All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, hare@suse.de,
	song@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	pavel.tide@veeam.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] block: add blk_interposer
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:27:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309172717.GB201344@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614774618-22410-3-git-send-email-sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>

> +static blk_qc_t __submit_bio_interposed(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	struct bio_list bio_list[2] = { };
> +	blk_qc_t ret = BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> +
> +	current->bio_list = bio_list;
> +	if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) {
> +		struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;
> +
> +		if (likely(bdev_has_interposer(bdev))) {
> +			bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED);
> +			bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio(bio);
> +		} else {
> +			/* interposer was removed */
> +			bio_list_add(&current->bio_list[0], bio);
> +		}
> +
> +		blk_queue_exit(bdev->bd_disk->queue);
> +	}
> +	current->bio_list = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Resubmit remaining bios */
> +	while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list[0])))
> +		ret = submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * submit_bio_noacct - re-submit a bio to the block device layer for I/O
>   * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> @@ -1043,6 +1071,14 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Checking the BIO_INTERPOSED flag is necessary so that the bio
> +	 * created by the bdev_interposer do not get to it for processing.
> +	 */
> +	if (bdev_has_interposer(bio->bi_bdev) &&
> +	    !bio_flagged(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED))
> +		return __submit_bio_interposed(bio);
> +
>  	if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->fops->submit_bio)
>  		return __submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio);
>  	return __submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index fcc530164b5a..1ae8516643c8 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
>  static struct kobject *block_depr;
>  
>  DECLARE_RWSEM(bdev_lookup_sem);
> +/*
> + * Prevents different block-layer interposers from attaching or detaching
> + * to the block device at the same time.
> + */
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(bdev_interposer_attach_lock);

This one can and should be marked static.

> +int bdev_interposer_attach(struct block_device *bdev, struct bdev_interposer *interposer,

Please avoid the overly long line.

> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!interposer))

WARN_ON_ONCE?

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!blk_mq_is_queue_frozen(bdev->bd_disk->queue))
> +		return -EPERM;

This probly should be a WARN_ON_ONCE() as well.

> +
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_interposer_attach_lock);
> +	if (bdev_has_interposer(bdev)) {
> +		if (bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio == ip_submit_bio)
> +			ret = -EALREADY;
> +		else
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

Do we really need the two different error codes here?

> +
> +	interposer->ip_submit_bio = ip_submit_bio;

I'd rather let the caller initialize the field instead of passing the
submit function separately.

> +void bdev_interposer_detach(struct bdev_interposer *interposer,
> +			  const ip_submit_bio_t ip_submit_bio)
> +{

> +	/* Check if it is really our interposer. */
> +	if (WARN_ON(bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio != ip_submit_bio))
> +		goto out;

I don't really see any need to pass ip_submit_bio just for this check.

> +	struct bdev_interposer * bd_interposer;

The * goes just before the member name.

> +/*
> + * block layer interposers structure and functions
> + */
> +typedef void (*ip_submit_bio_t) (struct bio *bio);
> +
> +struct bdev_interposer {
> +	ip_submit_bio_t ip_submit_bio;
> +	struct block_device *bdev;

Do we need the ip_ prefix here?  Also we probably don't really the
the typedef for the function pointer.

> +#define bdev_has_interposer(bd) ((bd)->bd_interposer != NULL)

And inline function would be nice here.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, snitzer@redhat.com,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, pavel.tide@veeam.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	song@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v6 2/4] block: add blk_interposer
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:27:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309172717.GB201344@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614774618-22410-3-git-send-email-sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>

> +static blk_qc_t __submit_bio_interposed(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	struct bio_list bio_list[2] = { };
> +	blk_qc_t ret = BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> +
> +	current->bio_list = bio_list;
> +	if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) {
> +		struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;
> +
> +		if (likely(bdev_has_interposer(bdev))) {
> +			bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED);
> +			bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio(bio);
> +		} else {
> +			/* interposer was removed */
> +			bio_list_add(&current->bio_list[0], bio);
> +		}
> +
> +		blk_queue_exit(bdev->bd_disk->queue);
> +	}
> +	current->bio_list = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Resubmit remaining bios */
> +	while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list[0])))
> +		ret = submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * submit_bio_noacct - re-submit a bio to the block device layer for I/O
>   * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> @@ -1043,6 +1071,14 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
>  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Checking the BIO_INTERPOSED flag is necessary so that the bio
> +	 * created by the bdev_interposer do not get to it for processing.
> +	 */
> +	if (bdev_has_interposer(bio->bi_bdev) &&
> +	    !bio_flagged(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED))
> +		return __submit_bio_interposed(bio);
> +
>  	if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->fops->submit_bio)
>  		return __submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio);
>  	return __submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index fcc530164b5a..1ae8516643c8 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
>  static struct kobject *block_depr;
>  
>  DECLARE_RWSEM(bdev_lookup_sem);
> +/*
> + * Prevents different block-layer interposers from attaching or detaching
> + * to the block device at the same time.
> + */
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(bdev_interposer_attach_lock);

This one can and should be marked static.

> +int bdev_interposer_attach(struct block_device *bdev, struct bdev_interposer *interposer,

Please avoid the overly long line.

> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!interposer))

WARN_ON_ONCE?

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!blk_mq_is_queue_frozen(bdev->bd_disk->queue))
> +		return -EPERM;

This probly should be a WARN_ON_ONCE() as well.

> +
> +	mutex_lock(&bdev_interposer_attach_lock);
> +	if (bdev_has_interposer(bdev)) {
> +		if (bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio == ip_submit_bio)
> +			ret = -EALREADY;
> +		else
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

Do we really need the two different error codes here?

> +
> +	interposer->ip_submit_bio = ip_submit_bio;

I'd rather let the caller initialize the field instead of passing the
submit function separately.

> +void bdev_interposer_detach(struct bdev_interposer *interposer,
> +			  const ip_submit_bio_t ip_submit_bio)
> +{

> +	/* Check if it is really our interposer. */
> +	if (WARN_ON(bdev->bd_interposer->ip_submit_bio != ip_submit_bio))
> +		goto out;

I don't really see any need to pass ip_submit_bio just for this check.

> +	struct bdev_interposer * bd_interposer;

The * goes just before the member name.

> +/*
> + * block layer interposers structure and functions
> + */
> +typedef void (*ip_submit_bio_t) (struct bio *bio);
> +
> +struct bdev_interposer {
> +	ip_submit_bio_t ip_submit_bio;
> +	struct block_device *bdev;

Do we need the ip_ prefix here?  Also we probably don't really the
the typedef for the function pointer.

> +#define bdev_has_interposer(bd) ((bd)->bd_interposer != NULL)

And inline function would be nice here.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03 12:30 [PATCH v6 0/4] block-layer interposer Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30 ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] block: add blk_mq_is_queue_frozen() Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30   ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-09 17:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-09 17:19     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-03 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] block: add blk_interposer Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30   ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-09 17:27   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-09 17:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-10  4:53     ` Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-10  4:53       ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-10 10:04       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-10 10:04         ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-03 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] dm: introduce dm-interposer Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30   ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] dm: add DM_INTERPOSED_FLAG Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-03 12:30   ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-09 17:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-09 17:35     ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-10  5:28     ` Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-10  5:28       ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-10 12:34       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-10 12:34         ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-11 10:54         ` Sergei Shtepa
2021-03-11 10:54           ` [dm-devel] " Sergei Shtepa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210309172717.GB201344@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel.tide@veeam.com \
    --cc=sergei.shtepa@veeam.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.