All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 13/22] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315122648.59e3dc85@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07b64ff1-a9d7-0393-36f4-8df4f87937f6@arm.com>

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:29:43 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
> 
> On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> > need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
> >
> > Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> > implement the old ioport interface, for now.
> >
> > We drop the usage of ioport__read8/write8 entirely, as this would only
> > be applicable for I/O port accesses, and does nothing for 8-bit wide
> > accesses anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/serial.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> > index b0465d99..c495eac1 100644
> > --- a/hw/serial.c
> > +++ b/hw/serial.c
> > @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
> >  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> > -			   void *data, int size)
> > +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
> >  {
> > -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > -	u16 offset;
> >  	bool ret = true;
> > -	char *addr = data;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >  
> > -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> > -
> >  	switch (offset) {
> >  	case UART_TX:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> > -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> > +			dev->dll = data;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/* Loopback mode */
> >  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
> >  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> > -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> > +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
> >  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
> >  			}
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> > -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> > +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
> >  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
> >  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
> >  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> > @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IER:
> >  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> > -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> > +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
> >  		else
> > -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> > +			dev->dlm = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_FCR:
> > -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->fcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LCR:
> > -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->lcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MCR:
> > -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->mcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LSR:
> >  		/* Factory test */
> > @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  		/* Not used */
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_SCR:
> > -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->scr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		ret = false;
> > @@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
> > +static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, u8 *data)
> >  {
> >  	if (dev->rxdone == dev->rxcnt)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -325,57 +320,54 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
> >  	/* Break issued ? */
> >  	if (dev->lsr & UART_LSR_BI) {
> >  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_BI;
> > -		ioport__write8(data, 0);
> > +		*data = 0;
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ioport__write8(data, dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++]);
> > +	*data = dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++];
> >  	if (dev->rxcnt == dev->rxdone) {
> >  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_DR;
> >  		dev->rxcnt = dev->rxdone = 0;
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
> >  {
> > -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > -	u16 offset;
> >  	bool ret = true;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >  
> > -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> > -
> >  	switch (offset) {
> >  	case UART_RX:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> > +			*data = dev->dll;
> >  		else
> >  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IER:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> > +			*data = dev->dlm;
> >  		else
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> > +			*data = dev->ier;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IIR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> > +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> > +		*data = dev->lcr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> > +		*data = dev->mcr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LSR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> > +		*data = dev->lsr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MSR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> > +		*data = dev->msr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_SCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> > +		*data = dev->scr;
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		ret = false;
> > @@ -389,6 +381,37 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }  
> 
> I'm not sure about replacing ioport_{read,write}8 with pointer dereferencing. They
> are functionally equivalent because big-endian and little-endian are about the
> order of bytes in memory, not the order of bits, but I don't think the change
> makes much sense because:
> 
> 1. All the other emulated devices use the ioport accessors, even in the case of 8
> bit accesses. For example, the RTC device uses ioport accessors and it too is
> converted in the end to a MMIO device, just like serial.
> 
> 2. The patch is about refactoring the emulation callbacks, other (non-trivial)
> changes should be a separate patch.
> 
> Please let me know if it's something that I'm missing. Other than this change, the
> patch looks good.

Well, I can see merits in both approaches: keeping the wrappers and
ditching them. Don't really have a strong opinion, but I think
eventually we should have the endian conversion in one central place
(in kvm__emulate_io()), where we can easily differentiate between port
I/O, MMIO and PCI accesses. Then all devices just need to dereference
pointers.
But this is indeed something for another time, and having wrappers
should not hurt either way, so I will keep them. Makes the patch smaller
anyway.

Cheers,
Andre

> >  
> > +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> > +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> > +
> > +	if (is_write)
> > +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, *data);
> > +	else
> > +		serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > +
> > +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, true, dev);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > +
> > +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, false, dev);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
> >  
> >  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> > @@ -427,8 +450,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> > -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> > -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> > +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> > +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 13/22] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315122648.59e3dc85@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07b64ff1-a9d7-0393-36f4-8df4f87937f6@arm.com>

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:29:43 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
> 
> On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> > need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
> >
> > Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> > implement the old ioport interface, for now.
> >
> > We drop the usage of ioport__read8/write8 entirely, as this would only
> > be applicable for I/O port accesses, and does nothing for 8-bit wide
> > accesses anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/serial.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> > index b0465d99..c495eac1 100644
> > --- a/hw/serial.c
> > +++ b/hw/serial.c
> > @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
> >  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> > -			   void *data, int size)
> > +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
> >  {
> > -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > -	u16 offset;
> >  	bool ret = true;
> > -	char *addr = data;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >  
> > -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> > -
> >  	switch (offset) {
> >  	case UART_TX:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> > -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> > +			dev->dll = data;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/* Loopback mode */
> >  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
> >  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> > -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> > +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
> >  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
> >  			}
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> > -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> > +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
> >  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
> >  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
> >  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> > @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IER:
> >  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> > -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> > +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
> >  		else
> > -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> > +			dev->dlm = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_FCR:
> > -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->fcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LCR:
> > -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->lcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MCR:
> > -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->mcr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LSR:
> >  		/* Factory test */
> > @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  		/* Not used */
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_SCR:
> > -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> > +		dev->scr = data;
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		ret = false;
> > @@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
> > +static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, u8 *data)
> >  {
> >  	if (dev->rxdone == dev->rxcnt)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -325,57 +320,54 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
> >  	/* Break issued ? */
> >  	if (dev->lsr & UART_LSR_BI) {
> >  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_BI;
> > -		ioport__write8(data, 0);
> > +		*data = 0;
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ioport__write8(data, dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++]);
> > +	*data = dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++];
> >  	if (dev->rxcnt == dev->rxdone) {
> >  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_DR;
> >  		dev->rxcnt = dev->rxdone = 0;
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
> >  {
> > -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > -	u16 offset;
> >  	bool ret = true;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >  
> > -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> > -
> >  	switch (offset) {
> >  	case UART_RX:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> > +			*data = dev->dll;
> >  		else
> >  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IER:
> >  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> > +			*data = dev->dlm;
> >  		else
> > -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> > +			*data = dev->ier;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_IIR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> > +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> > +		*data = dev->lcr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> > +		*data = dev->mcr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_LSR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> > +		*data = dev->lsr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_MSR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> > +		*data = dev->msr;
> >  		break;
> >  	case UART_SCR:
> > -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> > +		*data = dev->scr;
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		ret = false;
> > @@ -389,6 +381,37 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }  
> 
> I'm not sure about replacing ioport_{read,write}8 with pointer dereferencing. They
> are functionally equivalent because big-endian and little-endian are about the
> order of bytes in memory, not the order of bits, but I don't think the change
> makes much sense because:
> 
> 1. All the other emulated devices use the ioport accessors, even in the case of 8
> bit accesses. For example, the RTC device uses ioport accessors and it too is
> converted in the end to a MMIO device, just like serial.
> 
> 2. The patch is about refactoring the emulation callbacks, other (non-trivial)
> changes should be a separate patch.
> 
> Please let me know if it's something that I'm missing. Other than this change, the
> patch looks good.

Well, I can see merits in both approaches: keeping the wrappers and
ditching them. Don't really have a strong opinion, but I think
eventually we should have the endian conversion in one central place
(in kvm__emulate_io()), where we can easily differentiate between port
I/O, MMIO and PCI accesses. Then all devices just need to dereference
pointers.
But this is indeed something for another time, and having wrappers
should not hurt either way, so I will keep them. Makes the patch smaller
anyway.

Cheers,
Andre

> >  
> > +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> > +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> > +
> > +	if (is_write)
> > +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, *data);
> > +	else
> > +		serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > +
> > +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, true, dev);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> > +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> > +{
> > +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> > +
> > +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, false, dev);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
> >  
> >  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> > @@ -427,8 +450,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> > -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> > -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> > +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> > +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,  

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  0:58 [PATCH kvmtool v2 00/22] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 01/22] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-02 18:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 18:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 02/22] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 03/22] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 04/22] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-03 17:58   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-03 17:58     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:24     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:24       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 05/22] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 06/22] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-08 17:16   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-08 17:16     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 07/22] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-08 17:22   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-08 17:22     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 08/22] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 11:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 11:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 09/22] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 12:09   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 12:09     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 10/22] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 11/22] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 12/22] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 13/22] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-12 11:29   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-12 11:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 14/22] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 15/22] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 14:21   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 14:21     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 16/22] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 17/22] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 14:43   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 14:43     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 18/22] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 19/22] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 15:13   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 15:13     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 20/22] arm: Reorganise and document memory map Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 15:46   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 15:46     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:27     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:27       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 21/22] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 16:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 16:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:27     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:27       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 22/22] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 16:06   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 16:06     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 17:57 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 00/22] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 17:57   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-03 18:41   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-03 18:41     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210315122648.59e3dc85@slackpad.fritz.box \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.