From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf. Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:49:59 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-11-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> As soon as we install fences, we should stop allocating memory in order to prevent any potential deadlocks. This is required later on, when we start adding support for dma-fence annotations. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 20 ++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 8 ++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 1c6d0d92701f..3c37a85c0d9d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -50,11 +50,12 @@ enum { #define DBG_FORCE_RELOC 0 /* choose one of the above! */ }; -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN BIT(31) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE BIT(30) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(29) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(28) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 28) /* all of the above */ +/* __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE is BIT(31), defined in i915_vma.h */ +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN BIT(30) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE BIT(29) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(28) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(27) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 27) /* all of the above + */ #define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE) #define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC BIT(31) @@ -935,6 +936,12 @@ static int eb_validate_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) } } + if (!(ev->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE)) { + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); + if (err) + return err; + } + GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node) && eb_vma_misplaced(&eb->exec[i], vma, ev->flags)); } @@ -2195,7 +2202,8 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) } if (err == 0) - err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags); + err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, + flags | __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE); } if (unlikely(err)) @@ -2447,6 +2455,10 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, if (err) goto err_commit; + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(shadow->resv, 1); + if (err) + goto err_commit; + /* Wait for all writes (and relocs) into the batch to complete */ err = i915_sw_fence_await_reservation(&pw->base.chain, pw->batch->resv, NULL, false, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c index 3bc616cc1ad2..cf9a3d384971 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c @@ -293,18 +293,13 @@ static struct active_node *__active_lookup(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) static struct i915_active_fence * active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) { - struct active_node *node, *prealloc; + struct active_node *node; struct rb_node **p, *parent; node = __active_lookup(ref, idx); if (likely(node)) return &node->base; - /* Preallocate a replacement, just in case */ - prealloc = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!prealloc) - return NULL; - spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock); GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref)); @@ -314,10 +309,8 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) parent = *p; node = rb_entry(parent, struct active_node, node); - if (node->timeline == idx) { - kmem_cache_free(global.slab_cache, prealloc); + if (node->timeline == idx) goto out; - } if (node->timeline < idx) p = &parent->rb_right; @@ -325,7 +318,14 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) p = &parent->rb_left; } - node = prealloc; + /* + * XXX: We should preallocate this before i915_active_ref() is ever + * called, but we cannot call into fs_reclaim() anyway, so use GFP_ATOMIC. + */ + node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!node) + goto out; + __i915_active_fence_init(&node->base, NULL, node_retire); node->ref = ref; node->timeline = idx; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c index 7310893086f7..1ffda2aaa7a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c @@ -1247,9 +1247,11 @@ int i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, obj->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER; obj->read_domains = 0; } else { - err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); - if (unlikely(err)) - return err; + if (!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE)) { + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); + if (unlikely(err)) + return err; + } dma_resv_add_shared_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence); obj->write_domain = 0; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h index 3c914c9de9a9..6b48f5c42488 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool i915_vma_is_active(const struct i915_vma *vma) return !i915_active_is_idle(&vma->active); } +/* do not reserve memory to prevent deadlocks */ +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE BIT(31) + int __must_check __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_request *rq); int __must_check i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, -- 2.31.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf. Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:49:59 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210323155059.628690-11-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210323155059.628690-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> As soon as we install fences, we should stop allocating memory in order to prevent any potential deadlocks. This is required later on, when we start adding support for dma-fence annotations. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 20 ++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 8 ++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 1c6d0d92701f..3c37a85c0d9d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -50,11 +50,12 @@ enum { #define DBG_FORCE_RELOC 0 /* choose one of the above! */ }; -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN BIT(31) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE BIT(30) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(29) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(28) -#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 28) /* all of the above */ +/* __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE is BIT(31), defined in i915_vma.h */ +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN BIT(30) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE BIT(29) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP BIT(28) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS BIT(27) +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0u << 27) /* all of the above + */ #define __EXEC_OBJECT_RESERVED (__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE) #define __EXEC_HAS_RELOC BIT(31) @@ -935,6 +936,12 @@ static int eb_validate_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) } } + if (!(ev->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE)) { + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); + if (err) + return err; + } + GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node) && eb_vma_misplaced(&eb->exec[i], vma, ev->flags)); } @@ -2195,7 +2202,8 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) } if (err == 0) - err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, flags); + err = i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, eb->request, + flags | __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE); } if (unlikely(err)) @@ -2447,6 +2455,10 @@ static int eb_parse_pipeline(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, if (err) goto err_commit; + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(shadow->resv, 1); + if (err) + goto err_commit; + /* Wait for all writes (and relocs) into the batch to complete */ err = i915_sw_fence_await_reservation(&pw->base.chain, pw->batch->resv, NULL, false, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c index 3bc616cc1ad2..cf9a3d384971 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c @@ -293,18 +293,13 @@ static struct active_node *__active_lookup(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) static struct i915_active_fence * active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) { - struct active_node *node, *prealloc; + struct active_node *node; struct rb_node **p, *parent; node = __active_lookup(ref, idx); if (likely(node)) return &node->base; - /* Preallocate a replacement, just in case */ - prealloc = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!prealloc) - return NULL; - spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock); GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref)); @@ -314,10 +309,8 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) parent = *p; node = rb_entry(parent, struct active_node, node); - if (node->timeline == idx) { - kmem_cache_free(global.slab_cache, prealloc); + if (node->timeline == idx) goto out; - } if (node->timeline < idx) p = &parent->rb_right; @@ -325,7 +318,14 @@ active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx) p = &parent->rb_left; } - node = prealloc; + /* + * XXX: We should preallocate this before i915_active_ref() is ever + * called, but we cannot call into fs_reclaim() anyway, so use GFP_ATOMIC. + */ + node = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_cache, GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!node) + goto out; + __i915_active_fence_init(&node->base, NULL, node_retire); node->ref = ref; node->timeline = idx; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c index 7310893086f7..1ffda2aaa7a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c @@ -1247,9 +1247,11 @@ int i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, obj->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER; obj->read_domains = 0; } else { - err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); - if (unlikely(err)) - return err; + if (!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE)) { + err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->resv, 1); + if (unlikely(err)) + return err; + } dma_resv_add_shared_fence(vma->resv, &rq->fence); obj->write_domain = 0; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h index 3c914c9de9a9..6b48f5c42488 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ static inline bool i915_vma_is_active(const struct i915_vma *vma) return !i915_active_is_idle(&vma->active); } +/* do not reserve memory to prevent deadlocks */ +#define __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE BIT(31) + int __must_check __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_request *rq); int __must_check i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, -- 2.31.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 15:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 207+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-23 15:49 [PATCH v9 00/70] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 01/70] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v8 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 02/70] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v4 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 03/70] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 04/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 05/70] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 06/70] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 07/70] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 08/70] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/70] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:49 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message] 2021-03-23 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 10/70] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 11/70] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand 2021-03-24 13:57 ` Jason Ekstrand 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 12/70] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 13/70] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 14/70] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 15/70] drm/i915: Make compilation of userptr code depend on MMU_NOTIFIER Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 16/70] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v7 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-24 11:34 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 9:23 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v8 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-25 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-25 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 9:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström (Intel) 2021-03-25 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-25 10:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 17/70] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 18/70] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 19/70] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 20/70] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 21/70] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 22/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 23/70] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 24/70] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 25/70] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 26/70] drm/i915: Make lrc_init_wa_ctx compatible with ww locking, v3 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 27/70] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 28/70] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 14:12 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 29/70] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 30/70] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 31/70] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 32/70] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 16:18 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-03-23 20:25 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 33/70] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 34/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 35/70] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 36/70] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 37/70] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 38/70] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 39/70] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 40/70] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 41/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 42/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 43/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 44/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 45/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 46/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 47/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 48/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 49/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 50/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 51/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 52/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 53/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists and lrc selftests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 54/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 55/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 56/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 57/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 58/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 59/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 60/70] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 61/70] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 62/70] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 63/70] drm/i915: Move gt_revoke() slightly Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:00 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-24 17:58 ` Ville Syrjälä 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 64/70] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK path in execbuffer ggtt pinning Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:05 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 65/70] drm/i915: Fix pin_map in scheduler selftests Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 66/70] drm/i915: Add ww parameter to get_pages() callback Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:20 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 67/70] drm/i915: Add ww context to prepare_(read/write) Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 68/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-23 17:30 ` Matthew Auld 2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 10:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 11:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to pin_map, v2 Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 69/70] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to i915_gem_object_pin_pages Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 70/70] drm/i915: Remove asynchronous vma binding Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-23 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst 2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-24 17:19 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-03-23 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev18) Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2021-03-23 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev19) Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-03-24 12:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2021-03-24 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork 2021-03-25 21:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev20) Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210323155059.628690-11-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.