* [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show()
@ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij
Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa
These patches fix the pcs_pin_dbg_show() function for the scenario where
a single register controls multiple pins (i.e. bits_per_mux is not zero)
Additionally, the common formula is moved to a separate function to
allow reuse.
Changes since v2:
-----------------
- move read() register to be outside of if condition (as it common
read()).
- Remove extra parentheses
- replace offset variable by direct return statements
Changes since v1:
-----------------
- remove unused variable in In function 'pcs_allocate_pin_table'
(Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)
Hanna Hawa (3):
pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable
pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter
pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is
not zero
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show() @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa These patches fix the pcs_pin_dbg_show() function for the scenario where a single register controls multiple pins (i.e. bits_per_mux is not zero) Additionally, the common formula is moved to a separate function to allow reuse. Changes since v2: ----------------- - move read() register to be outside of if condition (as it common read()). - Remove extra parentheses - replace offset variable by direct return statements Changes since v1: ----------------- - remove unused variable in In function 'pcs_allocate_pin_table' (Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) Hanna Hawa (3): pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa Remove unused parameter 'num_pins_in_register' from pcs_allocate_pin_table(). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 7771316dfffa..91c638b85d2c 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -703,14 +703,12 @@ static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned offset, static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) { int mux_bytes, nr_pins, i; - int num_pins_in_register = 0; mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { pcs->bits_per_pin = fls(pcs->fmask); nr_pins = (pcs->size * BITS_PER_BYTE) / pcs->bits_per_pin; - num_pins_in_register = pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin; } else { nr_pins = pcs->size / mux_bytes; } -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa Remove unused parameter 'num_pins_in_register' from pcs_allocate_pin_table(). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 7771316dfffa..91c638b85d2c 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -703,14 +703,12 @@ static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned offset, static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) { int mux_bytes, nr_pins, i; - int num_pins_in_register = 0; mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { pcs->bits_per_pin = fls(pcs->fmask); nr_pins = (pcs->size * BITS_PER_BYTE) / pcs->bits_per_pin; - num_pins_in_register = pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin; } else { nr_pins = pcs->size / mux_bytes; } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa Remove unused parameter 'pin_pos' from pcs_add_pin(). Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 91c638b85d2c..f3394517cb2e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -656,10 +656,8 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops pcs_pinconf_ops = { * pcs_add_pin() - add a pin to the static per controller pin array * @pcs: pcs driver instance * @offset: register offset from base - * @pin_pos: unused */ -static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned offset, - unsigned pin_pos) +static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned int offset) { struct pcs_soc_data *pcs_soc = &pcs->socdata; struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin; @@ -727,16 +725,14 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) unsigned offset; int res; int byte_num; - int pin_pos = 0; if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - pin_pos = i % num_pins_in_register; } else { offset = i * mux_bytes; } - res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset, pin_pos); + res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); if (res < 0) { dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); return res; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa Remove unused parameter 'pin_pos' from pcs_add_pin(). Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 91c638b85d2c..f3394517cb2e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -656,10 +656,8 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops pcs_pinconf_ops = { * pcs_add_pin() - add a pin to the static per controller pin array * @pcs: pcs driver instance * @offset: register offset from base - * @pin_pos: unused */ -static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned offset, - unsigned pin_pos) +static int pcs_add_pin(struct pcs_device *pcs, unsigned int offset) { struct pcs_soc_data *pcs_soc = &pcs->socdata; struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin; @@ -727,16 +725,14 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) unsigned offset; int res; int byte_num; - int pin_pos = 0; if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - pin_pos = i % num_pins_in_register; } else { offset = i * mux_bytes; } - res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset, pin_pos); + res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); if (res < 0) { dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); return res; -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in register to common function. Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) writel(val, reg); } +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, + unsigned int pin) +{ + unsigned int mux_bytes; + + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; + + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; + + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; + } + + return pin * mux_bytes; +} + +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, + unsigned int pin) +{ + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; +} + static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct seq_file *s, unsigned pin) { struct pcs_device *pcs; - unsigned val, mux_bytes; + unsigned int val; unsigned long offset; size_t pa; pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = pin * mux_bytes; + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); + + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) + val &= pcs->fmask << pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); + pa = pcs->res->start + offset; seq_printf(s, "%zx %08x %s ", pa, val, DRIVER_NAME); @@ -384,7 +410,6 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); struct pcs_gpiofunc_range *frange = NULL; struct list_head *pos, *tmp; - int mux_bytes = 0; unsigned data; /* If function mask is null, return directly. */ @@ -392,29 +417,27 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return -ENOTSUPP; list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &pcs->gpiofuncs) { + u32 offset; + frange = list_entry(pos, struct pcs_gpiofunc_range, node); if (pin >= frange->offset + frange->npins || pin < frange->offset) continue; - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { - int byte_num, offset, pin_shift; + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - pin_shift = pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin) * - pcs->bits_per_pin; + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { + int pin_shift = pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); data &= ~(pcs->fmask << pin_shift); data |= frange->gpiofunc << pin_shift; pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); } else { - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); + data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); data &= ~pcs->fmask; data |= frange->gpiofunc; - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); + pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); } break; } @@ -724,14 +747,8 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) for (i = 0; i < pcs->desc.npins; i++) { unsigned offset; int res; - int byte_num; - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - } else { - offset = i * mux_bytes; - } + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, i); res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); if (res < 0) { dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero @ 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-17 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: andy.shevchenko, tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in register to common function. Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) writel(val, reg); } +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, + unsigned int pin) +{ + unsigned int mux_bytes; + + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; + + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; + + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; + } + + return pin * mux_bytes; +} + +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, + unsigned int pin) +{ + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; +} + static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct seq_file *s, unsigned pin) { struct pcs_device *pcs; - unsigned val, mux_bytes; + unsigned int val; unsigned long offset; size_t pa; pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = pin * mux_bytes; + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); + + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) + val &= pcs->fmask << pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); + pa = pcs->res->start + offset; seq_printf(s, "%zx %08x %s ", pa, val, DRIVER_NAME); @@ -384,7 +410,6 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); struct pcs_gpiofunc_range *frange = NULL; struct list_head *pos, *tmp; - int mux_bytes = 0; unsigned data; /* If function mask is null, return directly. */ @@ -392,29 +417,27 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return -ENOTSUPP; list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &pcs->gpiofuncs) { + u32 offset; + frange = list_entry(pos, struct pcs_gpiofunc_range, node); if (pin >= frange->offset + frange->npins || pin < frange->offset) continue; - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { - int byte_num, offset, pin_shift; + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - pin_shift = pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin) * - pcs->bits_per_pin; + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { + int pin_shift = pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); data &= ~(pcs->fmask << pin_shift); data |= frange->gpiofunc << pin_shift; pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); } else { - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); + data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); data &= ~pcs->fmask; data |= frange->gpiofunc; - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); + pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); } break; } @@ -724,14 +747,8 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) for (i = 0; i < pcs->desc.npins; i++) { unsigned offset; int res; - int byte_num; - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; - } else { - offset = i * mux_bytes; - } + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, i); res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); if (res < 0) { dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-18 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-18 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hanna Hawa Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > > An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? > pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change > fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux > is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in > register to common function. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") > Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) > writel(val, reg); > } > > +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, > + unsigned int pin) > +{ > + unsigned int mux_bytes; > + > + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; Can be folded to one line. > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; > + > + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; Side note for the further improvements (in a separate change, because I see that you just copied an original code, and after all this is just a fix patch): this can be replaced by round down APIs (one which works for arbitrary divisors). > + } > + > + return pin * mux_bytes; > +} > + > +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, > + unsigned int pin) > +{ > + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; Also a side note: I'm wondering if this can be optimized to have less divisions. > +} > + > static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct seq_file *s, > unsigned pin) > { > struct pcs_device *pcs; > - unsigned val, mux_bytes; > + unsigned int val; > unsigned long offset; > size_t pa; > > pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > > - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = pin * mux_bytes; > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); > val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > + > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) > + val &= pcs->fmask << pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); > + > pa = pcs->res->start + offset; > > seq_printf(s, "%zx %08x %s ", pa, val, DRIVER_NAME); > @@ -384,7 +410,6 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > struct pcs_gpiofunc_range *frange = NULL; > struct list_head *pos, *tmp; > - int mux_bytes = 0; > unsigned data; > > /* If function mask is null, return directly. */ > @@ -392,29 +417,27 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > return -ENOTSUPP; > > list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &pcs->gpiofuncs) { > + u32 offset; > + > frange = list_entry(pos, struct pcs_gpiofunc_range, node); > if (pin >= frange->offset + frange->npins > || pin < frange->offset) > continue; > - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > > - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > - int byte_num, offset, pin_shift; > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); > > - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > - pin_shift = pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin) * > - pcs->bits_per_pin; > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > + int pin_shift = pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); > > data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > data &= ~(pcs->fmask << pin_shift); > data |= frange->gpiofunc << pin_shift; > pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); > } else { > - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); > + data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > data &= ~pcs->fmask; > data |= frange->gpiofunc; > - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); > + pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); > } > break; > } > @@ -724,14 +747,8 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) > for (i = 0; i < pcs->desc.npins; i++) { > unsigned offset; > int res; > - int byte_num; > > - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > - } else { > - offset = i * mux_bytes; > - } > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, i); > res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); > if (res < 0) { > dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); > -- > 2.17.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero @ 2021-03-18 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-18 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hanna Hawa Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > > An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? > pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change > fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux > is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in > register to common function. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") > Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) > writel(val, reg); > } > > +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, > + unsigned int pin) > +{ > + unsigned int mux_bytes; > + > + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; Can be folded to one line. > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; > + > + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; Side note for the further improvements (in a separate change, because I see that you just copied an original code, and after all this is just a fix patch): this can be replaced by round down APIs (one which works for arbitrary divisors). > + } > + > + return pin * mux_bytes; > +} > + > +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, > + unsigned int pin) > +{ > + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; Also a side note: I'm wondering if this can be optimized to have less divisions. > +} > + > static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct seq_file *s, > unsigned pin) > { > struct pcs_device *pcs; > - unsigned val, mux_bytes; > + unsigned int val; > unsigned long offset; > size_t pa; > > pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > > - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = pin * mux_bytes; > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); > val = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > + > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) > + val &= pcs->fmask << pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); > + > pa = pcs->res->start + offset; > > seq_printf(s, "%zx %08x %s ", pa, val, DRIVER_NAME); > @@ -384,7 +410,6 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > struct pcs_gpiofunc_range *frange = NULL; > struct list_head *pos, *tmp; > - int mux_bytes = 0; > unsigned data; > > /* If function mask is null, return directly. */ > @@ -392,29 +417,27 @@ static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > return -ENOTSUPP; > > list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &pcs->gpiofuncs) { > + u32 offset; > + > frange = list_entry(pos, struct pcs_gpiofunc_range, node); > if (pin >= frange->offset + frange->npins > || pin < frange->offset) > continue; > - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > > - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > - int byte_num, offset, pin_shift; > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, pin); > > - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > - pin_shift = pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin) * > - pcs->bits_per_pin; > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > + int pin_shift = pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(pcs, pin); > > data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > data &= ~(pcs->fmask << pin_shift); > data |= frange->gpiofunc << pin_shift; > pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); > } else { > - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); > + data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > data &= ~pcs->fmask; > data |= frange->gpiofunc; > - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); > + pcs->write(data, pcs->base + offset); > } > break; > } > @@ -724,14 +747,8 @@ static int pcs_allocate_pin_table(struct pcs_device *pcs) > for (i = 0; i < pcs->desc.npins; i++) { > unsigned offset; > int res; > - int byte_num; > > - if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { > - byte_num = (pcs->bits_per_pin * i) / BITS_PER_BYTE; > - offset = (byte_num / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > - } else { > - offset = i * mux_bytes; > - } > + offset = pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(pcs, i); > res = pcs_add_pin(pcs, offset); > if (res < 0) { > dev_err(pcs->dev, "error adding pins: %i\n", res); > -- > 2.17.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero 2021-03-18 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-19 7:52 ` Hawa, Hanna -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hawa, Hanna @ 2021-03-19 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 3/18/2021 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: >> An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a > What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: > if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting > an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? What you suggest? s/An SError/A kernel-panic/? Or remove the sentence and keep the below: " This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in register to common function. " > >> pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change >> fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux >> is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in >> register to common function. > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Thanks > >> Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") >> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) >> writel(val, reg); >> } >> >> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, >> + unsigned int pin) >> +{ >> + unsigned int mux_bytes; >> + >> + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > Can be folded to one line. Ack > >> + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { >> + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; >> + >> + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; >> + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > Side note for the further improvements (in a separate change, because > I see that you just copied an original code, and after all this is > just a fix patch): this can be replaced by round down APIs (one which > works for arbitrary divisors). Agree, didn't want to change the formula as it's fix patch. (here and below), this can be taken for further improvements. > >> + } >> + >> + return pin * mux_bytes; >> +} >> + >> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, >> + unsigned int pin) >> +{ >> + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; > Also a side note: I'm wondering if this can be optimized to have less divisions. > >> +} >> + >> static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> struct seq_file *s, >> unsigned pin) >> { Thanks, Hanna ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero @ 2021-03-19 7:52 ` Hawa, Hanna 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hawa, Hanna @ 2021-03-19 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 3/18/2021 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: >> An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a > What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: > if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting > an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? What you suggest? s/An SError/A kernel-panic/? Or remove the sentence and keep the below: " This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in register to common function. " > >> pinctrl device which supports multiple pins per register. This change >> fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux >> is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin offset in >> register to common function. > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Thanks > >> Fixes: 4e7e8017a80e ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules") >> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> index f3394517cb2e..4595acf6545e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c >> @@ -270,20 +270,46 @@ static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg) >> writel(val, reg); >> } >> >> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_reg_offset_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, >> + unsigned int pin) >> +{ >> + unsigned int mux_bytes; >> + >> + mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; > Can be folded to one line. Ack > >> + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) { >> + unsigned int pin_offset_bytes; >> + >> + pin_offset_bytes = (pcs->bits_per_pin * pin) / BITS_PER_BYTE; >> + return (pin_offset_bytes / mux_bytes) * mux_bytes; > Side note for the further improvements (in a separate change, because > I see that you just copied an original code, and after all this is > just a fix patch): this can be replaced by round down APIs (one which > works for arbitrary divisors). Agree, didn't want to change the formula as it's fix patch. (here and below), this can be taken for further improvements. > >> + } >> + >> + return pin * mux_bytes; >> +} >> + >> +static unsigned int pcs_pin_shift_reg_get(struct pcs_device *pcs, >> + unsigned int pin) >> +{ >> + return (pin % (pcs->width / pcs->bits_per_pin)) * pcs->bits_per_pin; > Also a side note: I'm wondering if this can be optimized to have less divisions. > >> +} >> + >> static void pcs_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >> struct seq_file *s, >> unsigned pin) >> { Thanks, Hanna _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero 2021-03-19 7:52 ` Hawa, Hanna @ 2021-03-19 10:04 ` Andy Shevchenko -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-19 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hawa, Hanna Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:53 AM Hawa, Hanna <hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > On 3/18/2021 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > >> An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a > > What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: > > if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting > > an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? > > What you suggest? > s/An SError/A kernel-panic/? Not below, but something which makes clear what SError is. Like "A System Error (SError, followed by kernel panic) ..." > Or remove the sentence and keep the below: > " > This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when > bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin > offset in register to common function. > " -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero @ 2021-03-19 10:04 ` Andy Shevchenko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-19 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hawa, Hanna Cc: Tony Lindgren, Haojian Zhuang, Linus Walleij, David Woodhouse, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm Mailing List, Linux OMAP Mailing List, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:53 AM Hawa, Hanna <hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > On 3/18/2021 2:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42 PM Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote: > >> An SError was detected when trying to print the supported pins in a > > What is SError? Yes, I have read a discussion, but here is the hint: > > if a person sees this as a first text due to, for example, bisecting > > an issue, what she/he can get from this cryptic name? > > What you suggest? > s/An SError/A kernel-panic/? Not below, but something which makes clear what SError is. Like "A System Error (SError, followed by kernel panic) ..." > Or remove the sentence and keep the below: > " > This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in pinctrl-single driver when > bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move offset calculation and pin > offset in register to common function. > " -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show() @ 2021-03-16 20:24 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-16 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa These patches fix the pcs_pin_dbg_show() function for the scenario where a single register controls multiple pins (i.e. bits_per_mux != 0). Additionally, the common formula is moved to a separate function to allow reuse. Changes since v1: ----------------- - remove unused variable in In function 'pcs_allocate_pin_table' (Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) Hanna Hawa (3): pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux != 0 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show() @ 2021-03-16 20:24 ` Hanna Hawa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hanna Hawa @ 2021-03-16 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tony, haojian.zhuang, linus.walleij Cc: dwmw, benh, ronenk, talel, jonnyc, hanochu, tgershi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, hhhawa These patches fix the pcs_pin_dbg_show() function for the scenario where a single register controls multiple pins (i.e. bits_per_mux != 0). Additionally, the common formula is moved to a separate function to allow reuse. Changes since v1: ----------------- - remove unused variable in In function 'pcs_allocate_pin_table' (Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>) Hanna Hawa (3): pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux != 0 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-19 10:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-03-17 21:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show() Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused variable Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove unused parameter Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: fix pcs_pin_dbg_show() when bits_per_mux is not zero Hanna Hawa 2021-03-17 21:41 ` Hanna Hawa 2021-03-18 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-18 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-19 7:52 ` Hawa, Hanna 2021-03-19 7:52 ` Hawa, Hanna 2021-03-19 10:04 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-03-19 10:04 ` Andy Shevchenko -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-03-16 20:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pinctrl-single pcs_pin_dbg_show() Hanna Hawa 2021-03-16 20:24 ` Hanna Hawa
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.