From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v8 14/19] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:47:14 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210602164719.31777-15-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org> When exec'ing a 32-bit task on a system with mismatched support for 32-bit EL0, try to ensure that it starts life on a CPU that can actually run it. Similarly, when exec'ing a 64-bit task on such a system, try to restore the old affinity mask if it was previously restricted. Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 6 ++---- arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h index 8d1c8dcb87fd..97932fbf973d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h @@ -213,10 +213,8 @@ typedef compat_elf_greg_t compat_elf_gregset_t[COMPAT_ELF_NGREG]; /* AArch32 EABI. */ #define EF_ARM_EABI_MASK 0xff000000 -#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (system_supports_32bit_el0() && \ - ((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) && \ - ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK)) - +int compat_elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *); +#define compat_elf_check_arch compat_elf_check_arch #define compat_start_thread compat_start_thread /* * Unlike the native SET_PERSONALITY macro, the compat version maintains diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index f4a91bf1ce0c..3aea06fdd1f9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/mman.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/nospec.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/stddef.h> #include <linux/sysctl.h> #include <linux/unistd.h> @@ -638,6 +639,28 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) return sp & ~0xf; } +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +int compat_elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *hdr) +{ + if (!system_supports_32bit_el0()) + return false; + + if ((hdr)->e_machine != EM_ARM) + return false; + + if (!((hdr)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK)) + return false; + + /* + * Prevent execve() of a 32-bit program from a deadline task + * if the restricted affinity mask would be inadmissible on an + * asymmetric system. + */ + return !static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0) || + task_cpus_dl_admissible(current, system_32bit_el0_cpumask()); +} +#endif + /* * Called from setup_new_exec() after (COMPAT_)SET_PERSONALITY. */ @@ -647,8 +670,22 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void) if (is_compat_task()) { mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32; - if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + + /* + * Restrict the CPU affinity mask for a 32-bit task so that + * it contains only 32-bit-capable CPUs. + * + * From the perspective of the task, this looks similar to + * what would happen if the 64-bit-only CPUs were hot-unplugged + * at the point of execve(), although we try a bit harder to + * honour the cpuset hierarchy. + */ + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) { + force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(current); set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + } + } else if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) { + relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(current); } current->mm->context.flags = mmflags; -- 2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, kernel-team@android.com Subject: [PATCH v8 14/19] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:47:14 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210602164719.31777-15-will@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210602164719.31777-1-will@kernel.org> When exec'ing a 32-bit task on a system with mismatched support for 32-bit EL0, try to ensure that it starts life on a CPU that can actually run it. Similarly, when exec'ing a 64-bit task on such a system, try to restore the old affinity mask if it was previously restricted. Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 6 ++---- arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h index 8d1c8dcb87fd..97932fbf973d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h @@ -213,10 +213,8 @@ typedef compat_elf_greg_t compat_elf_gregset_t[COMPAT_ELF_NGREG]; /* AArch32 EABI. */ #define EF_ARM_EABI_MASK 0xff000000 -#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (system_supports_32bit_el0() && \ - ((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) && \ - ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK)) - +int compat_elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *); +#define compat_elf_check_arch compat_elf_check_arch #define compat_start_thread compat_start_thread /* * Unlike the native SET_PERSONALITY macro, the compat version maintains diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index f4a91bf1ce0c..3aea06fdd1f9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/mman.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/nospec.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/stddef.h> #include <linux/sysctl.h> #include <linux/unistd.h> @@ -638,6 +639,28 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) return sp & ~0xf; } +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +int compat_elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *hdr) +{ + if (!system_supports_32bit_el0()) + return false; + + if ((hdr)->e_machine != EM_ARM) + return false; + + if (!((hdr)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK)) + return false; + + /* + * Prevent execve() of a 32-bit program from a deadline task + * if the restricted affinity mask would be inadmissible on an + * asymmetric system. + */ + return !static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0) || + task_cpus_dl_admissible(current, system_32bit_el0_cpumask()); +} +#endif + /* * Called from setup_new_exec() after (COMPAT_)SET_PERSONALITY. */ @@ -647,8 +670,22 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void) if (is_compat_task()) { mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32; - if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) + + /* + * Restrict the CPU affinity mask for a 32-bit task so that + * it contains only 32-bit-capable CPUs. + * + * From the perspective of the task, this looks similar to + * what would happen if the 64-bit-only CPUs were hot-unplugged + * at the point of execve(), although we try a bit harder to + * honour the cpuset hierarchy. + */ + if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) { + force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(current); set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + } + } else if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0)) { + relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(current); } current->mm->context.flags = mmflags; -- 2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 16:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-02 16:47 [PATCH v8 00/19] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/19] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 12:38 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 12:38 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 17:24 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 17:24 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/19] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 12:37 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 12:37 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 17:44 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 17:44 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 9:38 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 9:38 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 11:05 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 11:05 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 12:04 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 12:04 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 13:50 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 13:50 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/19] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/19] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/19] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:10 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:10 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-07 17:04 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-07 17:04 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/19] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-07 17:20 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-07 17:20 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/19] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/19] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:11 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-07 22:43 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-07 22:43 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/19] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/19] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/19] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-04 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-07 22:52 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-07 22:52 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-10 10:20 ` Valentin Schneider 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 12/19] sched: Introduce task_cpus_dl_admissible() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 9:43 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-06-03 9:43 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-06-03 9:52 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 9:52 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 13/19] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 14/19] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-03 9:45 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-06-03 9:45 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 15/19] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 12:58 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 12:58 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-03 17:40 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-03 17:40 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-04 9:49 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 9:49 ` Mark Rutland 2021-06-04 12:14 ` Qais Yousef 2021-06-04 12:14 ` Qais Yousef 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 16/19] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 17/19] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 18/19] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v8 19/19] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon 2021-06-02 16:47 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210602164719.31777-15-will@kernel.org \ --to=will@kernel.org \ --cc=bristot@redhat.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \ --cc=qperret@google.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=surenb@google.com \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.