All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"wangzhou1@hisilicon.com" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	"vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:57:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513195749.GA801830@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513124621.01421173@jacob-builder>

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:46:21PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> It seems there are two options:
> 1. Add a new IOMMU API to set up a system PASID with a *separate* IOMMU page
> table/domain, mark the device is PASID only with a flag. Use DMA APIs
> to explicit map/unmap. Based on this PASID-only flag, Vendor IOMMU driver
> will decide whether to use system PASID domain during map/unmap. Not clear
> if we also need to make IOVA==kernel VA.
> 
> 2. Add a new IOMMU API to setup a system PASID which points to init_mm.pgd.
> This API only allows trusted device to bind with the system PASID at its
> own risk. There is no need for DMA API. This is the same as the current
> code except with an explicit API.
> 
> Which option?

Option #1 looks cleaner to me. Option #2 gives access to bits
of memory that the users of system PASID shouldn't ever need
to touch ... just map regions of memory that the kernel has
a "struct page" for.

What does "use DMA APIs to explicitly map/unmap" mean? Is that
for the whole region?

I'm expecting that once this system PASID has been initialized,
then any accelerator device with a kernel use case would use the
same PASID. I.e. DSA for page clearing, IAX for ZSwap compression
& decompression, etc.

-Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:57:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513195749.GA801830@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513124621.01421173@jacob-builder>

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:46:21PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> It seems there are two options:
> 1. Add a new IOMMU API to set up a system PASID with a *separate* IOMMU page
> table/domain, mark the device is PASID only with a flag. Use DMA APIs
> to explicit map/unmap. Based on this PASID-only flag, Vendor IOMMU driver
> will decide whether to use system PASID domain during map/unmap. Not clear
> if we also need to make IOVA==kernel VA.
> 
> 2. Add a new IOMMU API to setup a system PASID which points to init_mm.pgd.
> This API only allows trusted device to bind with the system PASID at its
> own risk. There is no need for DMA API. This is the same as the current
> code except with an explicit API.
> 
> Which option?

Option #1 looks cleaner to me. Option #2 gives access to bits
of memory that the users of system PASID shouldn't ever need
to touch ... just map regions of memory that the kernel has
a "struct page" for.

What does "use DMA APIs to explicitly map/unmap" mean? Is that
for the whole region?

I'm expecting that once this system PASID has been initialized,
then any accelerator device with a kernel use case would use the
same PASID. I.e. DSA for page clearing, IAX for ZSwap compression
& decompression, etc.

-Tony
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 13:25 [PATCH v4 0/2] Simplify and restrict IOMMU SVA APIs Jacob Pan
2021-05-10 13:25 ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-10 13:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Jacob Pan
2021-05-10 13:25   ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-10 23:37   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-10 23:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11  3:31     ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11  3:31       ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11 11:48       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11 11:48         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11 16:14         ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11 16:14           ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11 16:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11 16:35             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11 18:05             ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11 18:05               ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-11 19:47               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-11 19:47                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-12  6:37                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-12  6:37                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-13 13:00                   ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 13:00                     ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 13:38                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 13:38                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 15:10                       ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 15:10                         ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 16:44                         ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 16:44                           ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 17:33                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 17:33                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 18:53                             ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 18:53                               ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 19:00                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 19:00                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 19:14                                 ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 19:14                                   ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 19:20                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 19:20                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 19:46                                     ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 19:46                                       ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 19:57                                       ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2021-05-13 19:57                                         ` Luck, Tony
2021-05-13 20:22                                         ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 20:22                                           ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 22:31                                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 22:31                                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 23:40                                             ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-13 23:40                                               ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-17 14:37                                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-17 14:37                                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-19 15:46                                                 ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-19 15:46                                                   ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-12 10:18   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-05-12 10:18     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-05-10 13:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API Jacob Pan
2021-05-10 13:25   ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-12 10:24   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-05-12 10:24     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210513195749.GA801830@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.