From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:12:10 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210630071211.21011-4-rppt@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> There maybe an overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() if it is called with base and size such that base + size > PHYS_ADDR_MAX Make sure that memblock_overlaps_region() caps the size to prevent such overflow and remove now duplicated call to memblock_cap_size() from memblock_is_region_reserved(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> --- mm/memblock.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 2e25d69739e0..67e0e24f8cc9 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, { unsigned long i; + memblock_cap_size(base, &size); + for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) if (memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, type->regions[i].base, type->regions[i].size)) @@ -1794,7 +1796,6 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t siz */ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_reserved(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) { - memblock_cap_size(base, &size); return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size); } -- 2.28.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:12:10 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210630071211.21011-4-rppt@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> There maybe an overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() if it is called with base and size such that base + size > PHYS_ADDR_MAX Make sure that memblock_overlaps_region() caps the size to prevent such overflow and remove now duplicated call to memblock_cap_size() from memblock_is_region_reserved(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> --- mm/memblock.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 2e25d69739e0..67e0e24f8cc9 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, { unsigned long i; + memblock_cap_size(base, &size); + for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) if (memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, type->regions[i].base, type->regions[i].size)) @@ -1794,7 +1796,6 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t siz */ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_reserved(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) { - memblock_cap_size(base, &size); return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size); } -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 7:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-30 7:12 [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory map Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] memblock: free_unused_memmap: use pageblock units instead of MAX_ORDER Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] memblock: align freed memory map on pageblock boundaries with SPARSEMEM Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport [this message] 2021-06-30 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment Mike Rapoport 2021-06-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-07-05 4:22 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-07-05 4:22 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-07-05 7:23 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-07-05 7:23 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-07-05 14:55 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-07-05 14:55 ` Guenter Roeck 2021-07-09 4:56 ` Alexey Minnekhanov 2021-07-09 4:56 ` Alexey Minnekhanov 2021-06-30 8:26 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] memblock, arm: fixes for freeing of the memory map Tony Lindgren 2021-06-30 8:26 ` Tony Lindgren 2021-11-11 7:33 ` Mark-PK Tsai 2021-11-11 7:33 ` Mark-PK Tsai 2021-11-11 9:45 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-11-11 9:45 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210630071211.21011-4-rppt@kernel.org \ --to=rppt@kernel.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.