All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:47:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210216124757.4eb664e9.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216110056.1228582-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:00:56 +0100
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:

> According to the virtio specification, a memory barrier should be
> used before incrementing the idx field in the "available" ring.
> So far, we did not do this in the s390-ccw bios yet, but recently
> Peter Maydell saw problems with the s390-ccw bios when running
> the qtests on an aarch64 host (the bios panic'ed with the message:
> "SCSI cannot report LUNs: response VS RESP=09"), which could
> maybe be related to the missing memory barriers. Thus let's add
> those barriers now. Since we've only seen the problem on TCG so far,
> a "bcr 14,0" should be sufficient here to trigger the tcg_gen_mb()
> in the TCG translate code.
> 
> (Note: The virtio spec also talks about using a memory barrier
> *after* incrementing the idx field, but if I understood correctly
> this is only required when using notification suppression - which
> we don't use in the s390-ccw bios here)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c | 1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c     | 1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h     | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> index 2fcb0a58c5..25598a7a97 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int recv(int fd, void *buf, int maxlen, int flags)
>  
>      /* Mark buffer as available to the host again */
>      rxvq->avail->ring[rxvq->avail->idx % rxvq->num] = id;
> +    virtio_mb();
>      rxvq->avail->idx = rxvq->avail->idx + 1;
>      vring_notify(rxvq);
>  
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> index ab49840db8..fb9687f9b3 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ void vring_send_buf(VRing *vr, void *p, int len, int flags)
>  
>      /* Chains only have a single ID */
>      if (!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT)) {
> +        virtio_mb();

I think you need to also need barriers for changes to the buffers, as
the spec talks about "manipulating the descriptor table".

>          vr->avail->idx++;
>      }
>  }
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> index 19fceb6495..6ac65482a9 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ struct VirtioCmd {
>  };
>  typedef struct VirtioCmd VirtioCmd;
>  
> +#define virtio_mb()  asm volatile("bcr 14,0" : : : "memory")

The bios is built for z900, so you probably need a bcr15 here?

> +
>  bool vring_notify(VRing *vr);
>  int drain_irqs(SubChannelId schid);
>  void vring_send_buf(VRing *vr, void *p, int len, int flags);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-16 11:00 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:43 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 11:47   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-02-16 14:21   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:30     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:32       ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:35         ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:37           ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:49             ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:40 ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-16 15:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 16:15   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 16:44     ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 17:11     ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-17  4:31     ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-17 11:15       ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-17 15:11         ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210216124757.4eb664e9.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.