* [PATCH v11] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs.
The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine.
From v8 to v9, there are three more modifications.
1. Based on patchset[1], align binding with scmi for performance domain.
2. Add the CPUFREQ fast switch function support and define DVFS latency.
3. Based on patchser[2], add energy model API parameter for mW.
From v7 to v8, there are three more patches based on patchset v8[3].
This patchset is about to register power table to Energy model for EAS and thermal usage.
1. EM CPU power table
- Register energy model table for EAS and thermal cooling device usage.
- Read the coresponding LUT for power table.
2. SVS initialization
- The SVS(Smart Voltage Scaling) engine is a hardware which is
used to calculate optimized voltage values for CPU power domain.
DVFS driver could apply those optimized voltage values to reduce power consumption.
- Driver will polling if HW engine is done for SVS initialization.
After that, driver will read power table and register it to EAS.
- CPUs must be in power on state when doing SVS. Use pm_qos to block cpu-idle state for SVS initializing.
3. Cooling device flag
- Add cooling device flag for thermal
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201116181356.804590-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c250d50fe2ce627ca9805d9c8ac11cbbf922a4a6
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/23/384
Hector.Yuan (2):
cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 +++++++
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 +
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 510 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs.
The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine.
From v8 to v9, there are three more modifications.
1. Based on patchset[1], align binding with scmi for performance domain.
2. Add the CPUFREQ fast switch function support and define DVFS latency.
3. Based on patchser[2], add energy model API parameter for mW.
From v7 to v8, there are three more patches based on patchset v8[3].
This patchset is about to register power table to Energy model for EAS and thermal usage.
1. EM CPU power table
- Register energy model table for EAS and thermal cooling device usage.
- Read the coresponding LUT for power table.
2. SVS initialization
- The SVS(Smart Voltage Scaling) engine is a hardware which is
used to calculate optimized voltage values for CPU power domain.
DVFS driver could apply those optimized voltage values to reduce power consumption.
- Driver will polling if HW engine is done for SVS initialization.
After that, driver will read power table and register it to EAS.
- CPUs must be in power on state when doing SVS. Use pm_qos to block cpu-idle state for SVS initializing.
3. Cooling device flag
- Add cooling device flag for thermal
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201116181356.804590-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c250d50fe2ce627ca9805d9c8ac11cbbf922a4a6
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/23/384
Hector.Yuan (2):
cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 +++++++
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 +
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 510 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
The CPUfreq HW present in some Mediatek chipsets offloads the steps necessary for changing the frequency of CPUs.
The driver implements the cpufreq driver interface for this hardware engine.
From v8 to v9, there are three more modifications.
1. Based on patchset[1], align binding with scmi for performance domain.
2. Add the CPUFREQ fast switch function support and define DVFS latency.
3. Based on patchser[2], add energy model API parameter for mW.
From v7 to v8, there are three more patches based on patchset v8[3].
This patchset is about to register power table to Energy model for EAS and thermal usage.
1. EM CPU power table
- Register energy model table for EAS and thermal cooling device usage.
- Read the coresponding LUT for power table.
2. SVS initialization
- The SVS(Smart Voltage Scaling) engine is a hardware which is
used to calculate optimized voltage values for CPU power domain.
DVFS driver could apply those optimized voltage values to reduce power consumption.
- Driver will polling if HW engine is done for SVS initialization.
After that, driver will read power table and register it to EAS.
- CPUs must be in power on state when doing SVS. Use pm_qos to block cpu-idle state for SVS initializing.
3. Cooling device flag
- Add cooling device flag for thermal
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201116181356.804590-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c250d50fe2ce627ca9805d9c8ac11cbbf922a4a6
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/23/384
Hector.Yuan (2):
cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 +++++++
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 +
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 510 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
(?)
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add cpufreq HW support.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 ++
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index e65e0a4..1b950a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for MediaTek SoCs.
+config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW
+ tristate "MediaTek CPUFreq HW driver"
+ depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
+ default m
+ help
+ Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
+ Some MediaTek chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
+ necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
+ in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
+ The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
+ Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
+
config ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ
bool "TI OMAP2+"
depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 27d3bd7..48ee585 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT) += imx-cpufreq-dt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUFREQ) += kirkwood-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ) += mediatek-cpufreq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW) += mediatek-cpufreq-hw.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MVEBU_V7) += mvebu-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ) += pxa2xx-cpufreq.o
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f3a461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -0,0 +1,370 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/energy_model.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 32U
+#define LUT_FREQ GENMASK(11, 0)
+#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 0x4
+#define CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS BIT(0)
+#define SVS_HW_STATUS BIT(1)
+#define POLL_USEC 1000
+#define TIMEOUT_USEC 300000
+
+enum {
+ REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_ENABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE,
+ REG_FREQ_HW_STATE,
+ REG_EM_POWER_TBL,
+ REG_FREQ_LATENCY,
+
+ REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
+};
+
+struct cpufreq_mtk {
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ void __iomem *reg_bases[REG_ARRAY_SIZE];
+ int nr_opp;
+ cpumask_t related_cpus;
+};
+
+static const u16 cpufreq_mtk_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
+ [REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE] = 0x0,
+ [REG_FREQ_ENABLE] = 0x84,
+ [REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE] = 0x88,
+ [REG_FREQ_HW_STATE] = 0x8c,
+ [REG_EM_POWER_TBL] = 0x90,
+ [REG_FREQ_LATENCY] = 0x110,
+};
+
+static struct cpufreq_mtk *mtk_freq_domain_map[NR_CPUS];
+
+static int __maybe_unused
+mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW,
+ unsigned long *KHz, struct device *cpu_dev)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu_dev->id];
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < c->nr_opp; i++) {
+ if (c->table[i].frequency < *KHz)
+ break;
+ }
+ i--;
+
+ *KHz = c->table[i].frequency;
+ *mW = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_EM_POWER_TBL] +
+ i * LUT_ROW_SIZE) / 1000;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu];
+
+ index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+ index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
+
+ return c->table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *cpu_dev;
+ struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power);
+ struct pm_qos_request *qos_request;
+ int sig, pwr_hw = CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS | SVS_HW_STATUS;
+ unsigned int latency;
+
+ qos_request = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos_request), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!qos_request)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+ if (!cpu_dev) {
+ pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &c->related_cpus);
+
+ policy->freq_table = c->table;
+ policy->driver_data = c;
+
+ latency = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LATENCY]);
+ if (!latency)
+ latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+
+ /* us convert to ns */
+ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency * 1000;
+
+ policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
+
+ /* Let CPUs leave idle-off state for SVS CPU initializing */
+ cpu_latency_qos_add_request(qos_request, 0);
+
+ /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ if (readl_poll_timeout(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_HW_STATE], sig,
+ (sig & pwr_hw) == pwr_hw, POLL_USEC,
+ TIMEOUT_USEC)) {
+ if (!(sig & CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS)) {
+ pr_info("cpufreq hardware of CPU%d is not enabled\n",
+ policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("SVS of CPU%d is not enabled\n", policy->cpu);
+ }
+
+ em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, c->nr_opp, &em_cb, policy->cpus, true);
+
+ cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(qos_request);
+ kfree(qos_request);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* HW should be in paused state now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
+ CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV,
+ .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
+ .target_index = mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index,
+ .get = mtk_cpufreq_hw_get,
+ .init = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init,
+ .exit = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit,
+ .fast_switch = mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch,
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
+};
+
+static int mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *base_table;
+ u32 data, i, freq, prev_freq = 0;
+
+ c->table = devm_kcalloc(dev, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1,
+ sizeof(*c->table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c->table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base_table = c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
+ data = readl_relaxed(base_table + (i * LUT_ROW_SIZE));
+ freq = FIELD_GET(LUT_FREQ, data) * 1000;
+
+ if (freq == prev_freq)
+ break;
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = freq;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d\n",
+ i, c->table[i].frequency);
+
+ prev_freq = freq;
+ }
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+ c->nr_opp = i;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ int cpu, ret;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ of_node_put(cpu_np);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ if (index == args.args[0]) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);
+ mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ unsigned int cpu, int index,
+ const u16 *offsets)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int ret, i;
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ if (mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu])
+ return 0;
+
+ c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, index);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ for (i = REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
+ c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
+
+ ret = mtk_get_related_cpus(index, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(pdev, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to create freq table\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ const u16 *offsets;
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ int ret;
+
+ offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!offsets)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get cpu %d device\n",
+ cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Get the bases of cpufreq for domains */
+ ret = mtk_cpu_resources_init(pdev, cpu, args.args[0], offsets);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq resource init failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ return cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw", .data = &cpufreq_mtk_offsets },
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver = {
+ .probe = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe,
+ .remove = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .of_match_table = mtk_cpufreq_hw_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek cpufreq-hw driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add cpufreq HW support.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 ++
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index e65e0a4..1b950a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for MediaTek SoCs.
+config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW
+ tristate "MediaTek CPUFreq HW driver"
+ depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
+ default m
+ help
+ Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
+ Some MediaTek chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
+ necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
+ in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
+ The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
+ Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
+
config ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ
bool "TI OMAP2+"
depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 27d3bd7..48ee585 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT) += imx-cpufreq-dt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUFREQ) += kirkwood-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ) += mediatek-cpufreq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW) += mediatek-cpufreq-hw.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MVEBU_V7) += mvebu-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ) += pxa2xx-cpufreq.o
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f3a461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -0,0 +1,370 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/energy_model.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 32U
+#define LUT_FREQ GENMASK(11, 0)
+#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 0x4
+#define CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS BIT(0)
+#define SVS_HW_STATUS BIT(1)
+#define POLL_USEC 1000
+#define TIMEOUT_USEC 300000
+
+enum {
+ REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_ENABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE,
+ REG_FREQ_HW_STATE,
+ REG_EM_POWER_TBL,
+ REG_FREQ_LATENCY,
+
+ REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
+};
+
+struct cpufreq_mtk {
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ void __iomem *reg_bases[REG_ARRAY_SIZE];
+ int nr_opp;
+ cpumask_t related_cpus;
+};
+
+static const u16 cpufreq_mtk_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
+ [REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE] = 0x0,
+ [REG_FREQ_ENABLE] = 0x84,
+ [REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE] = 0x88,
+ [REG_FREQ_HW_STATE] = 0x8c,
+ [REG_EM_POWER_TBL] = 0x90,
+ [REG_FREQ_LATENCY] = 0x110,
+};
+
+static struct cpufreq_mtk *mtk_freq_domain_map[NR_CPUS];
+
+static int __maybe_unused
+mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW,
+ unsigned long *KHz, struct device *cpu_dev)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu_dev->id];
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < c->nr_opp; i++) {
+ if (c->table[i].frequency < *KHz)
+ break;
+ }
+ i--;
+
+ *KHz = c->table[i].frequency;
+ *mW = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_EM_POWER_TBL] +
+ i * LUT_ROW_SIZE) / 1000;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu];
+
+ index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+ index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
+
+ return c->table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *cpu_dev;
+ struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power);
+ struct pm_qos_request *qos_request;
+ int sig, pwr_hw = CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS | SVS_HW_STATUS;
+ unsigned int latency;
+
+ qos_request = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos_request), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!qos_request)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+ if (!cpu_dev) {
+ pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &c->related_cpus);
+
+ policy->freq_table = c->table;
+ policy->driver_data = c;
+
+ latency = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LATENCY]);
+ if (!latency)
+ latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+
+ /* us convert to ns */
+ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency * 1000;
+
+ policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
+
+ /* Let CPUs leave idle-off state for SVS CPU initializing */
+ cpu_latency_qos_add_request(qos_request, 0);
+
+ /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ if (readl_poll_timeout(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_HW_STATE], sig,
+ (sig & pwr_hw) == pwr_hw, POLL_USEC,
+ TIMEOUT_USEC)) {
+ if (!(sig & CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS)) {
+ pr_info("cpufreq hardware of CPU%d is not enabled\n",
+ policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("SVS of CPU%d is not enabled\n", policy->cpu);
+ }
+
+ em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, c->nr_opp, &em_cb, policy->cpus, true);
+
+ cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(qos_request);
+ kfree(qos_request);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* HW should be in paused state now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
+ CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV,
+ .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
+ .target_index = mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index,
+ .get = mtk_cpufreq_hw_get,
+ .init = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init,
+ .exit = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit,
+ .fast_switch = mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch,
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
+};
+
+static int mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *base_table;
+ u32 data, i, freq, prev_freq = 0;
+
+ c->table = devm_kcalloc(dev, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1,
+ sizeof(*c->table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c->table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base_table = c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
+ data = readl_relaxed(base_table + (i * LUT_ROW_SIZE));
+ freq = FIELD_GET(LUT_FREQ, data) * 1000;
+
+ if (freq == prev_freq)
+ break;
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = freq;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d\n",
+ i, c->table[i].frequency);
+
+ prev_freq = freq;
+ }
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+ c->nr_opp = i;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ int cpu, ret;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ of_node_put(cpu_np);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ if (index == args.args[0]) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);
+ mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ unsigned int cpu, int index,
+ const u16 *offsets)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int ret, i;
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ if (mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu])
+ return 0;
+
+ c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, index);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ for (i = REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
+ c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
+
+ ret = mtk_get_related_cpus(index, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(pdev, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to create freq table\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ const u16 *offsets;
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ int ret;
+
+ offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!offsets)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get cpu %d device\n",
+ cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Get the bases of cpufreq for domains */
+ ret = mtk_cpu_resources_init(pdev, cpu, args.args[0], offsets);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq resource init failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ return cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw", .data = &cpufreq_mtk_offsets },
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver = {
+ .probe = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe,
+ .remove = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .of_match_table = mtk_cpufreq_hw_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek cpufreq-hw driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add cpufreq HW support.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 12 ++
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 370 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index e65e0a4..1b950a8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for MediaTek SoCs.
+config ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW
+ tristate "MediaTek CPUFreq HW driver"
+ depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
+ default m
+ help
+ Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
+ Some MediaTek chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
+ necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
+ in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
+ The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
+ Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
+
config ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ
bool "TI OMAP2+"
depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index 27d3bd7..48ee585 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT) += imx-cpufreq-dt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_KIRKWOOD_CPUFREQ) += kirkwood-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ) += mediatek-cpufreq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_MEDIATEK_CPUFREQ_HW) += mediatek-cpufreq-hw.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MVEBU_V7) += mvebu-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ) += omap-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ) += pxa2xx-cpufreq.o
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f3a461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -0,0 +1,370 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 MediaTek Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/energy_model.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 32U
+#define LUT_FREQ GENMASK(11, 0)
+#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 0x4
+#define CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS BIT(0)
+#define SVS_HW_STATUS BIT(1)
+#define POLL_USEC 1000
+#define TIMEOUT_USEC 300000
+
+enum {
+ REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_ENABLE,
+ REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE,
+ REG_FREQ_HW_STATE,
+ REG_EM_POWER_TBL,
+ REG_FREQ_LATENCY,
+
+ REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
+};
+
+struct cpufreq_mtk {
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ void __iomem *reg_bases[REG_ARRAY_SIZE];
+ int nr_opp;
+ cpumask_t related_cpus;
+};
+
+static const u16 cpufreq_mtk_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
+ [REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE] = 0x0,
+ [REG_FREQ_ENABLE] = 0x84,
+ [REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE] = 0x88,
+ [REG_FREQ_HW_STATE] = 0x8c,
+ [REG_EM_POWER_TBL] = 0x90,
+ [REG_FREQ_LATENCY] = 0x110,
+};
+
+static struct cpufreq_mtk *mtk_freq_domain_map[NR_CPUS];
+
+static int __maybe_unused
+mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW,
+ unsigned long *KHz, struct device *cpu_dev)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu_dev->id];
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < c->nr_opp; i++) {
+ if (c->table[i].frequency < *KHz)
+ break;
+ }
+ i--;
+
+ *KHz = c->table[i].frequency;
+ *mW = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_EM_POWER_TBL] +
+ i * LUT_ROW_SIZE) / 1000;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int index)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu];
+
+ index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+ index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
+
+ return c->table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int target_freq)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
+
+ writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
+
+ return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *cpu_dev;
+ struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power);
+ struct pm_qos_request *qos_request;
+ int sig, pwr_hw = CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS | SVS_HW_STATUS;
+ unsigned int latency;
+
+ qos_request = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos_request), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!qos_request)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+ if (!cpu_dev) {
+ pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &c->related_cpus);
+
+ policy->freq_table = c->table;
+ policy->driver_data = c;
+
+ latency = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LATENCY]);
+ if (!latency)
+ latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
+
+ /* us convert to ns */
+ policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency * 1000;
+
+ policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
+
+ /* Let CPUs leave idle-off state for SVS CPU initializing */
+ cpu_latency_qos_add_request(qos_request, 0);
+
+ /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ if (readl_poll_timeout(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_HW_STATE], sig,
+ (sig & pwr_hw) == pwr_hw, POLL_USEC,
+ TIMEOUT_USEC)) {
+ if (!(sig & CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS)) {
+ pr_info("cpufreq hardware of CPU%d is not enabled\n",
+ policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("SVS of CPU%d is not enabled\n", policy->cpu);
+ }
+
+ em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, c->nr_opp, &em_cb, policy->cpus, true);
+
+ cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(qos_request);
+ kfree(qos_request);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+
+ c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
+ if (!c) {
+ pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* HW should be in paused state now */
+ writel_relaxed(0x0, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver = {
+ .flags = CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
+ CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV,
+ .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
+ .target_index = mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index,
+ .get = mtk_cpufreq_hw_get,
+ .init = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init,
+ .exit = mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_exit,
+ .fast_switch = mtk_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch,
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
+};
+
+static int mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ void __iomem *base_table;
+ u32 data, i, freq, prev_freq = 0;
+
+ c->table = devm_kcalloc(dev, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1,
+ sizeof(*c->table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c->table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base_table = c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
+ data = readl_relaxed(base_table + (i * LUT_ROW_SIZE));
+ freq = FIELD_GET(LUT_FREQ, data) * 1000;
+
+ if (freq == prev_freq)
+ break;
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = freq;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "index=%d freq=%d\n",
+ i, c->table[i].frequency);
+
+ prev_freq = freq;
+ }
+
+ c->table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+ c->nr_opp = i;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ int cpu, ret;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ of_node_put(cpu_np);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ if (index == args.args[0]) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);
+ mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ unsigned int cpu, int index,
+ const u16 *offsets)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ int ret, i;
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ if (mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu])
+ return 0;
+
+ c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, index);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ for (i = REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
+ c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
+
+ ret = mtk_get_related_cpus(index, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to get related CPUs\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = mtk_cpu_create_freq_table(pdev, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d failed to create freq table\n", index);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device_node *cpu_np;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ const u16 *offsets;
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ int ret;
+
+ offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!offsets)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ cpu_np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+ if (!cpu_np) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get cpu %d device\n",
+ cpu);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(cpu_np, "performance-domains",
+ "#performance-domain-cells", 0,
+ &args);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Get the bases of cpufreq for domains */
+ ret = mtk_cpu_resources_init(pdev, cpu, args.args[0], offsets);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq resource init failed\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ return cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cpufreq_mtk_hw_driver);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw", .data = &cpufreq_mtk_offsets },
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver = {
+ .probe = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe,
+ .remove = mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "mtk-cpufreq-hw",
+ .of_match_table = mtk_cpufreq_hw_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_cpufreq_hw_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek cpufreq-hw driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
(?)
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0f3ad47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
+
+description:
+ CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
+ SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
+ for multiple clusters.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
+
+ reg:
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
+ description: |
+ Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
+ HW bases in each frequency domain.
+
+ "#performance-domain-cells":
+ description:
+ Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
+ representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
+ multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
+ any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
+ provider.
+ enum: [ 0, 1 ]
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - "#performance-domain-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ cpu0: cpu@0 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x000>;
+ };
+
+ cpu1: cpu@100 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x100>;
+ };
+
+ cpu2: cpu@200 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x200>;
+ };
+
+ cpu3: cpu@300 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x300>;
+ };
+
+ cpu4: cpu@400 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x400>;
+ };
+
+ cpu5: cpu@500 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x500>;
+ };
+
+ cpu6: cpu@600 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x600>;
+ };
+
+ cpu7: cpu@700 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x700>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* ... */
+
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
+ reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
+
+ #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
+ };
+ };
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0f3ad47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
+
+description:
+ CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
+ SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
+ for multiple clusters.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
+
+ reg:
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
+ description: |
+ Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
+ HW bases in each frequency domain.
+
+ "#performance-domain-cells":
+ description:
+ Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
+ representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
+ multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
+ any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
+ provider.
+ enum: [ 0, 1 ]
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - "#performance-domain-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ cpu0: cpu@0 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x000>;
+ };
+
+ cpu1: cpu@100 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x100>;
+ };
+
+ cpu2: cpu@200 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x200>;
+ };
+
+ cpu3: cpu@300 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x300>;
+ };
+
+ cpu4: cpu@400 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x400>;
+ };
+
+ cpu5: cpu@500 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x500>;
+ };
+
+ cpu6: cpu@600 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x600>;
+ };
+
+ cpu7: cpu@700 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x700>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* ... */
+
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
+ reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
+
+ #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
+ };
+ };
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hector Yuan @ 2021-03-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, Rob Herring, devicetree,
linux-kernel
Cc: wsd_upstream, hector.yuan
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
---
.../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0f3ad47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
+
+description:
+ CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
+ SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
+ for multiple clusters.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
+
+ reg:
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
+ description: |
+ Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
+ HW bases in each frequency domain.
+
+ "#performance-domain-cells":
+ description:
+ Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
+ representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
+ multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
+ any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
+ provider.
+ enum: [ 0, 1 ]
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - "#performance-domain-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ cpus {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ cpu0: cpu@0 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x000>;
+ };
+
+ cpu1: cpu@100 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x100>;
+ };
+
+ cpu2: cpu@200 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x200>;
+ };
+
+ cpu3: cpu@300 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
+ reg = <0x300>;
+ };
+
+ cpu4: cpu@400 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x400>;
+ };
+
+ cpu5: cpu@500 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x500>;
+ };
+
+ cpu6: cpu@600 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x600>;
+ };
+
+ cpu7: cpu@700 {
+ device_type = "cpu";
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
+ enable-method = "psci";
+ performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
+ reg = <0x700>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ /* ... */
+
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
+ reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
+
+ #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
+ };
+ };
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
(?)
@ 2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-03-24 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hector Yuan
Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, devicetree, linux-kernel,
wsd_upstream
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
>
> Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0f3ad47
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description:
> + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> + for multiple clusters.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> + description: |
> + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> +
> + "#performance-domain-cells":
A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
first.
> + description:
> + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
> + representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
> + multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
> + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
> + provider.
> + enum: [ 0, 1 ]
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#performance-domain-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu0: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x000>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu1: cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu2: cpu@200 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x200>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu3: cpu@300 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x300>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu4: cpu@400 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
Seems a bit odd that a55 and a75 share a perf domain?
> + reg = <0x400>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu5: cpu@500 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x500>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu6: cpu@600 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x600>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu7: cpu@700 {
Do we really need to show 8 cores to show how to use this binding?
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x700>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + /* ... */
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
> + reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
> +
> + #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-03-24 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hector Yuan
Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, devicetree, linux-kernel,
wsd_upstream
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
>
> Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0f3ad47
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description:
> + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> + for multiple clusters.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> + description: |
> + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> +
> + "#performance-domain-cells":
A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
first.
> + description:
> + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
> + representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
> + multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
> + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
> + provider.
> + enum: [ 0, 1 ]
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#performance-domain-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu0: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x000>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu1: cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu2: cpu@200 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x200>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu3: cpu@300 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x300>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu4: cpu@400 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
Seems a bit odd that a55 and a75 share a perf domain?
> + reg = <0x400>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu5: cpu@500 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x500>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu6: cpu@600 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x600>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu7: cpu@700 {
Do we really need to show 8 cores to show how to use this binding?
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x700>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + /* ... */
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
> + reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
> +
> + #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-03-24 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hector Yuan
Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Matthias Brugger, devicetree, linux-kernel,
wsd_upstream
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
>
> Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0f3ad47
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description:
> + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> + for multiple clusters.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
> + description: |
> + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> +
> + "#performance-domain-cells":
A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
first.
> + description:
> + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
> + representing a single performance domain and 1 for nodes providing
> + multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers), but can be
> + any value as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular
> + provider.
> + enum: [ 0, 1 ]
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#performance-domain-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu0: cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x000>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu1: cpu@100 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu2: cpu@200 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x200>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu3: cpu@300 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 0>;
> + reg = <0x300>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu4: cpu@400 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
Seems a bit odd that a55 and a75 share a perf domain?
> + reg = <0x400>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu5: cpu@500 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x500>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu6: cpu@600 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x600>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu7: cpu@700 {
Do we really need to show 8 cores to show how to use this binding?
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a75";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + performance-domains = <&performance 1>;
> + reg = <0x700>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + /* ... */
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + performance: performance-controller@11bc00 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,cpufreq-hw";
> + reg = <0 0x0011bc10 0 0x120>, <0 0x0011bd30 0 0x120>;
> +
> + #performance-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
@ 2021-03-30 2:56 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-03-30 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring,
Cc: Hector Yuan, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Matthias Brugger, devicetree, linux-kernel,
wsd_upstream
On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > + for multiple clusters.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
> > + description: |
> > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > +
> > + "#performance-domain-cells":
>
> A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
> first.
Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
somehow ?
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-30 2:56 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2021-03-30 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring,
Cc: Hector Yuan, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Matthias Brugger, devicetree, linux-kernel,
wsd_upstream
On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > + for multiple clusters.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
> > + description: |
> > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > +
> > + "#performance-domain-cells":
>
> A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
> first.
Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
somehow ?
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
2021-03-30 2:56 ` Viresh Kumar
(?)
@ 2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2021-03-30 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Rob Herring, Sudeep.Holla, Hector Yuan, linux-mediatek,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, Matthias Brugger,
devicetree, linux-kernel, wsd_upstream
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:26:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > > + for multiple clusters.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > > +
> > > + reg:
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> > > + description: |
> > > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > > + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > > +
> > > + "#performance-domain-cells":
> >
> > A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
> > first.
>
> Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
> has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
> somehow ?
Sorry, it slipped through the cracks. I posted this as a fix for SCMI which
we fixed it later. This got de-prioritised in my todo list. Sorry for that.
I think main problem I had is to write a proper select statement in YAML
scheme to check the DT nodes when it is present. I couldn't get anything
similar for reference from clocks.
I had "select: false" which I knew was not acceptable as it can't go throw
dt_bindings_check. I am happy if someone wants to pick up and work on that
to push the change or provide suggestions that I can try out. I am unable
to spend more time trying to understand whole YAML schema ATM.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2021-03-30 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Rob Herring, Sudeep.Holla, Hector Yuan, linux-mediatek,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, Matthias Brugger,
devicetree, linux-kernel, wsd_upstream
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:26:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > > + for multiple clusters.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > > +
> > > + reg:
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> > > + description: |
> > > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > > + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > > +
> > > + "#performance-domain-cells":
> >
> > A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
> > first.
>
> Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
> has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
> somehow ?
Sorry, it slipped through the cracks. I posted this as a fix for SCMI which
we fixed it later. This got de-prioritised in my todo list. Sorry for that.
I think main problem I had is to write a proper select statement in YAML
scheme to check the DT nodes when it is present. I couldn't get anything
similar for reference from clocks.
I had "select: false" which I knew was not acceptable as it can't go throw
dt_bindings_check. I am happy if someone wants to pick up and work on that
to push the change or provide suggestions that I can try out. I am unable
to spend more time trying to understand whole YAML schema ATM.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
@ 2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2021-03-30 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Rob Herring, Sudeep.Holla, Hector Yuan, linux-mediatek,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, Matthias Brugger,
devicetree, linux-kernel, wsd_upstream
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:26:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..0f3ad47
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> > > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> > > + for multiple clusters.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> > > +
> > > + reg:
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> > > + description: |
> > > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> > > + HW bases in each frequency domain.
> > > +
> > > + "#performance-domain-cells":
> >
> > A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land
> > first.
>
> Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset
> has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish
> somehow ?
Sorry, it slipped through the cracks. I posted this as a fix for SCMI which
we fixed it later. This got de-prioritised in my todo list. Sorry for that.
I think main problem I had is to write a proper select statement in YAML
scheme to check the DT nodes when it is present. I couldn't get anything
similar for reference from clocks.
I had "select: false" which I knew was not acceptable as it can't go throw
dt_bindings_check. I am happy if someone wants to pick up and work on that
to push the change or provide suggestions that I can try out. I am unable
to spend more time trying to understand whole YAML schema ATM.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-30 10:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-12 11:40 [PATCH v11] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-12 11:40 ` Hector Yuan
2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-24 16:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-30 2:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-03-30 2:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-03-30 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.