All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Doug Ledford" <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Edward Srouji" <edwards@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
	Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 3/3] configure: Add check for the presence of DRM headers
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:12:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204211210.GQ4247@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1612464651-54073-4-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:50:51AM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> Compilation of pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c depends on a few DRM headers
> that are installed by either the kernel-header or the libdrm package.
> The installation is optional and the location is not unique.
> 
> The standard locations (such as /usr/include/drm, /usr/include/libdrm)
> are checked first. If failed, pkg-config is tried to find the include
> path of custom libdrm installation. The dmabuf allocation routines now
> return suitable error when the headers are not available. The related
> tests will recognize this error code and skip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
>  CMakeLists.txt         |  7 +++++++
>  buildlib/Finddrm.cmake | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  buildlib/config.h.in   |  2 ++
>  pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> 
> diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
> index 4113423..feaba3a 100644
> +++ b/CMakeLists.txt
> @@ -515,6 +515,13 @@ find_package(Systemd)
>  include_directories(${SYSTEMD_INCLUDE_DIRS})
>  RDMA_DoFixup("${SYSTEMD_FOUND}" "systemd/sd-daemon.h")
>  
> +# drm headers
> +find_package(drm)
> +if (DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS)
> +  include_directories(${DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS})
> +  set(HAVE_DRM_H 1)
> +endif()
> +
>  #-------------------------
>  # Apply fixups
>  
> diff --git a/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake b/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6f8e5f2
> +++ b/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +# COPYRIGHT (c) 2021 Intel Corporation.
> +# Licensed under BSD (MIT variant) or GPLv2. See COPYING.
> +
> +# Check standard locations first
> +find_path(DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS "drm.h" PATH_SUFFIXES "drm" "libdrm")
> +
> +# Check custom libdrm installation, if any
> +if (NOT DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS)
> +  execute_process(COMMAND pkg-config --cflags-only-I libdrm
> +    OUTPUT_VARIABLE _LIBDRM
> +    RESULT_VARIABLE _LIBDRM_RESULT
> +    ERROR_QUIET)
> +
> +  if (NOT _LIBDRM_RESULT)
> +    string(REGEX REPLACE "^-I" "" DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS "${_LIBDRM}")
> +  endif()
> +  unset(_LIBDRM)
> +  unset(_LIBDRM_RESULT)
> +endif()

I think this should be using pkg_check_modules() ??

Look at the NL stuff:

  pkg_check_modules(NL libnl-3.0 libnl-route-3.0 REQUIRED)
  include_directories(${NL_INCLUDE_DIRS})
  link_directories(${NL_LIBRARY_DIRS})

> +#if HAVE_DRM_H
> +

Would rather you use cmake to conditionally compile a dmabuf_alloc.c
or a dmabuf_alloc_stub.c than ifdef the entire file

Jaason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
	Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core 3/3] configure: Add check for the presence of DRM headers
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:12:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204211210.GQ4247@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1612464651-54073-4-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:50:51AM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> Compilation of pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c depends on a few DRM headers
> that are installed by either the kernel-header or the libdrm package.
> The installation is optional and the location is not unique.
> 
> The standard locations (such as /usr/include/drm, /usr/include/libdrm)
> are checked first. If failed, pkg-config is tried to find the include
> path of custom libdrm installation. The dmabuf allocation routines now
> return suitable error when the headers are not available. The related
> tests will recognize this error code and skip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
>  CMakeLists.txt         |  7 +++++++
>  buildlib/Finddrm.cmake | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  buildlib/config.h.in   |  2 ++
>  pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> 
> diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
> index 4113423..feaba3a 100644
> +++ b/CMakeLists.txt
> @@ -515,6 +515,13 @@ find_package(Systemd)
>  include_directories(${SYSTEMD_INCLUDE_DIRS})
>  RDMA_DoFixup("${SYSTEMD_FOUND}" "systemd/sd-daemon.h")
>  
> +# drm headers
> +find_package(drm)
> +if (DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS)
> +  include_directories(${DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS})
> +  set(HAVE_DRM_H 1)
> +endif()
> +
>  #-------------------------
>  # Apply fixups
>  
> diff --git a/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake b/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6f8e5f2
> +++ b/buildlib/Finddrm.cmake
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +# COPYRIGHT (c) 2021 Intel Corporation.
> +# Licensed under BSD (MIT variant) or GPLv2. See COPYING.
> +
> +# Check standard locations first
> +find_path(DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS "drm.h" PATH_SUFFIXES "drm" "libdrm")
> +
> +# Check custom libdrm installation, if any
> +if (NOT DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS)
> +  execute_process(COMMAND pkg-config --cflags-only-I libdrm
> +    OUTPUT_VARIABLE _LIBDRM
> +    RESULT_VARIABLE _LIBDRM_RESULT
> +    ERROR_QUIET)
> +
> +  if (NOT _LIBDRM_RESULT)
> +    string(REGEX REPLACE "^-I" "" DRM_INCLUDE_DIRS "${_LIBDRM}")
> +  endif()
> +  unset(_LIBDRM)
> +  unset(_LIBDRM_RESULT)
> +endif()

I think this should be using pkg_check_modules() ??

Look at the NL stuff:

  pkg_check_modules(NL libnl-3.0 libnl-route-3.0 REQUIRED)
  include_directories(${NL_INCLUDE_DIRS})
  link_directories(${NL_LIBRARY_DIRS})

> +#if HAVE_DRM_H
> +

Would rather you use cmake to conditionally compile a dmabuf_alloc.c
or a dmabuf_alloc_stub.c than ifdef the entire file

Jaason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04 18:50 [PATCH rdma-core 0/3] Dma-buf related fixes Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50 ` Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50 ` [PATCH rdma-core 1/3] verbs: Fix gcc warnings when building for 32bit systems Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50   ` Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50 ` [PATCH rdma-core 2/3] pyverbs,tests: Cosmetic improvements for dma-buf allocation routines Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50   ` [PATCH rdma-core 2/3] pyverbs, tests: " Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 23:04   ` [PATCH rdma-core 2/3] pyverbs,tests: " John Hubbard
2021-02-04 23:04     ` John Hubbard
2021-02-04 18:50 ` [PATCH rdma-core 3/3] configure: Add check for the presence of DRM headers Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 18:50   ` Jianxin Xiong
2021-02-04 21:12   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-02-04 21:12     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-04 22:11     ` Xiong, Jianxin
2021-02-04 22:11       ` Xiong, Jianxin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210204211210.GQ4247@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=galpress@amazon.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jianxin.xiong@intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.