[PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

Hi!

I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.

Changes v2->v3
* rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
* move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
* drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
  it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
* moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
* further API and style related cleanup

Could you please check this patchset?

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20210222023421.12576-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/

Tushar Sugandhi (2):
  IMA: Generalize key measurement tests
  IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 ++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++-------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

-- 
2.30.1

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

Hi!

I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.

Changes v2->v3
* rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
* move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
* drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
  it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
* moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
* further API and style related cleanup

Could you please check this patchset?

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20210222023421.12576-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/

Tushar Sugandhi (2):
  IMA: Generalize key measurement tests
  IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 ++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++-------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

-- 
2.30.1

[dm-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

Hi!

I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.

Changes v2->v3
* rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
* move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
* drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
  it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
* moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
* further API and style related cleanup

Could you please check this patchset?

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20210222023421.12576-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/

Tushar Sugandhi (2):
  IMA: Generalize key measurement tests
  IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 ++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++-------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

-- 
2.30.1


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[PATCH v3 1/2] IMA: Generalize key measurement tests

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

Refactor check_keys_policy() and test1() implemented in ima_keys.sh to
make it generic, and move the functionality to ima_setup.sh,
to be used for measurements in other tests in the future.

Suggested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement(),
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++---------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
index c9eef4b68..1aeb1cd89 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #
 # Verify that keys are measured correctly based on policy.
 
-TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep sed xxd"
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep tail xxd"
 TST_CNT=2
 TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
 TST_SETUP=setup
@@ -28,64 +28,18 @@ cleanup()
 	tst_is_num $KEYRING_ID && keyctl clear $KEYRING_ID
 }
 
-check_keys_policy()
-{
-	local pattern="$1"
-
-	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $FUNC_KEYCHECK, $TEMPLATE_BUF"
-		return 1
-	fi
-	return 0
-}
-
 # Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/13/564.
 # (450d0fd51564 - "IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys")
 test1()
 {
 	local keycheck_lines i keyrings templates
 	local pattern='keyrings=[^[:space:]]+'
-	local test_file="file.txt" tmp_file="file2.txt"
+	local temp_file="test1.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify key measurement for keyrings and templates specified in IMA policy"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" > $tmp_file || return
-	keycheck_lines=$(cat $tmp_file)
-	keyrings=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "keyrings" | \
-		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-	if [ -z "$keyrings" ]; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy has a keyring key-value specifier, but no specified keyrings"
-		return
-	fi
-
-	templates=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
-		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-
-	tst_res TINFO "keyrings: '$keyrings'"
-	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
-
-	grep -E "($templates).*($keyrings)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | while read line
-	do
-		local digest expected_digest algorithm
-
-		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
-		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
-		keyring=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
-
-		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
-
-		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
-			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
-			return
-		fi
-
-		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
-			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $keyring keyring"
-			return
-		fi
-	done
-
-	tst_res TPASS "specified keyrings were measured correctly"
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF > $temp_file || return
+	test_policy_measurement keyrings $temp_file
 }
 
 # Create a new keyring, import a certificate into it, and verify
@@ -97,11 +51,11 @@ test2()
 	local cert_file="$TST_DATAROOT/x509_ima.der"
 	local keyring_name="key_import_test"
 	local pattern="keyrings=[^[:space:]]*$keyring_name"
-	local temp_file="file.txt"
+	local temp_file="test2.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify measurement of certificate imported into a keyring"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" >/dev/null || return
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF >/dev/null || return
 
 	KEYRING_ID=$(keyctl newring $keyring_name @s) || \
 		tst_brk TBROK "unable to create a new keyring"
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 59a7ffeac..605db0ff6 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ compute_digest()
 	return 1
 }
 
+check_policy_pattern()
+{
+	local pattern="$1"
+	local func="$2"
+	local template="$3"
+
+	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $func, $template"
+		return 1
+	fi
+	return 0
+}
+
 check_policy_readable()
 {
 	if [ ! -f $IMA_POLICY ]; then
@@ -269,6 +282,55 @@ get_algorithm_digest()
 	echo "$algorithm|$digest"
 }
 
+test_policy_measurement()
+{
+	local policy_option="$1"
+	local lines=$(cat $2)
+	local input_digest="$3"
+	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
+	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
+	local i sources templates
+
+	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
+
+	sources=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "$policy_option" | \
+		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+	if [ -z "$sources" ]; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy $policy_option is a key-value specifier, but no values specified"
+		return
+	fi
+
+	templates=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
+		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+
+	tst_res TINFO "policy sources: '$sources'"
+	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
+
+	grep -E "($templates).*($sources)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS > $grep_file
+
+	while read line; do
+		local algorithm digest expected_digest src_line
+
+		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
+		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
+		src_line=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
+
+		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
+
+		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
+			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
+			return
+		fi
+
+		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
+			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
+			return
+		fi
+	done < $grep_file
+
+	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
+}
+
 # loop device is needed to use only for tmpfs
 TMPDIR="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}"
 if [ "$(df -T $TMPDIR | tail -1 | awk '{print $2}')" != "tmpfs" -a -n "$TST_NEEDS_DEVICE" ]; then
-- 
2.30.1

[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] IMA: Generalize key measurement tests

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

Refactor check_keys_policy() and test1() implemented in ima_keys.sh to
make it generic, and move the functionality to ima_setup.sh,
to be used for measurements in other tests in the future.

Suggested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement(),
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++---------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
index c9eef4b68..1aeb1cd89 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #
 # Verify that keys are measured correctly based on policy.
 
-TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep sed xxd"
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep tail xxd"
 TST_CNT=2
 TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
 TST_SETUP=setup
@@ -28,64 +28,18 @@ cleanup()
 	tst_is_num $KEYRING_ID && keyctl clear $KEYRING_ID
 }
 
-check_keys_policy()
-{
-	local pattern="$1"
-
-	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $FUNC_KEYCHECK, $TEMPLATE_BUF"
-		return 1
-	fi
-	return 0
-}
-
 # Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/13/564.
 # (450d0fd51564 - "IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys")
 test1()
 {
 	local keycheck_lines i keyrings templates
 	local pattern='keyrings=[^[:space:]]+'
-	local test_file="file.txt" tmp_file="file2.txt"
+	local temp_file="test1.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify key measurement for keyrings and templates specified in IMA policy"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" > $tmp_file || return
-	keycheck_lines=$(cat $tmp_file)
-	keyrings=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "keyrings" | \
-		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-	if [ -z "$keyrings" ]; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy has a keyring key-value specifier, but no specified keyrings"
-		return
-	fi
-
-	templates=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
-		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-
-	tst_res TINFO "keyrings: '$keyrings'"
-	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
-
-	grep -E "($templates).*($keyrings)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | while read line
-	do
-		local digest expected_digest algorithm
-
-		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
-		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
-		keyring=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
-
-		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
-
-		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
-			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
-			return
-		fi
-
-		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
-			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $keyring keyring"
-			return
-		fi
-	done
-
-	tst_res TPASS "specified keyrings were measured correctly"
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF > $temp_file || return
+	test_policy_measurement keyrings $temp_file
 }
 
 # Create a new keyring, import a certificate into it, and verify
@@ -97,11 +51,11 @@ test2()
 	local cert_file="$TST_DATAROOT/x509_ima.der"
 	local keyring_name="key_import_test"
 	local pattern="keyrings=[^[:space:]]*$keyring_name"
-	local temp_file="file.txt"
+	local temp_file="test2.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify measurement of certificate imported into a keyring"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" >/dev/null || return
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF >/dev/null || return
 
 	KEYRING_ID=$(keyctl newring $keyring_name @s) || \
 		tst_brk TBROK "unable to create a new keyring"
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 59a7ffeac..605db0ff6 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ compute_digest()
 	return 1
 }
 
+check_policy_pattern()
+{
+	local pattern="$1"
+	local func="$2"
+	local template="$3"
+
+	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $func, $template"
+		return 1
+	fi
+	return 0
+}
+
 check_policy_readable()
 {
 	if [ ! -f $IMA_POLICY ]; then
@@ -269,6 +282,55 @@ get_algorithm_digest()
 	echo "$algorithm|$digest"
 }
 
+test_policy_measurement()
+{
+	local policy_option="$1"
+	local lines=$(cat $2)
+	local input_digest="$3"
+	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
+	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
+	local i sources templates
+
+	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
+
+	sources=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "$policy_option" | \
+		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+	if [ -z "$sources" ]; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy $policy_option is a key-value specifier, but no values specified"
+		return
+	fi
+
+	templates=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
+		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+
+	tst_res TINFO "policy sources: '$sources'"
+	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
+
+	grep -E "($templates).*($sources)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS > $grep_file
+
+	while read line; do
+		local algorithm digest expected_digest src_line
+
+		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
+		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
+		src_line=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
+
+		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
+
+		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
+			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
+			return
+		fi
+
+		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
+			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
+			return
+		fi
+	done < $grep_file
+
+	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
+}
+
 # loop device is needed to use only for tmpfs
 TMPDIR="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}"
 if [ "$(df -T $TMPDIR | tail -1 | awk '{print $2}')" != "tmpfs" -a -n "$TST_NEEDS_DEVICE" ]; then
-- 
2.30.1

[dm-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] IMA: Generalize key measurement tests

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

Refactor check_keys_policy() and test1() implemented in ima_keys.sh to
make it generic, and move the functionality to ima_setup.sh,
to be used for measurements in other tests in the future.

Suggested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement(),
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh  | 58 ++---------------
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
index c9eef4b68..1aeb1cd89 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_keys.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #
 # Verify that keys are measured correctly based on policy.
 
-TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep sed xxd"
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="cmp cut grep tail xxd"
 TST_CNT=2
 TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
 TST_SETUP=setup
@@ -28,64 +28,18 @@ cleanup()
 	tst_is_num $KEYRING_ID && keyctl clear $KEYRING_ID
 }
 
-check_keys_policy()
-{
-	local pattern="$1"
-
-	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $FUNC_KEYCHECK, $TEMPLATE_BUF"
-		return 1
-	fi
-	return 0
-}
-
 # Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/13/564.
 # (450d0fd51564 - "IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys")
 test1()
 {
 	local keycheck_lines i keyrings templates
 	local pattern='keyrings=[^[:space:]]+'
-	local test_file="file.txt" tmp_file="file2.txt"
+	local temp_file="test1.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify key measurement for keyrings and templates specified in IMA policy"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" > $tmp_file || return
-	keycheck_lines=$(cat $tmp_file)
-	keyrings=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "keyrings" | \
-		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-	if [ -z "$keyrings" ]; then
-		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy has a keyring key-value specifier, but no specified keyrings"
-		return
-	fi
-
-	templates=$(for i in $keycheck_lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
-		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
-
-	tst_res TINFO "keyrings: '$keyrings'"
-	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
-
-	grep -E "($templates).*($keyrings)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS | while read line
-	do
-		local digest expected_digest algorithm
-
-		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
-		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
-		keyring=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
-
-		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
-
-		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
-			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
-			return
-		fi
-
-		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
-			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $keyring keyring"
-			return
-		fi
-	done
-
-	tst_res TPASS "specified keyrings were measured correctly"
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF > $temp_file || return
+	test_policy_measurement keyrings $temp_file
 }
 
 # Create a new keyring, import a certificate into it, and verify
@@ -97,11 +51,11 @@ test2()
 	local cert_file="$TST_DATAROOT/x509_ima.der"
 	local keyring_name="key_import_test"
 	local pattern="keyrings=[^[:space:]]*$keyring_name"
-	local temp_file="file.txt"
+	local temp_file="test2.txt"
 
 	tst_res TINFO "verify measurement of certificate imported into a keyring"
 
-	check_keys_policy "$pattern" >/dev/null || return
+	check_policy_pattern "$pattern" $FUNC_KEYCHECK $TEMPLATE_BUF >/dev/null || return
 
 	KEYRING_ID=$(keyctl newring $keyring_name @s) || \
 		tst_brk TBROK "unable to create a new keyring"
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 59a7ffeac..605db0ff6 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -54,6 +54,19 @@ compute_digest()
 	return 1
 }
 
+check_policy_pattern()
+{
+	local pattern="$1"
+	local func="$2"
+	local template="$3"
+
+	if ! grep -E "$pattern" $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy must specify $pattern, $func, $template"
+		return 1
+	fi
+	return 0
+}
+
 check_policy_readable()
 {
 	if [ ! -f $IMA_POLICY ]; then
@@ -269,6 +282,55 @@ get_algorithm_digest()
 	echo "$algorithm|$digest"
 }
 
+test_policy_measurement()
+{
+	local policy_option="$1"
+	local lines=$(cat $2)
+	local input_digest="$3"
+	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
+	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
+	local i sources templates
+
+	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
+
+	sources=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "$policy_option" | \
+		sed "s/\./\\\./g" | cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+	if [ -z "$sources" ]; then
+		tst_res TCONF "IMA policy $policy_option is a key-value specifier, but no values specified"
+		return
+	fi
+
+	templates=$(for i in $lines; do echo "$i" | grep "template" | \
+		cut -d'=' -f2; done | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/|/g')
+
+	tst_res TINFO "policy sources: '$sources'"
+	tst_res TINFO "templates: '$templates'"
+
+	grep -E "($templates).*($sources)" $ASCII_MEASUREMENTS > $grep_file
+
+	while read line; do
+		local algorithm digest expected_digest src_line
+
+		digest=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f2)
+		algorithm=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f4 | cut -d':' -f1)
+		src_line=$(echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f5)
+
+		echo "$line" | cut -d' ' -f6 | xxd -r -p > $test_file
+
+		if ! expected_digest="$(compute_digest $algorithm $test_file)"; then
+			tst_res TCONF "cannot compute digest for $algorithm"
+			return
+		fi
+
+		if [ "$digest" != "$expected_digest" ]; then
+			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
+			return
+		fi
+	done < $grep_file
+
+	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
+}
+
 # loop device is needed to use only for tmpfs
 TMPDIR="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}"
 if [ "$(df -T $TMPDIR | tail -1 | awk '{print $2}')" != "tmpfs" -a -n "$TST_NEEDS_DEVICE" ]; then
-- 
2.30.1


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

New functionality is being added to IMA to measure data provided by
kernel components. With this feature, IMA policy can be set to enable
measuring data provided by device-mapper targets. Currently one such
device-mapper target - dm-crypt, is being updated to use this
functionality. This new functionality needs test automation in LTP.

Add a testcase which verifies that the IMA subsystem correctly measures
the data coming from a device-mapper target - dm-crypt.

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: adapt to previous commit changes, removed template=ima-buf,
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
I wonder if $input_digest and $input_digest_found is needed to be
considered in loop. Maybe there could be return after first check when
$input_digest is passed to test_policy_measurement().

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 +++++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 11 ++++-
 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

diff --git a/runtest/ima b/runtest/ima
index 5f4b4a7a1..123b6c8b0 100644
--- a/runtest/ima
+++ b/runtest/ima
@@ -5,4 +5,5 @@ ima_tpm ima_tpm.sh
 ima_violations ima_violations.sh
 ima_keys ima_keys.sh
 ima_kexec ima_kexec.sh
+ima_dm_crypt ima_dm_crypt.sh
 evm_overlay evm_overlay.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
index 68d046678..007662fae 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
@@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ see example in `kexec.policy`.
 The test attempts to kexec the existing running kernel image.
 To kexec a different kernel image export `IMA_KEXEC_IMAGE=<pathname>`.
 
+### IMA DM target (dm-crypt) measurement test
+
+To enable IMA to measure device-mapper target - dm-crypt,
+`ima_dm_crypt.sh` requires a readable IMA policy, as well as
+a loaded measure policy with
+`func=CRITICAL_DATA data_sources=dm-crypt`
+
+As well as what's required for the IMA tests, dm-crypt measurement test require
+reading the IMA policy allowed in the kernel configuration:
+```
+CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
+```
+
+The following kernel configuration is also required. It enables compiling
+the device-mapper target module dm-crypt, which allows to create a device
+that transparently encrypts the data on it.
+```
+CONFIG_DM_CRYPT
+```
+
 ## EVM tests
 
 `evm_overlay.sh` requires a builtin IMA appraise tcb policy (e.g. `ima_policy=appraise_tcb`
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..b49662f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
+# Author: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
+#
+# Verify that DM target dm-crypt are measured correctly based on policy.
+
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="dmsetup"
+TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
+TST_SETUP=setup
+TST_CLEANUP=cleanup
+
+. ima_setup.sh
+
+FUNC='func=CRITICAL_DATA'
+PATTERN='data_sources=[^[:space:]]+'
+REQUIRED_POLICY="^measure.*($FUNC.*$PATTERN|$PATTERN.*$FUNC)"
+
+setup()
+{
+	require_ima_policy_content "$REQUIRED_POLICY" '-E' > $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	ROD "dmsetup remove test-crypt"
+}
+
+test1()
+{
+	local input_digest="039d8ff71918608d585adca3e5aab2e3f41f84d6"
+	local key="faf453b4ee938cff2f0d2c869a0b743f59125c0a37f5bcd8f1dbbd911a78abaa"
+
+	tst_res TINFO "verifying dm-crypt target measurement"
+
+	ROD dmsetup create test-crypt --table "0 1953125 crypt aes-xts-plain64 $key 0 /dev/loop0 0 1 allow_discards"
+	check_policy_measurement data_sources $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt $input_digest
+}
+
+tst_run
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 605db0ff6..22bb4649d 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 	local input_digest="$3"
 	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
 	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
-	local i sources templates
+	local i input_digest_found sources templates
 
 	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
 
@@ -326,8 +326,17 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
 			return
 		fi
+
+		if [ "$input_digest" -a "$digest" = "$input_digest" ]; then
+			input_digest_found=1
+		fi
 	done < $grep_file
 
+	if [ "$input_digest" -a "$input_digest_found" != 1 ]; then
+		tst_res TFAIL "expected digest '$input_digest' not found"
+		return
+	fi
+
 	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
 }
 
-- 
2.30.1

[LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

New functionality is being added to IMA to measure data provided by
kernel components. With this feature, IMA policy can be set to enable
measuring data provided by device-mapper targets. Currently one such
device-mapper target - dm-crypt, is being updated to use this
functionality. This new functionality needs test automation in LTP.

Add a testcase which verifies that the IMA subsystem correctly measures
the data coming from a device-mapper target - dm-crypt.

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: adapt to previous commit changes, removed template=ima-buf,
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
I wonder if $input_digest and $input_digest_found is needed to be
considered in loop. Maybe there could be return after first check when
$input_digest is passed to test_policy_measurement().

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 +++++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 11 ++++-
 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

diff --git a/runtest/ima b/runtest/ima
index 5f4b4a7a1..123b6c8b0 100644
--- a/runtest/ima
+++ b/runtest/ima
@@ -5,4 +5,5 @@ ima_tpm ima_tpm.sh
 ima_violations ima_violations.sh
 ima_keys ima_keys.sh
 ima_kexec ima_kexec.sh
+ima_dm_crypt ima_dm_crypt.sh
 evm_overlay evm_overlay.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
index 68d046678..007662fae 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
@@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ see example in `kexec.policy`.
 The test attempts to kexec the existing running kernel image.
 To kexec a different kernel image export `IMA_KEXEC_IMAGE=<pathname>`.
 
+### IMA DM target (dm-crypt) measurement test
+
+To enable IMA to measure device-mapper target - dm-crypt,
+`ima_dm_crypt.sh` requires a readable IMA policy, as well as
+a loaded measure policy with
+`func=CRITICAL_DATA data_sources=dm-crypt`
+
+As well as what's required for the IMA tests, dm-crypt measurement test require
+reading the IMA policy allowed in the kernel configuration:
+```
+CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
+```
+
+The following kernel configuration is also required. It enables compiling
+the device-mapper target module dm-crypt, which allows to create a device
+that transparently encrypts the data on it.
+```
+CONFIG_DM_CRYPT
+```
+
 ## EVM tests
 
 `evm_overlay.sh` requires a builtin IMA appraise tcb policy (e.g. `ima_policy=appraise_tcb`
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..b49662f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
+# Author: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
+#
+# Verify that DM target dm-crypt are measured correctly based on policy.
+
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="dmsetup"
+TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
+TST_SETUP=setup
+TST_CLEANUP=cleanup
+
+. ima_setup.sh
+
+FUNC='func=CRITICAL_DATA'
+PATTERN='data_sources=[^[:space:]]+'
+REQUIRED_POLICY="^measure.*($FUNC.*$PATTERN|$PATTERN.*$FUNC)"
+
+setup()
+{
+	require_ima_policy_content "$REQUIRED_POLICY" '-E' > $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	ROD "dmsetup remove test-crypt"
+}
+
+test1()
+{
+	local input_digest="039d8ff71918608d585adca3e5aab2e3f41f84d6"
+	local key="faf453b4ee938cff2f0d2c869a0b743f59125c0a37f5bcd8f1dbbd911a78abaa"
+
+	tst_res TINFO "verifying dm-crypt target measurement"
+
+	ROD dmsetup create test-crypt --table "0 1953125 crypt aes-xts-plain64 $key 0 /dev/loop0 0 1 allow_discards"
+	check_policy_measurement data_sources $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt $input_digest
+}
+
+tst_run
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 605db0ff6..22bb4649d 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 	local input_digest="$3"
 	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
 	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
-	local i sources templates
+	local i input_digest_found sources templates
 
 	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
 
@@ -326,8 +326,17 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
 			return
 		fi
+
+		if [ "$input_digest" -a "$digest" = "$input_digest" ]; then
+			input_digest_found=1
+		fi
 	done < $grep_file
 
+	if [ "$input_digest" -a "$input_digest_found" != 1 ]; then
+		tst_res TFAIL "expected digest '$input_digest' not found"
+		return
+	fi
+
 	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
 }
 
-- 
2.30.1

[dm-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Petr Vorel]

From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>

New functionality is being added to IMA to measure data provided by
kernel components. With this feature, IMA policy can be set to enable
measuring data provided by device-mapper targets. Currently one such
device-mapper target - dm-crypt, is being updated to use this
functionality. This new functionality needs test automation in LTP.

Add a testcase which verifies that the IMA subsystem correctly measures
the data coming from a device-mapper target - dm-crypt.

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
[ pvorel: adapt to previous commit changes, removed template=ima-buf,
further cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
---
I wonder if $input_digest and $input_digest_found is needed to be
considered in loop. Maybe there could be return after first check when
$input_digest is passed to test_policy_measurement().

 runtest/ima                                   |  1 +
 .../kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md   | 20 +++++++++
 .../integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 11 ++++-
 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh

diff --git a/runtest/ima b/runtest/ima
index 5f4b4a7a1..123b6c8b0 100644
--- a/runtest/ima
+++ b/runtest/ima
@@ -5,4 +5,5 @@ ima_tpm ima_tpm.sh
 ima_violations ima_violations.sh
 ima_keys ima_keys.sh
 ima_kexec ima_kexec.sh
+ima_dm_crypt ima_dm_crypt.sh
 evm_overlay evm_overlay.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
index 68d046678..007662fae 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/README.md
@@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ see example in `kexec.policy`.
 The test attempts to kexec the existing running kernel image.
 To kexec a different kernel image export `IMA_KEXEC_IMAGE=<pathname>`.
 
+### IMA DM target (dm-crypt) measurement test
+
+To enable IMA to measure device-mapper target - dm-crypt,
+`ima_dm_crypt.sh` requires a readable IMA policy, as well as
+a loaded measure policy with
+`func=CRITICAL_DATA data_sources=dm-crypt`
+
+As well as what's required for the IMA tests, dm-crypt measurement test require
+reading the IMA policy allowed in the kernel configuration:
+```
+CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
+```
+
+The following kernel configuration is also required. It enables compiling
+the device-mapper target module dm-crypt, which allows to create a device
+that transparently encrypts the data on it.
+```
+CONFIG_DM_CRYPT
+```
+
 ## EVM tests
 
 `evm_overlay.sh` requires a builtin IMA appraise tcb policy (e.g. `ima_policy=appraise_tcb`
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..b49662f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_dm_crypt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation
+# Copyright (c) 2021 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
+# Author: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
+#
+# Verify that DM target dm-crypt are measured correctly based on policy.
+
+TST_NEEDS_CMDS="dmsetup"
+TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1
+TST_SETUP=setup
+TST_CLEANUP=cleanup
+
+. ima_setup.sh
+
+FUNC='func=CRITICAL_DATA'
+PATTERN='data_sources=[^[:space:]]+'
+REQUIRED_POLICY="^measure.*($FUNC.*$PATTERN|$PATTERN.*$FUNC)"
+
+setup()
+{
+	require_ima_policy_content "$REQUIRED_POLICY" '-E' > $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	ROD "dmsetup remove test-crypt"
+}
+
+test1()
+{
+	local input_digest="039d8ff71918608d585adca3e5aab2e3f41f84d6"
+	local key="faf453b4ee938cff2f0d2c869a0b743f59125c0a37f5bcd8f1dbbd911a78abaa"
+
+	tst_res TINFO "verifying dm-crypt target measurement"
+
+	ROD dmsetup create test-crypt --table "0 1953125 crypt aes-xts-plain64 $key 0 /dev/loop0 0 1 allow_discards"
+	check_policy_measurement data_sources $TST_TMPDIR/policy.txt $input_digest
+}
+
+tst_run
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
index 605db0ff6..22bb4649d 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 	local input_digest="$3"
 	local test_file="$TST_TMPDIR/test.txt"
 	local grep_file="$TST_TMPDIR/grep.txt"
-	local i sources templates
+	local i input_digest_found sources templates
 
 	tst_require_cmds cut sed xxd
 
@@ -326,8 +326,17 @@ test_policy_measurement()
 			tst_res TFAIL "incorrect digest was found for $src_line $policy_option"
 			return
 		fi
+
+		if [ "$input_digest" -a "$digest" = "$input_digest" ]; then
+			input_digest_found=1
+		fi
 	done < $grep_file
 
+	if [ "$input_digest" -a "$input_digest_found" != 1 ]; then
+		tst_res TFAIL "expected digest '$input_digest' not found"
+		return
+	fi
+
 	tst_res TPASS "$policy_option measured correctly"
 }
 
-- 
2.30.1


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Petr,

On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
> 
> Changes v2->v3
> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>   it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
> * further API and style related cleanup
> 
> Could you please check this patchset?

I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.  
 I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.

thanks,

Mimi

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Petr,

On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
> 
> Changes v2->v3
> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>   it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
> * further API and style related cleanup
> 
> Could you please check this patchset?

I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.  
 I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.

thanks,

Mimi

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Mimi Zohar]

Hi Petr,

On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
> 
> Changes v2->v3
> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>   it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
> * further API and style related cleanup
> 
> Could you please check this patchset?

I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.  
 I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.

thanks,

Mimi

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Tushar Sugandhi]

Hi Petr,

On 2021-02-23 4:43 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
>>
Thank you. :)

>> Changes v2->v3
>> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
>> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
>> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>>    it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
Makes sense.

>> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
>> * further API and style related cleanup
>>
>> Could you please check this patchset?
I reviewed the patchset.
Patch 1 looks ok. (generalize key measurement tests)
Patch 2 won't work as is, since the dm kernel code is not upstreamed
yet. (see my comments below for more context)

> 
> I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
> patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.
>   I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.
> 
That is correct.

The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management, more
relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.

Therefore, even though the first patch of the series "generalize key
measurement tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to
revisit the second patch, "dm-crypt measurements", to address the
DM side changes I mentioned above.

To summarize,
  - you may upstream the first patch (generalizing the key
    measurements). It would be useful for us while writing more tests in
    this space.

  - but please hold off upstreaming the second patch (dm-crypt test)
    as Mimi has suggested.

Thanks,
Tushar

> thanks,
> 
> Mimi
> 

[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Tushar Sugandhi]

Hi Petr,

On 2021-02-23 4:43 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
>>
Thank you. :)

>> Changes v2->v3
>> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
>> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
>> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>>    it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
Makes sense.

>> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
>> * further API and style related cleanup
>>
>> Could you please check this patchset?
I reviewed the patchset.
Patch 1 looks ok. (generalize key measurement tests)
Patch 2 won't work as is, since the dm kernel code is not upstreamed
yet. (see my comments below for more context)

> 
> I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
> patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.
>   I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.
> 
That is correct.

The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management, more
relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.

Therefore, even though the first patch of the series "generalize key
measurement tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to
revisit the second patch, "dm-crypt measurements", to address the
DM side changes I mentioned above.

To summarize,
  - you may upstream the first patch (generalizing the key
    measurements). It would be useful for us while writing more tests in
    this space.

  - but please hold off upstreaming the second patch (dm-crypt test)
    as Mimi has suggested.

Thanks,
Tushar

> thanks,
> 
> Mimi
> 

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] IMA: Add test for dm-crypt measurement

[Tushar Sugandhi]

Hi Petr,

On 2021-02-23 4:43 p.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 23:59 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I updated Tushar's patchset to speedup things.
>>
Thank you. :)

>> Changes v2->v3
>> * rename function s/check_ima_ascii_log_for_policy/test_policy_measurement/
>> * move tst_res TPASS/TFAIL into test_policy_measurement()
>> * drop template=ima-buf (see Lakshmi's patch [1] and discussion about
>>    it, it will be removed from ima_keys.sh as well)
Makes sense.

>> * moved ima_dm_crypt.sh specific changes to second commit
>> * further API and style related cleanup
>>
>> Could you please check this patchset?
I reviewed the patchset.
Patch 1 looks ok. (generalize key measurement tests)
Patch 2 won't work as is, since the dm kernel code is not upstreamed
yet. (see my comments below for more context)

> 
> I'm not sure about the status of the associated IMA dm-crypt kernel
> patch set.  It hasn't even been reviewed, definitely not upstreamed.
>   I would hold off on upstreaming the associated ltp test.
> 
That is correct.

The device mapper measurement work is being revisited - to cover aspects
like more DM targets (not just dm-crypt), better memory management, more
relevant attributes from the DM targets, other corner cases etc.

Therefore, even though the first patch of the series "generalize key
measurement tests", would be useful for other tests; I will have to
revisit the second patch, "dm-crypt measurements", to address the
DM side changes I mentioned above.

To summarize,
  - you may upstream the first patch (generalizing the key
    measurements). It would be useful for us while writing more tests in
    this space.

  - but please hold off upstreaming the second patch (dm-crypt test)
    as Mimi has suggested.

Thanks,
Tushar

> thanks,
> 
> Mimi
> 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel