All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	emil.l.velikov@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:35:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712043508.11584-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this.

Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique():
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f803

The series is broken up into five patches:

1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable.

2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info().

3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c.

4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes.

5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use.

v7 -> v8:
- Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI.
- Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI.

v6 -> v7:
- Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.
- Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.
- Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.

v5 -> v6:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find.
- Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov.
- Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.

v4 -> v5:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex.
- Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI.

v3 -> v4:
- Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/
- Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set.
- Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v2 -> v3:
- Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v1 -> v2:
- Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov.

Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5):
  drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector
  drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section
  drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master
  drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock
  drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c      | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c |  5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c   |  3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/drm/drm_auth.h          |  1 +
 include/drm/drm_file.h          | 18 +++++--
 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, emil.l.velikov@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:35:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712043508.11584-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this.

Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique():
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f803

The series is broken up into five patches:

1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable.

2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info().

3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c.

4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes.

5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use.

v7 -> v8:
- Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI.
- Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI.

v6 -> v7:
- Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.
- Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.
- Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.

v5 -> v6:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find.
- Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov.
- Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.

v4 -> v5:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex.
- Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI.

v3 -> v4:
- Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/
- Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set.
- Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v2 -> v3:
- Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v1 -> v2:
- Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov.

Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5):
  drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector
  drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section
  drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master
  drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock
  drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c      | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c |  5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c   |  3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/drm/drm_auth.h          |  1 +
 include/drm/drm_file.h          | 18 +++++--
 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:35:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712043508.11584-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this.

Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique():
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f803

The series is broken up into five patches:

1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable.

2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info().

3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c.

4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes.

5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use.

v7 -> v8:
- Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI.
- Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI.

v6 -> v7:
- Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.
- Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.
- Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.

v5 -> v6:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find.
- Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov.
- Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.

v4 -> v5:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex.
- Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI.

v3 -> v4:
- Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/
- Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set.
- Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v2 -> v3:
- Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v1 -> v2:
- Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov.

Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5):
  drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector
  drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section
  drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master
  drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock
  drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c      | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c |  5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c   |  3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/drm/drm_auth.h          |  1 +
 include/drm/drm_file.h          | 18 +++++--
 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org, christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:35:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712043508.11584-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this.

Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique():
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f803

The series is broken up into five patches:

1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable.

2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info().

3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c.

4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes.

5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use.

v7 -> v8:
- Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI.
- Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI.

v6 -> v7:
- Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.
- Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.
- Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI.

v5 -> v6:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find.
- Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov.
- Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI.

v4 -> v5:
- Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex.
- Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI.

v3 -> v4:
- Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/
- Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set.
- Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v2 -> v3:
- Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.
- Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter.

v1 -> v2:
- Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov.

Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5):
  drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector
  drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section
  drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master
  drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock
  drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c      | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c |  5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c   |  3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/drm/drm_auth.h          |  1 +
 include/drm/drm_file.h          | 18 +++++--
 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-12  4:35 Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [this message]
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12  4:35   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-12 15:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs Patchwork
2021-07-12 19:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-20 18:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-20 18:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-20 18:24   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21  4:12   ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21  4:12     ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21  4:12     ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21  4:12     ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21 10:29     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 10:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 10:29       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 10:29       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 12:43       ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21 12:43         ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21 12:43         ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-21 13:23         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 13:23           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 13:23           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 13:23           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-22  9:38           ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-22  9:38             ` [Intel-gfx] " Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-22  9:38             ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-07-22  9:38             ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210712043508.11584-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --to=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.