All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: rework NEON yielding to avoid scheduling from asm code
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:03:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204130311.GD20468@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204111026.GA8155@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:10:26PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > Half of the patches in this series conflict with
> > 
> > 0df07d8117c3 crypto: arm64/sha - add missing module aliases
> > 
> > in the cryptodev tree, so that won't work.
> 
> Fair enough.  I'll take the patches.

Cheers, Herbert. Please just leave the final patch ("arm64: assembler:
remove conditional NEON yield macro"), as we can come back to that for
5.13.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: rework NEON yielding to avoid scheduling from asm code
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:03:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204130311.GD20468@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204111026.GA8155@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:10:26PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > Half of the patches in this series conflict with
> > 
> > 0df07d8117c3 crypto: arm64/sha - add missing module aliases
> > 
> > in the cryptodev tree, so that won't work.
> 
> Fair enough.  I'll take the patches.

Cheers, Herbert. Please just leave the final patch ("arm64: assembler:
remove conditional NEON yield macro"), as we can come back to that for
5.13.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-03 11:36 [PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: rework NEON yielding to avoid scheduling from asm code Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: assembler: add cond_yield macro Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] crypto: arm64/sha1-ce - simplify NEON yield Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] crypto: arm64/sha2-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] crypto: arm64/sha3-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] crypto: arm64/sha512-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] crypto: arm64/aes-neonbs - remove NEON yield calls Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] crypto: arm64/aes-ce-mac - simplify NEON yield Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] crypto: arm64/crc-t10dif - move NEON yield to C code Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] arm64: assembler: remove conditional NEON yield macros Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 11:36   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-03 21:31 ` (subset) Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: rework NEON yielding to avoid scheduling from asm code Will Deacon
2021-02-03 21:31   ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04  2:44   ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04  2:44     ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04  8:29     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-04  8:29       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-02-04 11:10       ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04 11:10         ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04 13:03         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-02-04 13:03           ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04 19:45           ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04 19:45             ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-04 10:33   ` Will Deacon
2021-02-04 10:33     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-10  7:23 ` Herbert Xu
2021-02-10  7:23   ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210204130311.GD20468@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.