From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/8] KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:05:08 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210405160515.269020-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw) From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> [ Upstream commit 1d676673d665fd2162e7e466dcfbe5373bfdb73e ] Currently we advertise the ID_AA6DFR0_EL1.TRACEVER for the guest, when the trace register accesses are trapped (CPTR_EL2.TTA == 1). So, the guest will get an undefined instruction, if trusts the ID registers and access one of the trace registers. Lets be nice to the guest and hide the feature to avoid unexpected behavior. Even though this can be done at KVM sysreg emulation layer, we do this by removing the TRACEVER from the sanitised feature register field. This is fine as long as the ETM drivers can handle the individual trace units separately, even when there are differences among the CPUs. Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323120647.454211-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 1719d21a171a..122d5e843ab6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = { * of support. */ S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_TRACEVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER_SHIFT, 4, 0x6), ARM64_FTR_END, }; -- 2.30.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/8] KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:05:08 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210405160515.269020-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw) From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> [ Upstream commit 1d676673d665fd2162e7e466dcfbe5373bfdb73e ] Currently we advertise the ID_AA6DFR0_EL1.TRACEVER for the guest, when the trace register accesses are trapped (CPTR_EL2.TTA == 1). So, the guest will get an undefined instruction, if trusts the ID registers and access one of the trace registers. Lets be nice to the guest and hide the feature to avoid unexpected behavior. Even though this can be done at KVM sysreg emulation layer, we do this by removing the TRACEVER from the sanitised feature register field. This is fine as long as the ETM drivers can handle the individual trace units separately, even when there are differences among the CPUs. Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323120647.454211-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 1719d21a171a..122d5e843ab6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = { * of support. */ S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_TRACEVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER_SHIFT, 4, 0x6), ARM64_FTR_END, }; -- 2.30.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-05 16:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-05 16:05 Sasha Levin [this message] 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/8] KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/8] KVM: arm64: Disable guest access to trace filter controls Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/8] drm/imx: imx-ldb: fix out of bounds array access warning Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 4/8] gfs2: report "already frozen/thawed" errors Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [Cluster-devel] " Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 5/8] drm/tegra: dc: Don't set PLL clock to 0Hz Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 6/8] radix tree test suite: Fix compilation Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 18:11 ` Matthew Wilcox 2021-04-14 12:18 ` Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 7/8] block: only update parent bi_status when bio fail Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 8/8] riscv,entry: fix misaligned base for excp_vect_table Sasha Levin 2021-04-05 16:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 8/8] riscv, entry: " Sasha Levin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210405160515.269020-1-sashal@kernel.org \ --to=sashal@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.