All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:02:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210705043248.sivxgodszzhrax2d@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1625418089.1958.48.camel@mtkswgap22>

On 05-07-21, 01:01, Hector Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Viresh:
> 
> OK, Thank you.
> 
> I'll add this routine in of.c.
> May I know the below prototype is okay to you?
> 
> static int _of_get_related_cpus(const char *list_name, const char
> *cell_name, int index, struct cpumask *m)

of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int cpu, const char *list_name,
        const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask);

And actually add this in cpufreq.h, this doesn't have anything to do with OPP
and I can assume that a platform not enabling the OPP functionality to end up
using it later.

Rafael, will that be fine ? Or we add it in a completely new header ? The users
are going to be cpufreq drivers only I believe.

> And maybe I have to find somewhere to update my
> mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu]?
> 
> static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
> {
> 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);//related_cpu can copy policy
> cpus
> 		mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;//need to find somewhere to assign
> 
> 	}
> }

I am not sure I understood this part well.

-- 
viresh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:02:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210705043248.sivxgodszzhrax2d@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1625418089.1958.48.camel@mtkswgap22>

On 05-07-21, 01:01, Hector Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Viresh:
> 
> OK, Thank you.
> 
> I'll add this routine in of.c.
> May I know the below prototype is okay to you?
> 
> static int _of_get_related_cpus(const char *list_name, const char
> *cell_name, int index, struct cpumask *m)

of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int cpu, const char *list_name,
        const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask);

And actually add this in cpufreq.h, this doesn't have anything to do with OPP
and I can assume that a platform not enabling the OPP functionality to end up
using it later.

Rafael, will that be fine ? Or we add it in a completely new header ? The users
are going to be cpufreq drivers only I believe.

> And maybe I have to find somewhere to update my
> mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu]?
> 
> static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
> {
> 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);//related_cpu can copy policy
> cpus
> 		mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;//need to find somewhere to assign
> 
> 	}
> }

I am not sure I understood this part well.

-- 
viresh

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@mediatek.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:02:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210705043248.sivxgodszzhrax2d@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1625418089.1958.48.camel@mtkswgap22>

On 05-07-21, 01:01, Hector Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Viresh:
> 
> OK, Thank you.
> 
> I'll add this routine in of.c.
> May I know the below prototype is okay to you?
> 
> static int _of_get_related_cpus(const char *list_name, const char
> *cell_name, int index, struct cpumask *m)

of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int cpu, const char *list_name,
        const char *cell_name, struct cpumask *cpumask);

And actually add this in cpufreq.h, this doesn't have anything to do with OPP
and I can assume that a platform not enabling the OPP functionality to end up
using it later.

Rafael, will that be fine ? Or we add it in a completely new header ? The users
are going to be cpufreq drivers only I believe.

> And maybe I have to find somewhere to update my
> mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu]?
> 
> static int mtk_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpufreq_mtk *c)
> {
> 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &c->related_cpus);//related_cpu can copy policy
> cpus
> 		mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;//need to find somewhere to assign
> 
> 	}
> }

I am not sure I understood this part well.

-- 
viresh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-05  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-29 16:52 [PATCH v12] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for Mediatek cpufreq HW driver Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52 ` Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52 ` Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 1/2] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52   ` Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52   ` Hector Yuan
2021-06-14 10:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-14 10:40     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-14 10:40     ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]     ` <1624781848.1958.16.camel@mtkswgap22>
2021-06-28  7:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-28  7:26         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-28  7:26         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-28  9:09         ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-28  9:09           ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-28  9:09           ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-29  2:47           ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-29  2:47             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-29  2:47             ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-29  9:02             ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-29  9:02               ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-29  9:02               ` Sudeep Holla
2021-06-29  9:05               ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-29  9:05                 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-06-29  9:05                 ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]                 ` <1625418089.1958.48.camel@mtkswgap22>
2021-07-05  4:32                   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2021-07-05  4:32                     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05  4:32                     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-05-29 16:52 ` [PATCH v12 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52   ` Hector Yuan
2021-05-29 16:52   ` Hector Yuan
2021-06-02 16:58   ` Rob Herring
2021-06-02 16:58     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-02 16:58     ` Rob Herring
2021-06-27  7:56     ` Hector Yuan
2021-06-27  7:56       ` Hector Yuan
2021-06-27  7:56       ` Hector Yuan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210705043248.sivxgodszzhrax2d@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hector.yuan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.