[merged] selftests-vm-pkeys-refill-shadow-register-after-implicit-kernel-write.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged] selftests-vm-pkeys-refill-shadow-register-after-implicit-kernel-write.patch removed from -mm tree

[akpm]

The patch titled
     Subject: selftests/vm/pkeys: refill shadow register after implicit kernel write
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     selftests-vm-pkeys-refill-shadow-register-after-implicit-kernel-write.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: selftests/vm/pkeys: refill shadow register after implicit kernel write

The pkey test code keeps a "shadow" of the pkey register around.  This
ensures that any bugs which might write to the register can be caught more
quickly.

Generally, userspace has a good idea when the kernel is going to write to
the register.  For instance, alloc_pkey() is passed a permission mask. 
The caller of alloc_pkey() can update the shadow based on the return value
and the mask.

But, the kernel can also modify the pkey register in a more sneaky way. 
For mprotect(PROT_EXEC) mappings, the kernel will allocate a pkey and
write the pkey register to create an execute-only mapping.  The kernel
never tells userspace what key it uses for this.

This can cause the test to fail with messages like:

	protection_keys_64.2: pkey-helpers.h:132: _read_pkey_reg: Assertion `pkey_reg == shadow_pkey_reg' failed.

because the shadow was not updated with the new kernel-set value.

Forcibly update the shadow value immediately after an mprotect().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210611164200.EF76AB73@viggo.jf.intel.com
Fixes: 6af17cf89e99 ("x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test")
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" <desnesn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c~selftests-vm-pkeys-refill-shadow-register-after-implicit-kernel-write
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -1448,6 +1448,13 @@ void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_me
 	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
 	pkey_assert(!ret);
 
+	/*
+	 * Reset the shadow, assuming that the above mprotect()
+	 * correctly changed PKRU, but to an unknown value since
+	 * the actual alllocated pkey is unknown.
+	 */
+	shadow_pkey_reg = __read_pkey_reg();
+
 	dprintf2("pkey_reg: %016llx\n", read_pkey_reg());
 
 	/* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dave.hansen@linux.intel.com are