[PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Corentin Labbe]

fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
partitions subnode.

Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
index 91146bdc4713..3ccd6363ee8c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static inline int redboot_checksum(struct fis_image_desc *img)
 static void parse_redboot_of(struct mtd_info *master)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
+	struct device_node *npart;
 	u32 dirblock;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -52,7 +53,11 @@ static void parse_redboot_of(struct mtd_info *master)
 	if (!np)
 		return;
 
-	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "fis-index-block", &dirblock);
+	npart = of_get_child_by_name(np, "partitions");
+	if (!npart)
+		return;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(npart, "fis-index-block", &dirblock);
 	if (ret)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.26.3

[PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Corentin Labbe]

fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
partitions subnode.

Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
index 91146bdc4713..3ccd6363ee8c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static inline int redboot_checksum(struct fis_image_desc *img)
 static void parse_redboot_of(struct mtd_info *master)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
+	struct device_node *npart;
 	u32 dirblock;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -52,7 +53,11 @@ static void parse_redboot_of(struct mtd_info *master)
 	if (!np)
 		return;
 
-	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "fis-index-block", &dirblock);
+	npart = of_get_child_by_name(np, "partitions");
+	if (!npart)
+		return;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(npart, "fis-index-block", &dirblock);
 	if (ret)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.26.3


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

[PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Corentin Labbe]

This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
index 3ccd6363ee8c..feb44a573d44 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
 struct fis_image_desc {
-    unsigned char name[16];      // Null terminated name
-    uint32_t	  flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
-    uint32_t	  mem_base;      // Address in memory where it executes
-    uint32_t	  size;          // Length of image
-    uint32_t	  entry_point;   // Execution entry point
-    uint32_t	  data_length;   // Length of actual data
-    unsigned char _pad[256-(16+7*sizeof(uint32_t))];
-    uint32_t	  desc_cksum;    // Checksum over image descriptor
-    uint32_t	  file_cksum;    // Checksum over image data
+	unsigned char name[16];      // Null terminated name
+	u32	  flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
+	u32	  mem_base;      // Address in memory where it executes
+	u32	  size;          // Length of image
+	u32	  entry_point;   // Execution entry point
+	u32	  data_length;   // Length of actual data
+	unsigned char _pad[256 - (16 + 7 * sizeof(u32))];
+	u32	  desc_cksum;    // Checksum over image descriptor
+	u32	  file_cksum;    // Checksum over image data
 };
 
 struct fis_list {
@@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 
 	parse_redboot_of(master);
 
-	if ( directory < 0 ) {
+	if (directory < 0) {
 		offset = master->size + directory * master->erasesize;
 		while (mtd_block_isbad(master, offset)) {
 			if (!offset) {
-			nogood:
-				printk(KERN_NOTICE "Failed to find a non-bad block to check for RedBoot partition table\n");
+nogood:
+				pr_notice("Failed to find a non-bad block to check for RedBoot partition table\n");
 				return -EIO;
 			}
 			offset -= master->erasesize;
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	printk(KERN_NOTICE "Searching for RedBoot partition table in %s at offset 0x%lx\n",
-	       master->name, offset);
+	pr_notice("Searching for RedBoot partition table in %s at offset 0x%lx\n",
+		  master->name, offset);
 
 	ret = mtd_read(master, offset, master->erasesize, &retlen,
 		       (void *)buf);
@@ -150,14 +150,13 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 			     && swab32(buf[i].size) < master->erasesize)) {
 				int j;
 				/* Update numslots based on actual FIS directory size */
-				numslots = swab32(buf[i].size) / sizeof (struct fis_image_desc);
+				numslots = swab32(buf[i].size) / sizeof(struct fis_image_desc);
 				for (j = 0; j < numslots; ++j) {
-
 					/* A single 0xff denotes a deleted entry.
 					 * Two of them in a row is the end of the table.
 					 */
 					if (buf[j].name[0] == 0xff) {
-				  		if (buf[j].name[1] == 0xff) {
+						if (buf[j].name[1] == 0xff) {
 							break;
 						} else {
 							continue;
@@ -184,8 +183,8 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 	}
 	if (i == numslots) {
 		/* Didn't find it */
-		printk(KERN_NOTICE "No RedBoot partition table detected in %s\n",
-		       master->name);
+		pr_notice("No RedBoot partition table detected in %s\n",
+			  master->name);
 		ret = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -204,7 +203,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 			break;
 
 		new_fl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fis_list), GFP_KERNEL);
-		namelen += strlen(buf[i].name)+1;
+		namelen += strlen(buf[i].name) + 1;
 		if (!new_fl) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -213,13 +212,13 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		if (data && data->origin)
 			buf[i].flash_base -= data->origin;
 		else
-			buf[i].flash_base &= master->size-1;
+			buf[i].flash_base &= master->size - 1;
 
 		/* I'm sure the JFFS2 code has done me permanent damage.
 		 * I now think the following is _normal_
 		 */
 		prev = &fl;
-		while(*prev && (*prev)->img->flash_base < new_fl->img->flash_base)
+		while (*prev && (*prev)->img->flash_base < new_fl->img->flash_base)
 			prev = &(*prev)->next;
 		new_fl->next = *prev;
 		*prev = new_fl;
@@ -239,7 +238,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		}
 	}
 #endif
-	parts = kzalloc(sizeof(*parts)*nrparts + nulllen + namelen, GFP_KERNEL);
+	parts = kzalloc(sizeof(*parts) * nrparts + nulllen + namelen, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!parts) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -248,23 +247,22 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 
 	nullname = (char *)&parts[nrparts];
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
-	if (nulllen > 0) {
+	if (nulllen > 0)
 		strcpy(nullname, nullstring);
-	}
 #endif
 	names = nullname + nulllen;
 
-	i=0;
+	i = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
 	if (fl->img->flash_base) {
-	       parts[0].name = nullname;
-	       parts[0].size = fl->img->flash_base;
-	       parts[0].offset = 0;
+		parts[0].name = nullname;
+		parts[0].size = fl->img->flash_base;
+		parts[0].offset = 0;
 		i++;
 	}
 #endif
-	for ( ; i<nrparts; i++) {
+	for ( ; i < nrparts; i++) {
 		parts[i].size = fl->img->size;
 		parts[i].offset = fl->img->flash_base;
 		parts[i].name = names;
@@ -272,17 +270,17 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		strcpy(names, fl->img->name);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_READONLY
 		if (!memcmp(names, "RedBoot", 8) ||
-				!memcmp(names, "RedBoot config", 15) ||
-				!memcmp(names, "FIS directory", 14)) {
+		    !memcmp(names, "RedBoot config", 15) ||
+		    !memcmp(names, "FIS directory", 14)) {
 			parts[i].mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE;
 		}
 #endif
-		names += strlen(names)+1;
+		names += strlen(names) + 1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
-		if(fl->next && fl->img->flash_base + fl->img->size + master->erasesize <= fl->next->img->flash_base) {
+		if (fl->next && fl->img->flash_base + fl->img->size + master->erasesize <= fl->next->img->flash_base) {
 			i++;
-			parts[i].offset = parts[i-1].size + parts[i-1].offset;
+			parts[i].offset = parts[i - 1].size + parts[i - 1].offset;
 			parts[i].size = fl->next->img->flash_base - parts[i].offset;
 			parts[i].name = nullname;
 		}
@@ -296,6 +294,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
  out:
 	while (fl) {
 		struct fis_list *old = fl;
+
 		fl = fl->next;
 		kfree(old);
 	}
-- 
2.26.3

[PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Corentin Labbe]

This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
index 3ccd6363ee8c..feb44a573d44 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/redboot.c
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
 struct fis_image_desc {
-    unsigned char name[16];      // Null terminated name
-    uint32_t	  flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
-    uint32_t	  mem_base;      // Address in memory where it executes
-    uint32_t	  size;          // Length of image
-    uint32_t	  entry_point;   // Execution entry point
-    uint32_t	  data_length;   // Length of actual data
-    unsigned char _pad[256-(16+7*sizeof(uint32_t))];
-    uint32_t	  desc_cksum;    // Checksum over image descriptor
-    uint32_t	  file_cksum;    // Checksum over image data
+	unsigned char name[16];      // Null terminated name
+	u32	  flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
+	u32	  mem_base;      // Address in memory where it executes
+	u32	  size;          // Length of image
+	u32	  entry_point;   // Execution entry point
+	u32	  data_length;   // Length of actual data
+	unsigned char _pad[256 - (16 + 7 * sizeof(u32))];
+	u32	  desc_cksum;    // Checksum over image descriptor
+	u32	  file_cksum;    // Checksum over image data
 };
 
 struct fis_list {
@@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 
 	parse_redboot_of(master);
 
-	if ( directory < 0 ) {
+	if (directory < 0) {
 		offset = master->size + directory * master->erasesize;
 		while (mtd_block_isbad(master, offset)) {
 			if (!offset) {
-			nogood:
-				printk(KERN_NOTICE "Failed to find a non-bad block to check for RedBoot partition table\n");
+nogood:
+				pr_notice("Failed to find a non-bad block to check for RedBoot partition table\n");
 				return -EIO;
 			}
 			offset -= master->erasesize;
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	printk(KERN_NOTICE "Searching for RedBoot partition table in %s at offset 0x%lx\n",
-	       master->name, offset);
+	pr_notice("Searching for RedBoot partition table in %s at offset 0x%lx\n",
+		  master->name, offset);
 
 	ret = mtd_read(master, offset, master->erasesize, &retlen,
 		       (void *)buf);
@@ -150,14 +150,13 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 			     && swab32(buf[i].size) < master->erasesize)) {
 				int j;
 				/* Update numslots based on actual FIS directory size */
-				numslots = swab32(buf[i].size) / sizeof (struct fis_image_desc);
+				numslots = swab32(buf[i].size) / sizeof(struct fis_image_desc);
 				for (j = 0; j < numslots; ++j) {
-
 					/* A single 0xff denotes a deleted entry.
 					 * Two of them in a row is the end of the table.
 					 */
 					if (buf[j].name[0] == 0xff) {
-				  		if (buf[j].name[1] == 0xff) {
+						if (buf[j].name[1] == 0xff) {
 							break;
 						} else {
 							continue;
@@ -184,8 +183,8 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 	}
 	if (i == numslots) {
 		/* Didn't find it */
-		printk(KERN_NOTICE "No RedBoot partition table detected in %s\n",
-		       master->name);
+		pr_notice("No RedBoot partition table detected in %s\n",
+			  master->name);
 		ret = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -204,7 +203,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 			break;
 
 		new_fl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fis_list), GFP_KERNEL);
-		namelen += strlen(buf[i].name)+1;
+		namelen += strlen(buf[i].name) + 1;
 		if (!new_fl) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -213,13 +212,13 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		if (data && data->origin)
 			buf[i].flash_base -= data->origin;
 		else
-			buf[i].flash_base &= master->size-1;
+			buf[i].flash_base &= master->size - 1;
 
 		/* I'm sure the JFFS2 code has done me permanent damage.
 		 * I now think the following is _normal_
 		 */
 		prev = &fl;
-		while(*prev && (*prev)->img->flash_base < new_fl->img->flash_base)
+		while (*prev && (*prev)->img->flash_base < new_fl->img->flash_base)
 			prev = &(*prev)->next;
 		new_fl->next = *prev;
 		*prev = new_fl;
@@ -239,7 +238,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		}
 	}
 #endif
-	parts = kzalloc(sizeof(*parts)*nrparts + nulllen + namelen, GFP_KERNEL);
+	parts = kzalloc(sizeof(*parts) * nrparts + nulllen + namelen, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!parts) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -248,23 +247,22 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 
 	nullname = (char *)&parts[nrparts];
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
-	if (nulllen > 0) {
+	if (nulllen > 0)
 		strcpy(nullname, nullstring);
-	}
 #endif
 	names = nullname + nulllen;
 
-	i=0;
+	i = 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
 	if (fl->img->flash_base) {
-	       parts[0].name = nullname;
-	       parts[0].size = fl->img->flash_base;
-	       parts[0].offset = 0;
+		parts[0].name = nullname;
+		parts[0].size = fl->img->flash_base;
+		parts[0].offset = 0;
 		i++;
 	}
 #endif
-	for ( ; i<nrparts; i++) {
+	for ( ; i < nrparts; i++) {
 		parts[i].size = fl->img->size;
 		parts[i].offset = fl->img->flash_base;
 		parts[i].name = names;
@@ -272,17 +270,17 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
 		strcpy(names, fl->img->name);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_READONLY
 		if (!memcmp(names, "RedBoot", 8) ||
-				!memcmp(names, "RedBoot config", 15) ||
-				!memcmp(names, "FIS directory", 14)) {
+		    !memcmp(names, "RedBoot config", 15) ||
+		    !memcmp(names, "FIS directory", 14)) {
 			parts[i].mask_flags = MTD_WRITEABLE;
 		}
 #endif
-		names += strlen(names)+1;
+		names += strlen(names) + 1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED
-		if(fl->next && fl->img->flash_base + fl->img->size + master->erasesize <= fl->next->img->flash_base) {
+		if (fl->next && fl->img->flash_base + fl->img->size + master->erasesize <= fl->next->img->flash_base) {
 			i++;
-			parts[i].offset = parts[i-1].size + parts[i-1].offset;
+			parts[i].offset = parts[i - 1].size + parts[i - 1].offset;
 			parts[i].size = fl->next->img->flash_base - parts[i].offset;
 			parts[i].name = nullname;
 		}
@@ -296,6 +294,7 @@ static int parse_redboot_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
  out:
 	while (fl) {
 		struct fis_list *old = fl;
+
 		fl = fl->next;
 		kfree(old);
 	}
-- 
2.26.3


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:

> fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
> For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
> partitions subnode.
>
> Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:

> fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
> For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
> partitions subnode.
>
> Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
(...)
> -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
(...)
> +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image

Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
deviations we accommodate for.

From my personal side:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
(...)
> -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
(...)
> +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image

Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
deviations we accommodate for.

From my personal side:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

Hello,

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
17:24:26 +0200:

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>  
> (...)
> > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> (...)
> > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> 
> Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> deviations we accommodate for.

I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)

I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.

Cheers,
Miquèl

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

Hello,

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
17:24:26 +0200:

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>  
> (...)
> > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> (...)
> > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> 
> Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> deviations we accommodate for.

I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)

I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.

Cheers,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> 17:24:26 +0200:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> > (...)
> > > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
> > (...)
> > > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
> >
> > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > deviations we accommodate for.
>
> I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
>
> I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.

Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
I'm too old!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> 17:24:26 +0200:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> > (...)
> > > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
> > (...)
> > > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image
> >
> > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > deviations we accommodate for.
>
> I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
>
> I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.

Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
I'm too old!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
18:00:04 +0200:

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> > 17:24:26 +0200:  
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>  
> > > (...)  
> > > > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> > > (...)  
> > > > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> > >
> > > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > > deviations we accommodate for.  
> >
> > I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
> >
> > I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.  
> 
> Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
> I'm too old!

Don't be sad, the new trend is to be sleek. In the dark I worship
variables declaration in a reverse Christmas tree order ;-)

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
18:00:04 +0200:

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> > 17:24:26 +0200:  
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>  
> > > (...)  
> > > > -    uint32_t     flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> > > (...)  
> > > > +       u32       flash_base;    // Address within FLASH of image  
> > >
> > > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > > deviations we accommodate for.  
> >
> > I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
> >
> > I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.  
> 
> Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
> I'm too old!

Don't be sad, the new trend is to be sleek. In the dark I worship
variables declaration in a reverse Christmas tree order ;-)

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:48:51 UTC, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.

Miquel

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues

[Miquel Raynal]

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:48:51 UTC, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.

Miquel

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Miquel Raynal]

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:48:50 UTC, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
> For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
> partitions subnode.
> 
> Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.

Miquel

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: seek fis-index-block in the right node

[Miquel Raynal]

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 11:48:50 UTC, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> fis-index-block is seeked in the master node and not in the partitions node.
> For following binding and current usage, the driver need to check the
> partitions subnode.
> 
> Fixes: c0e118c8a1a3 ("mtd: partitions: Add OF support to RedBoot partitions")
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.

Miquel

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/