All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: prevent ternary sign expansion bug
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422174631.aruiqqqx3szboqdp@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIE7pdqV/h10tEAK@mwanda>

(dropping Tixy as I am sure it will bounce, he left/retired from Linaro
long back)

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:02:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> How type promotion works in ternary expressions is a bit tricky.
> The problem is that scpi_clk_get_val() returns longs, "ret" is a int
> which holds a negative error code, and le32_to_cpu() is an unsigned int.

Agreed.

> We want the negative error code to be cast to a negative long.  But
> because le32_to_cpu() is an u32 then "ret" is type promoted to u32 and
> becomes a high positive and then it is promoted to long and it is still
> a high positive value.
>

Thanks a lot for finding and fixing the bug!

> Fix this by getting rid of the ternary.
>
> Fixes: 8cb7cf56c9fe ("firmware: add support for ARM System Control and Power Interface(SCPI) protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> index d0dee37ad522..3bf61854121d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> @@ -552,8 +552,10 @@ static unsigned long scpi_clk_get_val(u16 clk_id)
>
>  	ret = scpi_send_message(CMD_GET_CLOCK_VALUE, &le_clk_id,
>  				sizeof(le_clk_id), &rate, sizeof(rate));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

This could be still an issue, ideally I would prefer to pass the return
value via argument pointer and always return success/failure as return
value. Can't remember any reason for this. Since this is old interface
with limited platform to test, I think returning 0 as clock rate on error
should be fine as Cristain suggested. If you agree with that, I can
fix up when applying. 

If you don't, we can look at changing the scpi interface to clock driver
which will anyway need to do the same(i.e. send 0 in case of error)

Let me know.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: prevent ternary sign expansion bug
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422174631.aruiqqqx3szboqdp@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIE7pdqV/h10tEAK@mwanda>

(dropping Tixy as I am sure it will bounce, he left/retired from Linaro
long back)

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:02:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> How type promotion works in ternary expressions is a bit tricky.
> The problem is that scpi_clk_get_val() returns longs, "ret" is a int
> which holds a negative error code, and le32_to_cpu() is an unsigned int.

Agreed.

> We want the negative error code to be cast to a negative long.  But
> because le32_to_cpu() is an u32 then "ret" is type promoted to u32 and
> becomes a high positive and then it is promoted to long and it is still
> a high positive value.
>

Thanks a lot for finding and fixing the bug!

> Fix this by getting rid of the ternary.
>
> Fixes: 8cb7cf56c9fe ("firmware: add support for ARM System Control and Power Interface(SCPI) protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> index d0dee37ad522..3bf61854121d 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> @@ -552,8 +552,10 @@ static unsigned long scpi_clk_get_val(u16 clk_id)
>
>  	ret = scpi_send_message(CMD_GET_CLOCK_VALUE, &le_clk_id,
>  				sizeof(le_clk_id), &rate, sizeof(rate));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

This could be still an issue, ideally I would prefer to pass the return
value via argument pointer and always return success/failure as return
value. Can't remember any reason for this. Since this is old interface
with limited platform to test, I think returning 0 as clock rate on error
should be fine as Cristain suggested. If you agree with that, I can
fix up when applying. 

If you don't, we can look at changing the scpi interface to clock driver
which will anyway need to do the same(i.e. send 0 in case of error)

Let me know.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-22  9:02 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scpi: prevent ternary sign expansion bug Dan Carpenter
2021-04-22  9:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-22 10:17 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-04-22 10:17   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-04-22 11:34   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-04-22 11:34     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-04-22 17:46 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2021-04-22 17:46   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-04-24  6:43   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-24  6:43     ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-28 10:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-04-28 10:03   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210422174631.aruiqqqx3szboqdp@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.