From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists allocations
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:29:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210519182941.GQ1002214@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b3cc247-b67b-6151-2a32-e4682ff9af22@cornelisnetworks.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:56:32AM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> Perhaps the code can be enhanced to move more stuff into the driver's own
> structs as Jason points out, but that should happen first. For now I still
> don't understand why the core can't optionally make the allocation per node.
Because I think it is wrong in the general case to assign all
allocations to a single node?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 10:36 [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists allocations Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-11 10:59 ` Haakon Bugge
2021-05-11 12:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-11 19:15 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-11 19:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-11 19:39 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-12 4:08 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-12 12:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-12 12:45 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-11 12:26 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-11 12:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-12 12:25 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-12 12:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-13 19:03 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-13 19:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-13 19:31 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-14 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-14 14:07 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-14 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-14 15:00 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-14 15:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-19 7:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-19 11:56 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-19 18:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-05-19 19:49 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-19 20:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-20 22:02 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-21 6:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-25 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-25 14:10 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-05-25 14:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-25 14:29 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2021-06-28 21:59 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-06-28 23:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-04 6:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-02 4:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-16 10:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-12 12:23 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210519182941.GQ1002214@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.