All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Jason Ekstrand" <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf/sync_file: Don't leak fences on merge failure
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:47:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624174732.1754546-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)

Each add_fence() call does a dma_fence_get() on the relevant fence.  In
the error path, we weren't calling dma_fence_put() so all those fences
got leaked.  Also, in the krealloc_array failure case, we weren't
freeing the fences array.  Instead, ensure that i and fences are always
zero-initialized and dma_fence_put() all the fences and kfree(fences) on
every error path.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Fixes: a02b9dc90d84 ("dma-buf/sync_file: refactor fence storage in struct sync_file")
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
index 20d9bddbb985b..394e6e1e96860 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 					 struct sync_file *b)
 {
 	struct sync_file *sync_file;
-	struct dma_fence **fences, **nfences, **a_fences, **b_fences;
-	int i, i_a, i_b, num_fences, a_num_fences, b_num_fences;
+	struct dma_fence **fences = NULL, **nfences, **a_fences, **b_fences;
+	int i = 0, i_a, i_b, num_fences, a_num_fences, b_num_fences;
 
 	sync_file = sync_file_alloc();
 	if (!sync_file)
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 	 * If a sync_file can only be created with sync_file_merge
 	 * and sync_file_create, this is a reasonable assumption.
 	 */
-	for (i = i_a = i_b = 0; i_a < a_num_fences && i_b < b_num_fences; ) {
+	for (i_a = i_b = 0; i_a < a_num_fences && i_b < b_num_fences; ) {
 		struct dma_fence *pt_a = a_fences[i_a];
 		struct dma_fence *pt_b = b_fences[i_b];
 
@@ -277,15 +277,16 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 		fences = nfences;
 	}
 
-	if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, i) < 0) {
-		kfree(fences);
+	if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, i) < 0)
 		goto err;
-	}
 
 	strlcpy(sync_file->user_name, name, sizeof(sync_file->user_name));
 	return sync_file;
 
 err:
+	while (i)
+		dma_fence_put(fences[--i]);
+	kfree(fences);
 	fput(sync_file->file);
 	return NULL;
 
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf/sync_file: Don't leak fences on merge failure
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:47:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624174732.1754546-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)

Each add_fence() call does a dma_fence_get() on the relevant fence.  In
the error path, we weren't calling dma_fence_put() so all those fences
got leaked.  Also, in the krealloc_array failure case, we weren't
freeing the fences array.  Instead, ensure that i and fences are always
zero-initialized and dma_fence_put() all the fences and kfree(fences) on
every error path.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Fixes: a02b9dc90d84 ("dma-buf/sync_file: refactor fence storage in struct sync_file")
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
index 20d9bddbb985b..394e6e1e96860 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 					 struct sync_file *b)
 {
 	struct sync_file *sync_file;
-	struct dma_fence **fences, **nfences, **a_fences, **b_fences;
-	int i, i_a, i_b, num_fences, a_num_fences, b_num_fences;
+	struct dma_fence **fences = NULL, **nfences, **a_fences, **b_fences;
+	int i = 0, i_a, i_b, num_fences, a_num_fences, b_num_fences;
 
 	sync_file = sync_file_alloc();
 	if (!sync_file)
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 	 * If a sync_file can only be created with sync_file_merge
 	 * and sync_file_create, this is a reasonable assumption.
 	 */
-	for (i = i_a = i_b = 0; i_a < a_num_fences && i_b < b_num_fences; ) {
+	for (i_a = i_b = 0; i_a < a_num_fences && i_b < b_num_fences; ) {
 		struct dma_fence *pt_a = a_fences[i_a];
 		struct dma_fence *pt_b = b_fences[i_b];
 
@@ -277,15 +277,16 @@ static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
 		fences = nfences;
 	}
 
-	if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, i) < 0) {
-		kfree(fences);
+	if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, i) < 0)
 		goto err;
-	}
 
 	strlcpy(sync_file->user_name, name, sizeof(sync_file->user_name));
 	return sync_file;
 
 err:
+	while (i)
+		dma_fence_put(fences[--i]);
+	kfree(fences);
 	fput(sync_file->file);
 	return NULL;
 
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24 17:47 Jason Ekstrand [this message]
2021-06-24 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf/sync_file: Don't leak fences on merge failure Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-24 17:58 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 17:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-06-24 19:43   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-24 19:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-12 11:37     ` Christian König
2021-07-12 11:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-07-12 13:38       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-12 13:38         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-24 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-06-25  6:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210624174732.1754546-1-jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --to=jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.