All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Discard .note.gnu.property sections in vDSO
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:28:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428172847.GC4022@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423205159.830854-1-morbo@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:51:59PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The arm64 assembler in binutils 2.32 and above generates a program
> property note in a note section, .note.gnu.property, to encode used x86
> ISAs and features. But the kernel linker script only contains a single
> NOTE segment:
> 
>   PHDRS
>   {
>     text    PT_LOAD    FLAGS(5) FILEHDR PHDRS; /* PF_R|PF_X */
>     dynamic PT_DYNAMIC FLAGS(4);               /* PF_R */
>     note    PT_NOTE    FLAGS(4);               /* PF_R */
>   }
> 
> The NOTE segment generated by the vDSO linker script is aligned to 4 bytes.
> But the .note.gnu.property section must be aligned to 8 bytes on arm64.
> 
>   $ readelf -n vdso64.so
> 
>   Displaying notes found in: .note
>     Owner                Data size      Description
>     Linux                0x00000004     Unknown note type: (0x00000000)
>      description data: 06 00 00 00
>   readelf: Warning: note with invalid namesz and/or descsz found at offset 0x20
>   readelf: Warning:  type: 0x78, namesize: 0x00000100, descsize: 0x756e694c, alignment: 8
> 
> Since the note.gnu.property section in the vDSO is not checked by the
> dynamic linker, discard the .note.gnu.property sections in the vDSO.
> 
> Similar to commit 4caffe6a28d31 ("x86/vdso: Discard .note.gnu.property
> sections in vDSO"), but for arm64.

Can we not instead fix the linker script to preserve the
.note.gnu.property, correctly aligned? It doesn't take much space and
while we don't use it now, it has the BTI information about the binary.

Cc'ing a few others who were involved in the BTI support.

> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> index 61dbb4c838ef..a5e61e09ea92 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ SECTIONS
>  	.gnu.version_d	: { *(.gnu.version_d) }
>  	.gnu.version_r	: { *(.gnu.version_r) }
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Discard .note.gnu.property sections which are unused and have
> +	 * different alignment requirement from vDSO note sections.
> +	 */
> +	/DISCARD/	: {
> +		*(.note.GNU-stack .note.gnu.property)
> +	}
>  	.note		: { *(.note.*) }		:text	:note
>  
>  	. = ALIGN(16);
> @@ -48,7 +55,6 @@ SECTIONS
>  	PROVIDE(end = .);
>  
>  	/DISCARD/	: {
> -		*(.note.GNU-stack)
>  		*(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.* .sdata*)
>  		*(.bss .sbss .dynbss .dynsbss)
>  		*(.eh_frame .eh_frame_hdr)
> -- 
> 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Discard .note.gnu.property sections in vDSO
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:28:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428172847.GC4022@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423205159.830854-1-morbo@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:51:59PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> The arm64 assembler in binutils 2.32 and above generates a program
> property note in a note section, .note.gnu.property, to encode used x86
> ISAs and features. But the kernel linker script only contains a single
> NOTE segment:
> 
>   PHDRS
>   {
>     text    PT_LOAD    FLAGS(5) FILEHDR PHDRS; /* PF_R|PF_X */
>     dynamic PT_DYNAMIC FLAGS(4);               /* PF_R */
>     note    PT_NOTE    FLAGS(4);               /* PF_R */
>   }
> 
> The NOTE segment generated by the vDSO linker script is aligned to 4 bytes.
> But the .note.gnu.property section must be aligned to 8 bytes on arm64.
> 
>   $ readelf -n vdso64.so
> 
>   Displaying notes found in: .note
>     Owner                Data size      Description
>     Linux                0x00000004     Unknown note type: (0x00000000)
>      description data: 06 00 00 00
>   readelf: Warning: note with invalid namesz and/or descsz found at offset 0x20
>   readelf: Warning:  type: 0x78, namesize: 0x00000100, descsize: 0x756e694c, alignment: 8
> 
> Since the note.gnu.property section in the vDSO is not checked by the
> dynamic linker, discard the .note.gnu.property sections in the vDSO.
> 
> Similar to commit 4caffe6a28d31 ("x86/vdso: Discard .note.gnu.property
> sections in vDSO"), but for arm64.

Can we not instead fix the linker script to preserve the
.note.gnu.property, correctly aligned? It doesn't take much space and
while we don't use it now, it has the BTI information about the binary.

Cc'ing a few others who were involved in the BTI support.

> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> index 61dbb4c838ef..a5e61e09ea92 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ SECTIONS
>  	.gnu.version_d	: { *(.gnu.version_d) }
>  	.gnu.version_r	: { *(.gnu.version_r) }
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Discard .note.gnu.property sections which are unused and have
> +	 * different alignment requirement from vDSO note sections.
> +	 */
> +	/DISCARD/	: {
> +		*(.note.GNU-stack .note.gnu.property)
> +	}
>  	.note		: { *(.note.*) }		:text	:note
>  
>  	. = ALIGN(16);
> @@ -48,7 +55,6 @@ SECTIONS
>  	PROVIDE(end = .);
>  
>  	/DISCARD/	: {
> -		*(.note.GNU-stack)
>  		*(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.* .sdata*)
>  		*(.bss .sbss .dynbss .dynsbss)
>  		*(.eh_frame .eh_frame_hdr)
> -- 
> 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-23 20:51 [PATCH] arm64/vdso: Discard .note.gnu.property sections in vDSO Bill Wendling
2021-04-23 20:51 ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-27 22:58 ` Kees Cook
2021-04-27 22:58   ` Kees Cook
2021-04-28  8:51   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-04-28  8:51     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-04-28 17:28 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-04-28 17:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-28 17:40   ` Mark Brown
2021-04-28 17:40     ` Mark Brown
2021-04-28 19:21     ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-28 19:21       ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-28 19:31       ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-28 19:31         ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-29  7:54         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-29  7:54           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-29  9:23           ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-29  9:23             ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-29  9:50             ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-29  9:50               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-29 18:52               ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-29 18:52                 ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-30  8:16                 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-30  8:16                   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-30  8:29                   ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-30  8:29                     ` Bill Wendling
2021-04-30 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-30 17:57   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210428172847.GC4022@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Daniel.Kiss@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.