All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	jbx6244@gmail.com, hjc@rock-chips.com,
	yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com, sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, p.yadav@ti.com,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller driver
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:03:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602160357.GA4914@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601201021.4406-3-macroalpha82@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2716 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:10:19PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:

This looks mostly good, a few mostly minor comments below:

> @@ -0,0 +1,861 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Rockchip Serial Flash Controller Driver

Please make the entire comment a C++ one to make things look more
intentional.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_get_if_type(const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> +				    struct rockchip_sfc *sfc)
> +{
> +	if (op->data.buswidth == 2)
> +		return IF_TYPE_DUAL;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 4)
> +		return IF_TYPE_QUAD;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 1)
> +		return IF_TYPE_STD;
> +
> +	dev_err(sfc->dev, "unsupported SPI read mode\n");
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

This would be more idiomatically implemented as a switch statement.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, int wr, u32 timeout)
> +{
> +	unsigned long deadline = jiffies + timeout;
> +	int level;
> +
> +	while (!(level = rockchip_sfc_get_fifo_level(sfc, wr))) {
> +		if (time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline)) {
> +			dev_warn(sfc->dev, "%s fifo timeout\n", wr ? "write" : "read");
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		udelay(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	return level;

The use of the assignment in the while conditional makes it hard to tell
if this code is doing what was intended.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_write_fifo(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, const u8 *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	u8 bytes = len & 0x3;
> +	u32 dwords;
> +	int tx_level;
> +	u32 write_words;
> +	u32 tmp = 0;
> +
> +	dwords = len >> 2;
> +	while (dwords) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);
> +		if (tx_level < 0)
> +			return tx_level;
> +		write_words = min_t(u32, tx_level, dwords);
> +		iowrite32_rep(sfc->regbase + SFC_DATA, buf, write_words);
> +		buf += write_words << 2;
> +		dwords -= write_words;
> +		}

Weird indentation on the } here.

> +	/* write the rest non word aligned bytes */
> +	if (bytes) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);

It's not the source buffer being aligned that's the issue here, it's the
buffer not being a multiple of word size.

> +static irqreturn_t rockchip_sfc_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_sfc *sfc = dev_id;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = readl(sfc->regbase + SFC_RISR);
> +
> +	/* Clear interrupt */
> +	writel_relaxed(reg, sfc->regbase + SFC_ICLR);
> +
> +	if (reg & SFC_RISR_TRAN_FINISH)
> +		complete(&sfc->cp);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

This will silently clear any unknown interrupt, and silently claim to
have handled an interrupt even if none happened (eg, due to shared IRQs)
- it would be better to only ack interrupts we handle and return
IRQ_NONE if we didn't handle any.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	jbx6244@gmail.com, hjc@rock-chips.com,
	yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com, sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, p.yadav@ti.com,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller driver
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:03:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602160357.GA4914@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601201021.4406-3-macroalpha82@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2716 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:10:19PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:

This looks mostly good, a few mostly minor comments below:

> @@ -0,0 +1,861 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Rockchip Serial Flash Controller Driver

Please make the entire comment a C++ one to make things look more
intentional.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_get_if_type(const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> +				    struct rockchip_sfc *sfc)
> +{
> +	if (op->data.buswidth == 2)
> +		return IF_TYPE_DUAL;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 4)
> +		return IF_TYPE_QUAD;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 1)
> +		return IF_TYPE_STD;
> +
> +	dev_err(sfc->dev, "unsupported SPI read mode\n");
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

This would be more idiomatically implemented as a switch statement.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, int wr, u32 timeout)
> +{
> +	unsigned long deadline = jiffies + timeout;
> +	int level;
> +
> +	while (!(level = rockchip_sfc_get_fifo_level(sfc, wr))) {
> +		if (time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline)) {
> +			dev_warn(sfc->dev, "%s fifo timeout\n", wr ? "write" : "read");
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		udelay(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	return level;

The use of the assignment in the while conditional makes it hard to tell
if this code is doing what was intended.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_write_fifo(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, const u8 *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	u8 bytes = len & 0x3;
> +	u32 dwords;
> +	int tx_level;
> +	u32 write_words;
> +	u32 tmp = 0;
> +
> +	dwords = len >> 2;
> +	while (dwords) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);
> +		if (tx_level < 0)
> +			return tx_level;
> +		write_words = min_t(u32, tx_level, dwords);
> +		iowrite32_rep(sfc->regbase + SFC_DATA, buf, write_words);
> +		buf += write_words << 2;
> +		dwords -= write_words;
> +		}

Weird indentation on the } here.

> +	/* write the rest non word aligned bytes */
> +	if (bytes) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);

It's not the source buffer being aligned that's the issue here, it's the
buffer not being a multiple of word size.

> +static irqreturn_t rockchip_sfc_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_sfc *sfc = dev_id;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = readl(sfc->regbase + SFC_RISR);
> +
> +	/* Clear interrupt */
> +	writel_relaxed(reg, sfc->regbase + SFC_ICLR);
> +
> +	if (reg & SFC_RISR_TRAN_FINISH)
> +		complete(&sfc->cp);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

This will silently clear any unknown interrupt, and silently claim to
have handled an interrupt even if none happened (eg, due to shared IRQs)
- it would be better to only ack interrupts we handle and return
IRQ_NONE if we didn't handle any.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	jbx6244@gmail.com, hjc@rock-chips.com,
	yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com, sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, p.yadav@ti.com,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller driver
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:03:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210602160357.GA4914@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601201021.4406-3-macroalpha82@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2716 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:10:19PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:

This looks mostly good, a few mostly minor comments below:

> @@ -0,0 +1,861 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Rockchip Serial Flash Controller Driver

Please make the entire comment a C++ one to make things look more
intentional.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_get_if_type(const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> +				    struct rockchip_sfc *sfc)
> +{
> +	if (op->data.buswidth == 2)
> +		return IF_TYPE_DUAL;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 4)
> +		return IF_TYPE_QUAD;
> +	else if (op->data.buswidth == 1)
> +		return IF_TYPE_STD;
> +
> +	dev_err(sfc->dev, "unsupported SPI read mode\n");
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

This would be more idiomatically implemented as a switch statement.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, int wr, u32 timeout)
> +{
> +	unsigned long deadline = jiffies + timeout;
> +	int level;
> +
> +	while (!(level = rockchip_sfc_get_fifo_level(sfc, wr))) {
> +		if (time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline)) {
> +			dev_warn(sfc->dev, "%s fifo timeout\n", wr ? "write" : "read");
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
> +		udelay(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	return level;

The use of the assignment in the while conditional makes it hard to tell
if this code is doing what was intended.

> +static int rockchip_sfc_write_fifo(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, const u8 *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	u8 bytes = len & 0x3;
> +	u32 dwords;
> +	int tx_level;
> +	u32 write_words;
> +	u32 tmp = 0;
> +
> +	dwords = len >> 2;
> +	while (dwords) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);
> +		if (tx_level < 0)
> +			return tx_level;
> +		write_words = min_t(u32, tx_level, dwords);
> +		iowrite32_rep(sfc->regbase + SFC_DATA, buf, write_words);
> +		buf += write_words << 2;
> +		dwords -= write_words;
> +		}

Weird indentation on the } here.

> +	/* write the rest non word aligned bytes */
> +	if (bytes) {
> +		tx_level = rockchip_sfc_wait_fifo_ready(sfc, SFC_CMD_DIR_WR, HZ);

It's not the source buffer being aligned that's the issue here, it's the
buffer not being a multiple of word size.

> +static irqreturn_t rockchip_sfc_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_sfc *sfc = dev_id;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = readl(sfc->regbase + SFC_RISR);
> +
> +	/* Clear interrupt */
> +	writel_relaxed(reg, sfc->regbase + SFC_ICLR);
> +
> +	if (reg & SFC_RISR_TRAN_FINISH)
> +		complete(&sfc->cp);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

This will silently clear any unknown interrupt, and silently claim to
have handled an interrupt even if none happened (eg, due to shared IRQs)
- it would be better to only ack interrupts we handle and return
IRQ_NONE if we didn't handle any.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 20:10 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add Rockchip SFC(serial flash controller) support Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10 ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10 ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: rockchip-sfc: Bindings for Rockchip serial flash controller Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-02  8:13   ` Johan Jonker
2021-06-02  8:13     ` Johan Jonker
2021-06-02  8:13     ` Johan Jonker
2021-06-02 14:49     ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-02 14:49       ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller driver Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-02 16:03   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-06-02 16:03     ` Mark Brown
2021-06-02 16:03     ` Mark Brown
2021-06-01 20:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add SFC to PX30 Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SFC for Odroid Go Advance Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan
2021-06-01 20:10   ` Chris Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210602160357.GA4914@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macroalpha82@gmail.com \
    --cc=macromorgan@hotmail.com \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.