From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+eb4674092e6cc8d9e0bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in gadget_setup
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:57:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210413165724.GD1454681@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YEw4iJPxY4b6LPXrU91TODfu09dG=53exvQkwjPBg23w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:47:47PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:13 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > Hopefully this patch will make the race a lot more likely to occur. Is
> > there any way to tell syzkaller to test it, despite the fact that
> > syzkaller doesn't think it has a reproducer for this issue?
>
> If there is no reproducer the only way syzbot can test it is if it's
> in linux-next under CONFIG_DEBUG_AID_FOR_SYZBOT:
> http://bit.do/syzbot#no-custom-patches
There _is_ a theoretical reproducer: the test that provoked syzkaller's
original bug report. But syzkaller doesn't realize that it is (or may
be) a reproducer.
It ought to be possible to ask syzkaller to run a particular test that
it has done before, with a patch applied -- and without having to add
anything to linux-next.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 8:08 [syzbot] general protection fault in gadget_setup syzbot
2021-04-13 8:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-04-13 16:13 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-13 16:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-04-13 16:57 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2021-04-13 17:11 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-04-15 20:59 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-16 7:21 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-04-16 15:29 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-16 5:40 ` Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-04-16 15:27 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-16 17:05 ` Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-04-16 17:46 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210413165724.GD1454681@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+eb4674092e6cc8d9e0bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.