From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
'Guenter Roeck' <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 06:44:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210318054415.GB1053@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec89dfda-a321-6ec7-9da0-b4949f1f28b5@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]
> Probably depends on the device implementation. I've got multiple other
> I2C/SMBUS devices and the LM81 seems to be the one that objects.
For the recored, there was just a similar case with a DA9063, but that
one luckily had a bit to switch from SMBus to I2C mode, i.e. no timeout
handling:
[PATCH v6 1/1] mfd: da9063: Support SMBus and I2C mode
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
'Guenter Roeck' <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 06:44:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210318054415.GB1053@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec89dfda-a321-6ec7-9da0-b4949f1f28b5@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]
> Probably depends on the device implementation. I've got multiple other
> I2C/SMBUS devices and the LM81 seems to be the one that objects.
For the recored, there was just a similar case with a DA9063, but that
one luckily had a bit to switch from SMBus to I2C mode, i.e. no timeout
handling:
[PATCH v6 1/1] mfd: da9063: Support SMBus and I2C mode
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-07 22:52 Errant readings on LM81 with T2080 SoC Chris Packham
2021-03-07 22:52 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 0:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 0:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 2:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 2:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 4:37 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 4:37 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 4:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 4:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 20:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 20:27 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 22:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-08 22:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 2:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 2:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 5:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 5:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 21:48 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 21:48 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 7:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 7:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 8:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-11 8:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-11 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 21:17 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 21:17 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 21:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 21:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 23:47 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-11 23:47 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-12 0:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-12 0:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-12 0:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-12 0:19 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-12 9:25 ` David Laight
2021-03-14 21:26 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-15 9:46 ` David Laight
2021-03-18 5:44 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2021-03-18 5:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-18 3:46 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-18 3:46 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-18 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-18 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-18 5:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-18 5:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-08 22:10 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-08 22:10 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 4:36 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 4:36 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 5:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-09 5:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-09 23:35 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-09 23:35 ` Chris Packham
2021-03-10 3:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-10 3:29 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210318054415.GB1053@kunai \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.