All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch,
	vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow dynamic reconfiguration of tag protocol
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:08:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324150807.f2amekt2jdcvqhhl@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmzolhlv.fsf@waldekranz.com>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:02:52PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 16:03, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:17:30PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> >> > I don't see any place in the network stack that recalculates the FCS if
> >> > NETIF_F_RXALL is set. Additionally, without NETIF_F_RXFCS, I don't even
> >> > know how could the stack even tell a packet with bad FCS apart from one
> >> > with good FCS. If NETIF_F_RXALL is set, then once a packet is received,
> >> > it's taken for granted as good.
> >> 
> >> Right, but there is a difference between a user explicitly enabling it
> >> on a device and us enabling it because we need it internally in the
> >> kernel.
> >> 
> >> In the first scenario, the user can hardly complain as they have
> >> explicitly requested to see all packets on that device. That would not
> >> be true in the second one because there would be no way for the user to
> >> turn it off. It feels like you would end up in a similar situation as
> >> with the user- vs. kernel- promiscuous setting.
> >> 
> >> It seems to me if we enable it, we are responsible for not letting crap
> >> through to the port netdevs.
> >
> > I think there exists an intermediate approach between processing the
> > frames on the RX queue and installing a soft parser.
> >
> > The BMI of FMan RX ports has a configurable pipeline through Next
> > Invoked Actions (NIA). Through the FMBM_RFNE register (Rx Frame Next
> > Engine), it is possible to change the Next Invoked Action from the
> > default value (which is the hardware parser). You can choose to make the
> > Buffer Manager Interface enqueue the packet directly to the Queue
> > Manager Interface (QMI). This will effectively bypass the hardware
> > parser, so DSA frames will never be sent to the error queue if they have
> > an invalid EtherType/Length field.
> >
> > Additionally, frames with a bad FCS should still be discarded, as that
> > is done by the MAC (an earlier stage compared to the BMI).
> 
> Yeah this sounds like the perfect middle ground. I guess that would then
> be activated with an `if (netdev_uses_dsa(dev))`-guard in the driver,
> like how Florian solved it for stmmac? Since it is not quite "rx-all".

I think this would have to be guarded by netdev_uses_dsa for now, yes.
Also, it is far from being a "perfect" middle ground, because if you
disable the hardware parser, you also lose the ability to do frame
classification and hashing/flow steering to multiple RX queues on that
port, I think.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23 10:23 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow dynamic reconfiguration of tag protocol Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-23 11:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-23 12:32   ` Andrew Lunn
2021-03-23 14:48   ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-23 16:30     ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-23 19:03     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-23 21:17       ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-23 23:15         ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-24 10:52           ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-24 11:34             ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-24 13:01               ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-24 13:24                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-24 14:03         ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-24 14:10           ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-24 15:02           ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-24 15:08             ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-03-24 16:07               ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-25  1:34                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-25  8:04                   ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-23 12:41 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-03-23 14:49   ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-23 16:53     ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-23 20:50       ` Tobias Waldekranz
2021-03-24  0:44     ` Andrew Lunn
2021-03-24 12:53       ` Tobias Waldekranz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210324150807.f2amekt2jdcvqhhl@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.