[RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Lee Jones]

This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

 "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

 here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
 earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

 I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
 something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
 driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
 some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

 Thierry"

Guenter Roeck (5):
  ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler
  drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
  ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart()

 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  1 -
 arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c             |  6 +-----
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c              | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c             | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          |  7 +------
 drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c         | 12 ++++++++++--
 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


-- 
2.31.1

[RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Lee Jones]

This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.

Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:

 "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,

 here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
 earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

 I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
 something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
 driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
 some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

 Thierry"

Guenter Roeck (5):
  ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler
  drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM: Register with kernel restart handler
  ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
  ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart()

 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  1 -
 arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c             |  6 +-----
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c              | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c             | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          |  7 +------
 drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c         | 12 ++++++++++--
 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/5] ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly.

Select a high priority of 192 to ensure that default restart handlers
are replaced if Xen is running.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index 8ad576ecd0f1d..7f1c106b746f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/console.h>
 #include <linux/pvclock_gtod.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/time64.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
@@ -181,11 +182,18 @@ void xen_reboot(int reason)
 	BUG_ON(rc);
 }
 
-static void xen_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
+static int xen_restart(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+		       void *data)
 {
 	xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot);
+
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static struct notifier_block xen_restart_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = xen_restart,
+	.priority = 192,
+};
 
 static void xen_power_off(void)
 {
@@ -404,7 +412,7 @@ static int __init xen_pm_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	pm_power_off = xen_power_off;
-	arm_pm_restart = xen_restart;
+	register_restart_handler(&xen_restart_nb);
 	if (!xen_initial_domain()) {
 		struct timespec64 ts;
 		xen_read_wallclock(&ts);
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 1/5] ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly.

Select a high priority of 192 to ensure that default restart handlers
are replaced if Xen is running.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index 8ad576ecd0f1d..7f1c106b746f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/console.h>
 #include <linux/pvclock_gtod.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/time64.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
@@ -181,11 +182,18 @@ void xen_reboot(int reason)
 	BUG_ON(rc);
 }
 
-static void xen_restart(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
+static int xen_restart(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+		       void *data)
 {
 	xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot);
+
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static struct notifier_block xen_restart_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = xen_restart,
+	.priority = 192,
+};
 
 static void xen_power_off(void)
 {
@@ -404,7 +412,7 @@ static int __init xen_pm_init(void)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	pm_power_off = xen_power_off;
-	arm_pm_restart = xen_restart;
+	register_restart_handler(&xen_restart_nb);
 	if (!xen_initial_domain()) {
 		struct timespec64 ts;
 		xen_read_wallclock(&ts);
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/5] drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly. This enables support for replacing the PSCI restart handler
with a different handler if necessary for a specific board.

Select a priority of 129 to indicate a higher than default priority, but
keep it as low as possible since PSCI reset is known to fail on some
boards.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
index 3c1c5daf6df2e..18a47c9d5b02b 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(struct device_node *np)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void psci_sys_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
+static int psci_sys_reset(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+			  void *data)
 {
 	if ((reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM || reboot_mode == REBOOT_SOFT) &&
 	    psci_system_reset2_supported) {
@@ -309,8 +310,15 @@ static void psci_sys_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
 	} else {
 		invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_RESET, 0, 0, 0);
 	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static struct notifier_block psci_sys_reset_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = psci_sys_reset,
+	.priority = 129,
+};
+
 static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
 {
 	invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
@@ -472,7 +480,7 @@ static void __init psci_0_2_set_functions(void)
 		.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type,
 	};
 
-	arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
+	register_restart_handler(&psci_sys_reset_nb);
 
 	pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
 }
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 2/5] drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
directly. This enables support for replacing the PSCI restart handler
with a different handler if necessary for a specific board.

Select a priority of 129 to indicate a higher than default priority, but
keep it as low as possible since PSCI reset is known to fail on some
boards.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
index 3c1c5daf6df2e..18a47c9d5b02b 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(struct device_node *np)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void psci_sys_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
+static int psci_sys_reset(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+			  void *data)
 {
 	if ((reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM || reboot_mode == REBOOT_SOFT) &&
 	    psci_system_reset2_supported) {
@@ -309,8 +310,15 @@ static void psci_sys_reset(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd)
 	} else {
 		invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_RESET, 0, 0, 0);
 	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static struct notifier_block psci_sys_reset_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = psci_sys_reset,
+	.priority = 129,
+};
+
 static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
 {
 	invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
@@ -472,7 +480,7 @@ static void __init psci_0_2_set_functions(void)
 		.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type,
 	};
 
-	arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
+	register_restart_handler(&psci_sys_reset_nb);
 
 	pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
 }
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/5] ARM: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

By making use of the kernel restart handler, board specific restart
handlers can be prioritized amongst available mechanisms for a particular
board or system.

Select the default priority of 128 to indicate that the restart callback
in the machine description is the default restart mechanism.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 1a5edf562e85e..08c5676477d70 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1081,6 +1081,20 @@ void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+static void (*__arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
+
+static int arm_restart(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+		       void *data)
+{
+	__arm_pm_restart(action, data);
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block arm_restart_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = arm_restart,
+	.priority = 128,
+};
+
 void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 {
 	const struct machine_desc *mdesc = NULL;
@@ -1149,8 +1163,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	kasan_init();
 	request_standard_resources(mdesc);
 
-	if (mdesc->restart)
-		arm_pm_restart = mdesc->restart;
+	if (mdesc->restart) {
+		__arm_pm_restart = mdesc->restart;
+		register_restart_handler(&arm_restart_nb);
+	}
 
 	unflatten_device_tree();
 
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 3/5] ARM: Register with kernel restart handler

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

By making use of the kernel restart handler, board specific restart
handlers can be prioritized amongst available mechanisms for a particular
board or system.

Select the default priority of 128 to indicate that the restart callback
in the machine description is the default restart mechanism.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 1a5edf562e85e..08c5676477d70 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1081,6 +1081,20 @@ void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+static void (*__arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
+
+static int arm_restart(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+		       void *data)
+{
+	__arm_pm_restart(action, data);
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block arm_restart_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = arm_restart,
+	.priority = 128,
+};
+
 void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 {
 	const struct machine_desc *mdesc = NULL;
@@ -1149,8 +1163,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	kasan_init();
 	request_standard_resources(mdesc);
 
-	if (mdesc->restart)
-		arm_pm_restart = mdesc->restart;
+	if (mdesc->restart) {
+		__arm_pm_restart = mdesc->restart;
+		register_restart_handler(&arm_restart_nb);
+	}
 
 	unflatten_device_tree();
 
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/5] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart()

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 2 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          | 7 +------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 673be2d1263c4..305a7157c6a6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
 struct mm_struct;
 extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
 
-extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
-
 #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index b4bb67f17a2ca..5591725cebccc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
 void (*pm_power_off)(void);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
 
-void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
-
 static void noinstr __cpu_do_idle(void)
 {
 	dsb(sy);
@@ -201,10 +199,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 		efi_reboot(reboot_mode, NULL);
 
 	/* Now call the architecture specific reboot code. */
-	if (arm_pm_restart)
-		arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-	else
-		do_kernel_restart(cmd);
+	do_kernel_restart(cmd);
 
 	/*
 	 * Whoops - the architecture was unable to reboot.
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 4/5] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart()

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 2 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          | 7 +------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 673be2d1263c4..305a7157c6a6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
 struct mm_struct;
 extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
 
-extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
-
 #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif	/* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index b4bb67f17a2ca..5591725cebccc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
 void (*pm_power_off)(void);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
 
-void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
-
 static void noinstr __cpu_do_idle(void)
 {
 	dsb(sy);
@@ -201,10 +199,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 		efi_reboot(reboot_mode, NULL);
 
 	/* Now call the architecture specific reboot code. */
-	if (arm_pm_restart)
-		arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-	else
-		do_kernel_restart(cmd);
+	do_kernel_restart(cmd);
 
 	/*
 	 * Whoops - the architecture was unable to reboot.
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 5/5] ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart()

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 -
 arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c           | 6 +-----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 66f6a3ae68d27..98b37340376bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 extern void cpu_init(void);
 
 void soft_restart(unsigned long);
-extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 extern void (*arm_pm_idle)(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
index 0ce388f154226..3044fcb8d0736 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ typedef void (*phys_reset_t)(unsigned long, bool);
 /*
  * Function pointers to optional machine specific functions
  */
-void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 void (*pm_power_off)(void);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off);
 
@@ -138,10 +137,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
-	if (arm_pm_restart)
-		arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-	else
-		do_kernel_restart(cmd);
+	do_kernel_restart(cmd);
 
 	/* Give a grace period for failure to restart of 1s */
 	mdelay(1000);
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH 5/5] ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart()

[Lee Jones]

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

All users of arm_pm_restart() have been converted to use the kernel
restart handler.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 -
 arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c           | 6 +-----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 66f6a3ae68d27..98b37340376bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 extern void cpu_init(void);
 
 void soft_restart(unsigned long);
-extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 extern void (*arm_pm_idle)(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
index 0ce388f154226..3044fcb8d0736 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ typedef void (*phys_reset_t)(unsigned long, bool);
 /*
  * Function pointers to optional machine specific functions
  */
-void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 void (*pm_power_off)(void);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off);
 
@@ -138,10 +137,7 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 	local_irq_disable();
 	smp_send_stop();
 
-	if (arm_pm_restart)
-		arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd);
-	else
-		do_kernel_restart(cmd);
+	do_kernel_restart(cmd);
 
 	/* Give a grace period for failure to restart of 1s */
 	mdelay(1000);
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
> 
> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
> 
>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
> 
>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
> 
>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
-- 
Florian

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
> 
> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
> 
>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
> 
>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
> 
>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.

What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Dmitry Osipenko]

26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>
>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>
>>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>
>>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>
>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>>
>>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
> 
> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
> 

It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Dmitry Osipenko]

26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>
>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>
>>  "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>
>>  here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>>  earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>
>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>>
>>  I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>  something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>  driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>  some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
> 
> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
> 

It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>>
>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>>
>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>>
>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>>
>>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>>>
>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
>>
>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
>>
> 
> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.
> 

Yes, indeed.

Guenter

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>>
>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>>
>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>>
>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as discussed
>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>>
>>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/
>>>
>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
>>
>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
>>
> 
> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.
> 

Yes, indeed.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Florian Fainelli]

On 10/25/2021 6:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
>>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>>>
>>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>>>
>>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>>>
>>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as 
>>>> discussed
>>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>>>
>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
>>>
>>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
>>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
>>>
>>
>> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.
>>
> 
> Yes, indeed.

Great, thanks!
-- 
Florian

Re: [RESEND 0/5] ARM/arm64: arm_pm_restart removal

[Florian Fainelli]

On 10/25/2021 6:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/25/21 4:55 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 26.10.2021 02:29, Florian Fainelli пишет:
>>> On 6/4/21 7:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> This is a rebase/refresh of a set sent out, reviewed,
>>>> then forgotten about.  It's still considered useful.
>>>>
>>>> Here is an excerpt from the previous attempt:
>>>>
>>>>   "Hi Russell, ARM SoC maintainers,
>>>>
>>>>   here's the full set of patches that remove arm_pm_restart as 
>>>> discussed
>>>>   earlier. There's some background on the series in this thread:
>>>>
>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   I also have a set of patches that build on top of this and try to add
>>>>   something slightly more formal by adding a power/reset framework that
>>>>   driver can register with. If we can get this series merged, I'll find
>>>>   some time to refresh those patches and send out for review again.
>>>
>>> What happened to this patch series? Is there any chance we will get it
>>> included at some point? It is included in the Android13-5.10 tree AFAICT
>>>
>>
>> It's in mainline since v5.14, AFAICS.
>>
> 
> Yes, indeed.

Great, thanks!
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel