Also the "& ~O_NOFOLLOW" looks like a copy-paste bug, since unlike
> lo_open(), lo_create() is not opening a proc symlink.
> 
> So that should be replaced with "| O_NOFOLLOW"
> 


Yes, I've realized that later on. We should definitely enforce O_NOFOLLOW
to avoid symlink escapes.

Then comes the case of special files... A well-known case is the FIFO that
causes openat() to block as described in my response. FWIW, we addressed
this one in 9P by adding O_NONBLOCK and fixing the flags to the client
expectation with fcntl(F_SETFL). But this is just a protection against
being blocked. Blindly opening a special file can lead to any kind of
troubles you can think of... so it really looks that the only sane way
to be safe from such an attack is to forbid openat() of special files at
the filesystem level.

> Thanks,
> Miklos
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-26 10:35 [PATCH v2] virtiofsd: prevent opening of special files (CVE-2020-35517) Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-01-26 10:35 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-01-26 10:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-26 10:36   ` [Virtio-fs] " Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-26 10:47 ` Liam Merwick
2021-01-26 17:16 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27  9:25   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27  9:25     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 10:20     ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-01-27 10:20       ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 10:34       ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 10:34         ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 13:49         ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 13:49           ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 14:09           ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 14:09             ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:09             ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 15:09               ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 15:22               ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:22                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:35                 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 15:35                   ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 15:47                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:47                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:52                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-27 15:52                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 12:14                       ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-28 12:14                         ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-28 14:00                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 14:00                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-01-28 14:26                           ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-28 14:26                             ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-27 10:18   ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210127112023.0e97f909@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=alex@alxu.ca \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.