All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* asrock rack layer
@ 2021-04-22 12:30 Brad Bishop
  2021-04-22 14:53 ` Ed Tanous
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Bishop @ 2021-04-22 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edtanous, Charlotte_Li, Jeff9_Chan; +Cc: openbmc

Hi Ed

The folks at ASRock Rack are looking to get a layer added to OpenBMC.  
You already started this here:

https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/40463

You mentioned the device tree needs to be upstreamed - is that the only 
remaining work item?

ASRock Rack team - if you have any questions about how to help Ed (or 
even take over the patch) please ask here - we are here to help!

thx - brad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: asrock rack layer
  2021-04-22 12:30 asrock rack layer Brad Bishop
@ 2021-04-22 14:53 ` Ed Tanous
  2021-04-27  3:44   ` Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ed Tanous @ 2021-04-22 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brad Bishop; +Cc: Charlotte_Li, OpenBMC Maillist, Jeff9_Chan

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:30 AM Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ed
>
> The folks at ASRock Rack are looking to get a layer added to OpenBMC.

From a conversation with the asrock support folks it sounded like
there wasn't interest in OpenBMC, so I'm glad to hear I was ill
informed.

> You already started this here:
>
> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/40463
>
> You mentioned the device tree needs to be upstreamed - is that the only
> remaining work item?

The device tree really needs filled out better, which is what I was
stalling on.  I was having some trouble figuring out some of the
device mappings without schematics, so that would probably be the next
work item.

I was also planning on making it entity-manager enabled;  I'm assuming
the Asrock team is ok with that (as opposed to phosphor-hwmon based)?

I also based it on a UBI image, which isn't very standard;  I'm
guessing we'll want to adjust it to use a more common image layout.

>
> ASRock Rack team - if you have any questions about how to help Ed (or
> even take over the patch) please ask here - we are here to help!

Glad to have you guys onboard.

>
> thx - brad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: asrock rack layer
  2021-04-22 14:53 ` Ed Tanous
@ 2021-04-27  3:44   ` Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack)
  2021-04-28  1:24     ` Brad Bishop
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack) @ 2021-04-27  3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ed Tanous, Brad Bishop
  Cc: OpenBMC Maillist, Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)

Hi Ed,

Nice to know you!

It seems X570D4U is not submitted by our team...
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/40463

Just curious, the developers listed in schedule A are Jeff and Leo, can someone else make contribution for ASRock Rack too?

Jeff Chan: Jeff9_Chan@asrockrack.com
Leo Chang: Leo2_Chang@asrockrack.com

Thank you,

Charlotte
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Tanous [mailto:edtanous@google.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 10:54 PM
To: Brad Bishop
Cc: Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack); Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack); OpenBMC Maillist
Subject: Re: asrock rack layer

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:30 AM Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ed
>
> The folks at ASRock Rack are looking to get a layer added to OpenBMC.

From a conversation with the asrock support folks it sounded like
there wasn't interest in OpenBMC, so I'm glad to hear I was ill
informed.

> You already started this here:
>
> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/40463
>
> You mentioned the device tree needs to be upstreamed - is that the only
> remaining work item?

The device tree really needs filled out better, which is what I was
stalling on.  I was having some trouble figuring out some of the
device mappings without schematics, so that would probably be the next
work item.

I was also planning on making it entity-manager enabled;  I'm assuming
the Asrock team is ok with that (as opposed to phosphor-hwmon based)?

I also based it on a UBI image, which isn't very standard;  I'm
guessing we'll want to adjust it to use a more common image layout.

>
> ASRock Rack team - if you have any questions about how to help Ed (or
> even take over the patch) please ask here - we are here to help!

Glad to have you guys onboard.

>
> thx - brad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: asrock rack layer
  2021-04-27  3:44   ` Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack)
@ 2021-04-28  1:24     ` Brad Bishop
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Bishop @ 2021-04-28  1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack)
  Cc: Ed Tanous, OpenBMC Maillist,
	Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 03:44:56AM +0000, Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack) wrote:
>Hi Ed,
>
>Nice to know you!
>
>It seems X570D4U is not submitted by our team...
>https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/40463
>
>Just curious, the developers listed in schedule A are Jeff and Leo, can someone else make contribution for ASRock Rack too?

Hi Charlotte

I can understand the confusion, but meta layers hosted in the OpenBMC 
GitHub organization (github.com/openbmc) are *not* owned by the vendors 
they are named after - they are owned by the entire OpenBMC community.  
So to answer your question - yes, anyone can make a contribution to 
meta-asrockrack.

thx - brad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-28  1:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-22 12:30 asrock rack layer Brad Bishop
2021-04-22 14:53 ` Ed Tanous
2021-04-27  3:44   ` Charlotte Li(李佳俐_ASRockRack)
2021-04-28  1:24     ` Brad Bishop

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.