All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use common helper to lookup svm devices
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:15:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520031531.712333-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520031531.712333-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

It's common to iterate the svm device list and find a matched device. Add
common helpers to do this and consolidate the code.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index da4310686ed3..57867ff97bc2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -48,6 +48,40 @@ static void *pasid_private_find(ioasid_t pasid)
 	return xa_load(&pasid_private_array, pasid);
 }
 
+static struct intel_svm_dev *
+svm_lookup_device_by_sid(struct intel_svm *svm, u16 sid)
+{
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL, *t;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
+		if (t->sid == sid) {
+			sdev = t;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return sdev;
+}
+
+static struct intel_svm_dev *
+svm_lookup_device_by_dev(struct intel_svm *svm, struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL, *t;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
+		if (t->dev == dev) {
+			sdev = t;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return sdev;
+}
+
 int intel_svm_enable_prq(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 {
 	struct page *pages;
@@ -225,15 +259,11 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = {
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
 
-#define for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, d)			\
-	list_for_each_entry((sdev), &(svm)->devs, list)	\
-		if ((d) != (sdev)->dev) {} else
-
 static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 			     struct intel_svm **rsvm,
 			     struct intel_svm_dev **rsdev)
 {
-	struct intel_svm_dev *d, *sdev = NULL;
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL;
 	struct intel_svm *svm;
 
 	/* The caller should hold the pasid_mutex lock */
@@ -256,15 +286,7 @@ static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 	 */
 	if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&svm->devs)))
 		return -EINVAL;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(d, &svm->devs, list) {
-		if (d->dev == dev) {
-			sdev = d;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_dev(svm, dev);
 
 out:
 	*rsvm = svm;
@@ -533,7 +555,8 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	}
 
 	/* Find the matching device in svm list */
-	for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
+	sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_dev(svm, dev);
+	if (sdev) {
 		sdev->users++;
 		goto success;
 	}
@@ -901,19 +924,8 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!sdev || sdev->sid != req->rid) {
-			struct intel_svm_dev *t;
-
-			sdev = NULL;
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
-				if (t->sid == req->rid) {
-					sdev = t;
-					break;
-				}
-			}
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-		}
+		if (!sdev || sdev->sid != req->rid)
+			sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_sid(svm, req->rid);
 
 		/* Since we're using init_mm.pgd directly, we should never take
 		 * any faults on kernel addresses. */
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use common helper to lookup svm devices
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:15:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520031531.712333-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520031531.712333-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

It's common to iterate the svm device list and find a matched device. Add
common helpers to do this and consolidate the code.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index da4310686ed3..57867ff97bc2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -48,6 +48,40 @@ static void *pasid_private_find(ioasid_t pasid)
 	return xa_load(&pasid_private_array, pasid);
 }
 
+static struct intel_svm_dev *
+svm_lookup_device_by_sid(struct intel_svm *svm, u16 sid)
+{
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL, *t;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
+		if (t->sid == sid) {
+			sdev = t;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return sdev;
+}
+
+static struct intel_svm_dev *
+svm_lookup_device_by_dev(struct intel_svm *svm, struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL, *t;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
+		if (t->dev == dev) {
+			sdev = t;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return sdev;
+}
+
 int intel_svm_enable_prq(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 {
 	struct page *pages;
@@ -225,15 +259,11 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = {
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
 
-#define for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, d)			\
-	list_for_each_entry((sdev), &(svm)->devs, list)	\
-		if ((d) != (sdev)->dev) {} else
-
 static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 			     struct intel_svm **rsvm,
 			     struct intel_svm_dev **rsdev)
 {
-	struct intel_svm_dev *d, *sdev = NULL;
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL;
 	struct intel_svm *svm;
 
 	/* The caller should hold the pasid_mutex lock */
@@ -256,15 +286,7 @@ static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 	 */
 	if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&svm->devs)))
 		return -EINVAL;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(d, &svm->devs, list) {
-		if (d->dev == dev) {
-			sdev = d;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_dev(svm, dev);
 
 out:
 	*rsvm = svm;
@@ -533,7 +555,8 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	}
 
 	/* Find the matching device in svm list */
-	for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
+	sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_dev(svm, dev);
+	if (sdev) {
 		sdev->users++;
 		goto success;
 	}
@@ -901,19 +924,8 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (!sdev || sdev->sid != req->rid) {
-			struct intel_svm_dev *t;
-
-			sdev = NULL;
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &svm->devs, list) {
-				if (t->sid == req->rid) {
-					sdev = t;
-					break;
-				}
-			}
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-		}
+		if (!sdev || sdev->sid != req->rid)
+			sdev = svm_lookup_device_by_sid(svm, req->rid);
 
 		/* Since we're using init_mm.pgd directly, we should never take
 		 * any faults on kernel addresses. */
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20  3:15 [PATCH 00/11] Convert Intel IOMMU to use sva-lib helpers Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] iommu/vt-d: Add pasid private data helpers Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-21 21:25   ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-21 21:25     ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-24  2:16     ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-24  2:16       ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-24 18:54       ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-24 18:54         ` Jacob Pan
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_sva_alloc(free)_pasid() helpers Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-05-20  3:15   ` [PATCH 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use common helper to lookup svm devices Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Refactor prq_event_thread() Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Allocate/register iopf queue for sva devices Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Report prq to io-pgfault framework Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] iommu/vt-d: Add prq_report trace event Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Add common code for dmar latency performance monitors Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Expose latency monitor data through debugfs Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] iommu/vt-d: Add cache invalidation latency sampling Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Add PRQ handling " Lu Baolu
2021-05-20  3:15   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210520031531.712333-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.