From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held() Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:44:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210215104402.GC4507@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YCljfeNr4m5mZa4N@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 06:53:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 04:28:42PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { \ > > + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l)); \ > > + } while (0) > > + > > This thing isn't as straight forward as you might think, but it'll > mostly work. > > Notably this thing will misfire when lockdep_off() is employed. It > certainyl needs a comment to explain the subtleties. I think something like so will work, but please double check. diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index b9e9adec73e8..c8b0d292bf8e 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h @@ -294,11 +294,15 @@ extern void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie); #define lockdep_depth(tsk) (debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0) -#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \ - WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l)); \ +#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \ + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 0)); \ } while (0) -#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { \ +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { \ + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 1)); \ + } while (0) + +#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { \ WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held_type(l, 0)); \ } while (0) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index c1418b47f625..983ba206f7b2 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ noinstr int lock_is_held_type(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read) int ret = 0; if (unlikely(!lockdep_enabled())) - return 1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */ + return -1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */ raw_local_irq_save(flags); check_flags(flags);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kvalo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held() Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:44:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210215104402.GC4507@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YCljfeNr4m5mZa4N@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 06:53:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 04:28:42PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { \ > > + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l)); \ > > + } while (0) > > + > > This thing isn't as straight forward as you might think, but it'll > mostly work. > > Notably this thing will misfire when lockdep_off() is employed. It > certainyl needs a comment to explain the subtleties. I think something like so will work, but please double check. diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index b9e9adec73e8..c8b0d292bf8e 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h @@ -294,11 +294,15 @@ extern void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie); #define lockdep_depth(tsk) (debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0) -#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \ - WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l)); \ +#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \ + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 0)); \ } while (0) -#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { \ +#define lockdep_assert_not_held(l) do { \ + WARN_ON(debug_locks && lockdep_is_held(l) == 1)); \ + } while (0) + +#define lockdep_assert_held_write(l) do { \ WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held_type(l, 0)); \ } while (0) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index c1418b47f625..983ba206f7b2 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -5467,7 +5467,7 @@ noinstr int lock_is_held_type(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read) int ret = 0; if (unlikely(!lockdep_enabled())) - return 1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */ + return -1; /* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_held() */ raw_local_irq_save(flags); check_flags(flags); _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 10:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-12 23:28 [PATCH 0/2] Add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan 2021-02-12 23:28 ` Shuah Khan 2021-02-12 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held() Shuah Khan 2021-02-12 23:28 ` Shuah Khan 2021-02-14 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-02-14 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-02-15 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-02-15 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-02-15 13:12 ` Johannes Berg 2021-02-15 13:12 ` Johannes Berg 2021-02-15 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-02-15 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-02-15 16:10 ` Johannes Berg 2021-02-15 16:10 ` Johannes Berg 2021-02-22 20:51 ` Shuah Khan 2021-02-22 20:51 ` Shuah Khan 2021-02-12 23:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls Shuah Khan 2021-02-12 23:28 ` Shuah Khan 2021-02-14 6:08 ` Kalle Valo 2021-02-14 6:08 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210215104402.GC4507@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.