From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> To: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:27:23 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210615112612-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210615104810.151-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:48:10PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote: > This ensures that we will not use an invalid block size > in config space (might come from an untrusted device). > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> I'd say if device presents an unreasonable value, and we want to ignore that, then we should not negotiate VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE so that host knows. So maybe move the logic to validate_features. > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index b9fa3ef5b57c..85ae3b27ea4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, > struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size, > &blk_size); > - if (!err) > + if (!err && blk_size >= SECTOR_SIZE && blk_size <= PAGE_SIZE) > blk_queue_logical_block_size(q, blk_size); > else > blk_size = queue_logical_block_size(q); > -- > 2.11.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> To: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:27:23 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210615112612-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210615104810.151-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:48:10PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote: > This ensures that we will not use an invalid block size > in config space (might come from an untrusted device). > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> I'd say if device presents an unreasonable value, and we want to ignore that, then we should not negotiate VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE so that host knows. So maybe move the logic to validate_features. > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index b9fa3ef5b57c..85ae3b27ea4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, > struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size, > &blk_size); > - if (!err) > + if (!err && blk_size >= SECTOR_SIZE && blk_size <= PAGE_SIZE) > blk_queue_logical_block_size(q, blk_size); > else > blk_size = queue_logical_block_size(q); > -- > 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 15:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-15 10:48 [PATCH v2] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space Xie Yongji 2021-06-15 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message] 2021-06-15 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-06-16 8:35 ` Yongji Xie
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210615112612-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \ --to=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.