* [PATCH v2] scsi: target: fix prot handling in WRITE SAME 32
@ 2021-07-02 9:16 Dmitry Bogdanov
2021-07-21 3:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Bogdanov @ 2021-07-02 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Petersen, target-devel; +Cc: linux-scsi, linux, Dmitry Bogdanov
WRITE SAME 32 command handling reads WRPROTECT at the wrong offset
in 1st octet instead of 10th octet.
Fixes: afd73f1b60fc ("target: Perform PROTECT sanity checks for WRITE_SAME")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov@yadro.com>
---
v2: pass the protection info into sbc_check_prot
drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index 7b07e557dc8d..6594bb0b9df0 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#include "target_core_alua.h"
static sense_reason_t
-sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *, struct se_cmd *, unsigned char *, u32, bool);
+sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *, struct se_cmd *, unsigned char, u32, bool);
static sense_reason_t sbc_execute_unmap(struct se_cmd *cmd);
static sense_reason_t
@@ -279,14 +279,14 @@ static inline unsigned long long transport_lba_64_ext(unsigned char *cdb)
}
static sense_reason_t
-sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *ops)
+sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char flags, struct sbc_ops *ops)
{
struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
sector_t end_lba = dev->transport->get_blocks(dev) + 1;
unsigned int sectors = sbc_get_write_same_sectors(cmd);
sense_reason_t ret;
- if ((flags[0] & 0x04) || (flags[0] & 0x02)) {
+ if ((flags & 0x04) || (flags & 0x02)) {
pr_err("WRITE_SAME PBDATA and LBDATA"
" bits not supported for Block Discard"
" Emulation\n");
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *o
}
/* We always have ANC_SUP == 0 so setting ANCHOR is always an error */
- if (flags[0] & 0x10) {
+ if (flags & 0x10) {
pr_warn("WRITE SAME with ANCHOR not supported\n");
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
}
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *o
* Special case for WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=1 that ends up getting
* translated into block discard requests within backend code.
*/
- if (flags[0] & 0x08) {
+ if (flags & 0x08) {
if (!ops->execute_unmap)
return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *o
if (!ops->execute_write_same)
return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, &cmd->t_task_cdb[0], sectors, true);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, flags >> 5, sectors, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -717,10 +717,9 @@ sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, bool fabric_prot, enum target_prot_type prot_
}
static sense_reason_t
-sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb,
+sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char protect,
u32 sectors, bool is_write)
{
- u8 protect = cdb[1] >> 5;
int sp_ops = cmd->se_sess->sup_prot_ops;
int pi_prot_type = dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type;
bool fabric_prot = false;
@@ -768,7 +767,7 @@ sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb,
fallthrough;
default:
pr_err("Unable to determine pi_prot_type for CDB: 0x%02x "
- "PROTECT: 0x%02x\n", cdb[0], protect);
+ "PROTECT: 0x%02x\n", cmd->t_task_cdb[0], protect);
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
}
@@ -843,7 +842,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, false);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, false);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -857,7 +856,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, false);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, false);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -871,7 +870,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, false);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, false);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -892,7 +891,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, true);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -906,7 +905,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, true);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -921,7 +920,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
- ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, sectors, true);
+ ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb[1] >> 5, sectors, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -980,7 +979,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
size = sbc_get_size(cmd, 1);
cmd->t_task_lba = get_unaligned_be64(&cdb[12]);
- ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, &cdb[10], ops);
+ ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, cdb[10], ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
break;
@@ -1079,7 +1078,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
size = sbc_get_size(cmd, 1);
cmd->t_task_lba = get_unaligned_be64(&cdb[2]);
- ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, &cdb[1], ops);
+ ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, cdb[1], ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
break;
@@ -1097,7 +1096,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
* Follow sbcr26 with WRITE_SAME (10) and check for the existence
* of byte 1 bit 3 UNMAP instead of original reserved field
*/
- ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, &cdb[1], ops);
+ ret = sbc_setup_write_same(cmd, cdb[1], ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
break;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: target: fix prot handling in WRITE SAME 32
2021-07-02 9:16 [PATCH v2] scsi: target: fix prot handling in WRITE SAME 32 Dmitry Bogdanov
@ 2021-07-21 3:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2021-07-21 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Bogdanov, target-devel; +Cc: Martin K . Petersen, linux-scsi, linux
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:16:55 +0300, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> WRITE SAME 32 command handling reads WRPROTECT at the wrong offset
> in 1st octet instead of 10th octet.
Applied to 5.14/scsi-fixes, thanks!
[1/1] scsi: target: fix prot handling in WRITE SAME 32
https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/6d8e7e7c9321
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-21 3:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-02 9:16 [PATCH v2] scsi: target: fix prot handling in WRITE SAME 32 Dmitry Bogdanov
2021-07-21 3:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.