All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@rothwell.id.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	shaoyunl <shaoyun.liu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:41:06 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331104106.0bd18bb5@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXtjy4HDzK2y2+3Fb788=OQAv_OQJaw31FRL0pkjLXb4g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:36:57 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 4:16 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> >   9adb125dde69 ("drm/amdgpu: re-enable suspend phase 2 for S0ix")
> >   4021229e32bd ("drm/amdgpu/swsmu: skip gfx cgpg on s0ix suspend")
> >   9bb735abcbd8 ("drm/amdgpu: update comments about s0ix suspend/resume")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> >   e3c1b0712fdb ("drm/amdgpu: Reset the devices in the XGMI hive duirng probe")
> >
> > from the drm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > index 8a5a8ff5d362,0f82c5d21237..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > @@@ -2743,16 -2712,15 +2720,25 @@@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_pha
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> >
> >  +              /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
> >  +               * gfx is in gfxoff state, so on resume it will exit gfxoff just
> >  +               * like at runtime. PSP is also part of the always on hardware
> >  +               * so no need to suspend it.
> >  +               */
> >  +              if (adev->in_s0ix &&
> >  +                  (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_PSP ||
> >  +                   adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GFX))
> >  +                      continue;
> >  +
> > +               /* skip unnecessary suspend if we do not initialize them yet */
> > +               if (adev->gmc.xgmi.pending_reset &&
> > +                   !(adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GMC ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH)) {
> > +                       adev->ip_blocks[i].status.hw = false;
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> >                 /* XXX handle errors */
> >                 r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->suspend(adev);
> >                 /* XXX handle errors */  
> 
> The above is not what you have in next-20210329?
> Your tree has a second copy of the first conflict block after the second:
> 
>                 /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
>                 [...]
>                 /* skip unnecessary suspend if we do not initialize them yet */
>                 [...]
>                 /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
> 

It happened because those commits in Linus' tree are also (as different
commits) in the amdgpu tree and so git happily did a new merge
resolution and ended up with what you see :-(  I'll see if I can fix it
up for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@rothwell.id.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	shaoyunl <shaoyun.liu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:41:06 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331104106.0bd18bb5@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXtjy4HDzK2y2+3Fb788=OQAv_OQJaw31FRL0pkjLXb4g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:36:57 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 4:16 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> >   9adb125dde69 ("drm/amdgpu: re-enable suspend phase 2 for S0ix")
> >   4021229e32bd ("drm/amdgpu/swsmu: skip gfx cgpg on s0ix suspend")
> >   9bb735abcbd8 ("drm/amdgpu: update comments about s0ix suspend/resume")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> >   e3c1b0712fdb ("drm/amdgpu: Reset the devices in the XGMI hive duirng probe")
> >
> > from the drm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > index 8a5a8ff5d362,0f82c5d21237..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > @@@ -2743,16 -2712,15 +2720,25 @@@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_pha
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> >
> >  +              /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
> >  +               * gfx is in gfxoff state, so on resume it will exit gfxoff just
> >  +               * like at runtime. PSP is also part of the always on hardware
> >  +               * so no need to suspend it.
> >  +               */
> >  +              if (adev->in_s0ix &&
> >  +                  (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_PSP ||
> >  +                   adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GFX))
> >  +                      continue;
> >  +
> > +               /* skip unnecessary suspend if we do not initialize them yet */
> > +               if (adev->gmc.xgmi.pending_reset &&
> > +                   !(adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GMC ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON ||
> > +                     adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH)) {
> > +                       adev->ip_blocks[i].status.hw = false;
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> >                 /* XXX handle errors */
> >                 r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->suspend(adev);
> >                 /* XXX handle errors */  
> 
> The above is not what you have in next-20210329?
> Your tree has a second copy of the first conflict block after the second:
> 
>                 /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
>                 [...]
>                 /* skip unnecessary suspend if we do not initialize them yet */
>                 [...]
>                 /* skip suspend of gfx and psp for S0ix
> 

It happened because those commits in Linus' tree are also (as different
commits) in the amdgpu tree and so git happily did a new merge
resolution and ended up with what you see :-(  I'll see if I can fix it
up for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 179+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29  2:14 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29  2:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-30  7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-30  7:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-30 23:41   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-03-30 23:41     ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-04  1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-04  0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08  0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08  0:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-19  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-19  1:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-30 22:57 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-30 22:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-27 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-27 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-29  9:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-29  9:07   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-17  2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-17  2:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19  0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19  7:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-19  7:58   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-19 14:23   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-19 14:23     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-02-28  3:17 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-28  3:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-29  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-29  6:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-11  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23  2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-24  0:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-12  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-01  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-01  0:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-01  1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-01  1:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 22:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 22:07   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18  0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-02  3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-02  3:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-25  3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-25  3:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-23  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-23  0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  1:38 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  1:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  1:13 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  1:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:40 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13  0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-26  3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-26  3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-11  2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26  3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26  3:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22  6:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26  3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-13  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-13  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-18 23:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-18 23:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-20 20:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-02-20 20:15   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-02-18 23:02 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-18 23:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-15  1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-23 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-10-30 18:36 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 18:26 Mark Brown
2017-08-28  2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-31  2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-24  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-24  2:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-05  2:49 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-05  0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-23 23:17 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-20  2:42 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-20 12:25 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-09-05  3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-05  3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-29  1:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-09  1:28 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-09  1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-17  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-17  1:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-29  2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-07  3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01  8:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-27  1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-21  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-22  7:20 ` Christian König
2015-06-22  7:20   ` Christian König
2015-05-11  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-07  5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-29  2:17 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-29  8:19 ` Oded Gabbay
2015-01-29  8:19   ` Oded Gabbay
2015-01-22  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-22  2:31 ` Dave Airlie
2015-01-22  2:57   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-22  2:18 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-22  2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-05  4:46 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-05  4:39 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  9:47 ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-17  9:47   ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-05  3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-05  3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-31  2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-24  2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-24  8:49 ` Jani Nikula
2013-12-19  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-19  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-07  2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-07  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-29  2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-26  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-24  2:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-13  4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-30  1:22 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-04  2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-04  1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-17  4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-24  2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-24  2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-24  7:13 ` Jani Nikula
2012-08-24  7:12   ` Dave Airlie
2012-08-24 20:29     ` Sedat Dilek
2012-07-19  1:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-16  3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-29  3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-29  9:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-14  4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07  3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07  8:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-03  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-13  3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-04-13  8:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-03-05  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-28  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-28  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-21  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-12  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-09  3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-15  1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-03 23:30 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-03 23:30 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-28  3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-12  5:06 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06  2:28 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-08  2:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-08  3:38   ` Dave Airlie
2009-10-08  3:44     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-08  5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-20  5:27 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-20  5:30 ` Dave Airlie
2009-08-20  6:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-20  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-05  3:44 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-10  6:22 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210331104106.0bd18bb5@elm.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=sfr@rothwell.id.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shaoyun.liu@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.