All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-24 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm
  Cc: Mark Rutland, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei,
	kernel-team, Steven Price, stable

It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
not have to support that pointless complexity.

Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
register width.

Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Notes:
    v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
 }
 
+static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
+{
+	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
+	bool is32bit;
+	int i;
+
+	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
+	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
+		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				goto out;
-			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-24 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm; +Cc: kernel-team, stable, Steven Price

It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
not have to support that pointless complexity.

Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
register width.

Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Notes:
    v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
 }
 
+static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
+{
+	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
+	bool is32bit;
+	int i;
+
+	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
+	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
+		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				goto out;
-			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-24 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm
  Cc: Mark Rutland, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Alexandru Elisei,
	kernel-team, Steven Price, stable

It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
not have to support that pointless complexity.

Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
register width.

Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

Notes:
    v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
 }
 
+static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
+{
+	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
+	bool is32bit;
+	int i;
+
+	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
+	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
+		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				goto out;
-			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
  2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
  (?)
@ 2021-05-25  9:20   ` Mark Rutland
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2021-05-25  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
	Alexandru Elisei, kernel-team, Steven Price, stable

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 06:07:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.
> 
> Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Looks good to me!

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
> +	bool is32bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
> +	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
> +		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
>   * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> @@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	default:
>  		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
> -			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
> -				ret = -EINVAL;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
>  		} else {
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-25  9:20   ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2021-05-25  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: kernel-team, stable, Steven Price, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 06:07:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.
> 
> Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Looks good to me!

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
> +	bool is32bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
> +	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
> +		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
>   * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> @@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	default:
>  		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
> -			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
> -				ret = -EINVAL;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
>  		} else {
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-25  9:20   ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2021-05-25  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
	Alexandru Elisei, kernel-team, Steven Price, stable

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 06:07:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.
> 
> Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Looks good to me!

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2: Fix missing check against ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 (Mark)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 +++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index f612c090f2e4..01b9857757f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 956cdc240148..d37ebee085cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
> +	bool is32bit;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
> +	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
> +		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
>   * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> @@ -217,13 +236,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	default:
>  		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
> -			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
> -				ret = -EINVAL;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
>  		} else {
>  			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
  2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
  (?)
@ 2021-05-27  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-27  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier; +Cc: kernel-team, stable, Steven Price

On Mon, 24 May 2021 18:07:52 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/1] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
      commit: 66e94d5cafd4decd4f92d16a022ea587d7f4094f

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-27  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-27  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier; +Cc: kernel-team, stable, Steven Price

On Mon, 24 May 2021 18:07:52 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/1] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
      commit: 66e94d5cafd4decd4f92d16a022ea587d7f4094f

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
@ 2021-05-27  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-05-27  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier; +Cc: kernel-team, stable, Steven Price

On Mon, 24 May 2021 18:07:52 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
> forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
> not have to support that pointless complexity.
> 
> Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
> register width.

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/1] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation
      commit: 66e94d5cafd4decd4f92d16a022ea587d7f4094f

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-27  9:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-24 17:07 [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation Marc Zyngier
2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-24 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25  9:20 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25  9:20   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25  9:20   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-27  9:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-27  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-27  9:38   ` Marc Zyngier

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.