* Legacy?
[not found] <f40a0638-af78-c356-eef4-116b84e652c4.ref@att.net>
@ 2021-06-21 22:24 ` slow_speed
2021-06-21 22:30 ` Legacy? Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: slow_speed @ 2021-06-21 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
A particular computer does not have nftables. It shows rules for
iptables and a different set of rules for iptables-legacy. Why is
iptables-legacy active but not the plain iptables? Does legacy override
the regular?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Legacy?
2021-06-21 22:24 ` Legacy? slow_speed
@ 2021-06-21 22:30 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2021-06-21 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: slow_speed; +Cc: netfilter
slow_speed@att.net <slow_speed@att.net> wrote:
> A particular computer does not have nftables. It shows rules for iptables
> and a different set of rules for iptables-legacy. Why is iptables-legacy
> active but not the plain iptables? Does legacy override the regular?
iptables -v will probably tell that its nf_tables.
As for why iptables-legacy is involved: either some program calls
iptables-legacy instead of iptables or a program uses the raw setsockopt
interface. systemd is known to do this when built with libiptc support.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-21 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <f40a0638-af78-c356-eef4-116b84e652c4.ref@att.net>
2021-06-21 22:24 ` Legacy? slow_speed
2021-06-21 22:30 ` Legacy? Florian Westphal
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.