All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
	Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: avoid retrigger_next_event IPI
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:51:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409165146.GA40118@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8en4k9a.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>


+CC Anna-Maria.

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 04:15:13PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07 2021 at 10:53, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Setting the realtime clock triggers an IPI to all CPUs to reprogram
> > hrtimers.
> >
> > However, only base, boottime and tai clocks have their offsets updated
> 
> base clock? 

Heh...

> And why boottime? Boottime is not affected by a clock
> realtime set. It's clock REALTIME and TAI, nothing else.

OK!

> > +#define CLOCK_SET_BASES ((1U << HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME)|		\
> > +			 (1U << HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME_SOFT)|	\
> > +			 (1U << HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME)|		\
> > +			 (1U << HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME_SOFT)|	\
> > +			 (1U << HRTIMER_BASE_TAI)|		\
> > +			 (1U << HRTIMER_BASE_TAI_SOFT))
> > +
> > +static bool need_reprogram_timer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int active = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!cpu_base->softirq_activated)
> > +		active = cpu_base->active_bases & HRTIMER_ACTIVE_SOFT;

Again, if (cpu_base->softirq_activated), need to IPI (will resend).

> > +	active = active | (cpu_base->active_bases & HRTIMER_ACTIVE_HARD);
> > +
> > +	if ((active & CLOCK_SET_BASES) == 0)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> 
> Errm. 

What?

> > +	/* Avoid interrupting nohz_full CPUs if possible */
> > +	preempt_disable();
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) {
> > +			unsigned long flags;
> > +			struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = &per_cpu(hrtimer_bases, cpu);
> > +
> > +			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> > +			if (need_reprogram_timer(cpu_base))
> > +				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
> > +			else
> > +				hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
> > +			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> 
> How is that supposed to be correct?
> 
> CPU0                    	CPU1
> 
> clock_was_set()                 hrtimer_start(CLOCK_REALTIME)
> 
>   if (!active_mask[CPU1] & XXX)
>   	continue;
>                                 active_mask |= REALTIME;
> 
> ---> fail because that newly started timer is on the old offset.

CPU0								CPU1


clock_was_set()
							Case-1: CPU-1 grabs base->lock before CPU-0:
							CPU-0 sees active_mask[CPU1] and IPIs.

							base = lock_hrtimer_base(timer, &flags);
        						if (__hrtimer_start_range_ns(timer, tim, ...
                						hrtimer_reprogram(timer, true);

        						unlock_hrtimer_base(timer, &flags);


raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
if (need_reprogram_timer(cpu_base))
        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
else
        hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags);

							Case-2: CPU-1 grabs base->lock after CPU-0:
							CPU-0 will have updated the offsets remotely.

							base = lock_hrtimer_base(timer, &flags);
        						if (__hrtimer_start_range_ns(timer, tim, ...
                						hrtimer_reprogram(timer, true);

        						unlock_hrtimer_base(timer, &flags);


No?


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 13:53 [PATCH] hrtimer: avoid retrigger_next_event IPI Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-07 19:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-07 19:28   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-07 22:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-08 12:27   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-09 14:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-09 16:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-04-10  7:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-13 17:04       ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-14 17:19         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-15 15:39         ` [PATCH v3] " Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-15 18:59           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-15 20:40             ` [PATCH v4] " Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-16 16:00               ` [PATCH v5] " Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-16 17:13                 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-17 16:24                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-17 16:51                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-19 18:56                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-19 19:39                 ` [PATCH v6] " Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-19 20:52                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-07 18:20 [PATCH] " kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210409165146.GA40118@fuller.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=abelits@marvell.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.